Mafiascum.net

Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion man.

In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:unless you can tell me she isn't, I feel she was noobscum.

There's a post in there where she talks about changing the settings to see posts in hours:minutes:seconds. That's not something a non-alt typically knows. She also spoke about a few people alluding to having meta.

As much as I loathe secret alts, it didn't appear she was anything but that. A secret character alt at that. The worst of the form.

In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:Tell me why Siteflake isn't scummy and explain why you aren't protecting them.

Memeing/trolling in and of itself isn't scummy. I've seen most of you do it. As town. It's an easy mis-shred. I'm stopping us from wasting a phase on an easy mis-elim. Explain how that's scummy. Also, cite somewhere where I give a fuck about my partners as scum so much to stick my Goddamn neck out for them when nobody had a read on me. That's stupid. Don't be stupid.

In post 1225, chkflip wrote:Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion man.

In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:unless you can tell me she isn't, I feel she was noobscum.

There's a post in there where she talks about changing the settings to see posts in hours:minutes:seconds. That's not something a non-alt typically knows. She also spoke about a few people alluding to having meta.

As much as I loathe secret alts, it didn't appear she was anything but that. A secret character alt at that. The worst of the form.

In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:Tell me why Siteflake isn't scummy and explain why you aren't protecting them.

Memeing/trolling in and of itself isn't scummy. I've seen most of you do it. As town. It's an easy mis-shred. I'm stopping us from wasting a phase on an easy mis-elim. Explain how that's scummy. Also, cite somewhere where I give a fuck about my partners as scum so much to stick my Goddamn neck out for them when nobody had a read on me. That's stupid. Don't be stupid.

Jesus fucking Christ.

Forget about the trolling and look at his content.

In post 1225, chkflip wrote:Yeah well that's just, like, your opinion man.

In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:unless you can tell me she isn't, I feel she was noobscum.

There's a post in there where she talks about changing the settings to see posts in hours:minutes:seconds. That's not something a non-alt typically knows. She also spoke about a few people alluding to having meta.

As much as I loathe secret alts, it didn't appear she was anything but that. A secret character alt at that. The worst of the form.

In post 1202, Doctor Drew wrote:Tell me why Siteflake isn't scummy and explain why you aren't protecting them.

Memeing/trolling in and of itself isn't scummy. I've seen most of you do it. As town. It's an easy mis-shred. I'm stopping us from wasting a phase on an easy mis-elim. Explain how that's scummy. Also, cite somewhere where I give a fuck about my partners as scum so much to stick my Goddamn neck out for them when nobody had a read on me. That's stupid. Don't be stupid.

I get where your defense can come from a town mindset. I am not latching you to IKS regardless of IKS's alignment.

I don't care what exp level IKS has and I don't like that excuse because it is 0% AI.

I am in no means a top player so I don't want to tell anyone how they should play. I accept their play and I will react to it based on my own thoughts. IKS needs to be held accountable and that to me means a wagon to at least S-2 or S-1 before we can aptly decide if we should shred there.

Drop a Vote
Drop a Vote
Drop a Vote..?

Okay okay, I uhm think I’ll VOTE: NPOM because they tell not show.
If that makes any sense _o—<
I of course have considered every player, with my mind in a grand state.
The grand state of sleepiness.

PE: (>_>)

In post 1213, davesaz wrote:I watched that catchup in real time and noticed that he was head down on the catchup and failing to notice my replies on material later than the catchup point. That implies a much higher degree of attention being spent than a quick read.

In post 1216, chkflip wrote:Titus is town. Unsure of davesaz.

Is his assessment of your catch-up accurate?

In post 1188, WaltertheDunce10 wrote:Most of the wagons have been abs shite.

Then why do you join them?

In post 1163, chkflip wrote: NoPowerOverMe (1): Iecerint

These all need explaining or movement as well.

1. This has been explained in like half my iso.
2. My reads are mostly unchanged since page ~30. My #2 is probably Walter right now, based on his facile approach to the IKS wagon, and NPOM's attitude toward IKS. IKS meta could have a big effect on this.

In post 1229, Iecerint wrote:

In post 1213, davesaz wrote:I watched that catchup in real time and noticed that he was head down on the catchup and failing to notice my replies on material later than the catchup point. That implies a much higher degree of attention being spent than a quick read.

In post 1216, chkflip wrote:Titus is town. Unsure of davesaz.

Is his assessment of your catch-up accurate?

I'm talking about your catchup.

@chkflip: Bro, I feel like you're..



So I would humbly request that you



As for IKS; I don't usually go for Jester elimination on D1, BUT.. (a) The lack of much of anything else, and (b) the fact it's annoying and distracting, plus (c) My last scum p was acting like that and YOU WERE THERE (Jake The Wolfie in Open 789: Two-Fold 2d3) makes me not only suspect IKS may still be Scum, but ALSO makes me wonder how you could overlook that game.

Does IKS just roll scum every game?

At this point, the only way I'm taking my vote off of Galron, is if we have a half-decent Lavender wagon going.

What's the galron case?

ok NPOM, I'll do your homework for you.

#720. And then not much has changed since then.

yea but Im too lazy to find 720



post 720
Can you do that in the future?

And iceprint is TRing him?

In post 1213, davesaz wrote:

In post 1133, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 1123, Starbuck wrote:Would you say the same thing about Titus? She did a 20 person reads list, too. I don't see you going as hard at her as you are at Iec.

Obviously my original statement about how valuable those lists are still stands, but Titus at least has been somewhat active in the thread, Iecerint popped in with a sparse bit of catch up and then posted that list.

I can't remember if I commented that my reading of Iecerint's catch up was that he seemed to spend a lot more time on reading than others were giving credit for.
I watched that catchup in real time and noticed that he was head down on the catchup and failing to notice my replies on material later than the catchup point. That implies a much higher degree of attention being spent than a quick read.

@Gamma - I don't think you're being very fair to Iec here and discrediting him in favor of boosting Titus. If you read Iec's ISO, he has 16 posts of catch up before he drops his list. That's not as sparse as you are misrepping it to be. Titus hastily threw together a list only when prodded, as she said, by my 967. Iec did his on his own list (without being asked) and even explained his mindset going when queried in 744. It's interesting that you're focusing/discrediting Iec, but not giving any attention to Titus on this.

In all actuality, I didn't expect Titus to drop a full list and to have a read on every person in the game (save for one or two replacements). I'm not quite sure how anyone has that put together, but Iec's explanation in 744 lets me know that he put thought and time into his catch up and his reads list, where Titus seemingly didn't.


@dave - I noticed the same thing, which is why the attacks on Iec, without any look towards Titus, bother me.

In post 1238, pisskop wrote:yea but Im too lazy to find 720

Code: Select all

[post=720]post 720[/post]

post 720
Can you do that in the future?

Wait, I don't need to use the url link? I feel like an idiot.

In post 1242, Starbuck wrote:

In post 1238, pisskop wrote:yea but Im too lazy to find 720

Code: Select all

[post=720]post 720[/post]

post 720
Can you do that in the future?

Wait, I don't need to use the url link? I feel like an idiot.

Assuming sincerity:

oh, I handtype out mu bbcode

In post 1232, davesaz wrote:

In post 1229, Iecerint wrote:

In post 1213, davesaz wrote:I watched that catchup in real time and noticed that he was head down on the catchup and failing to notice my replies on material later than the catchup point. That implies a much higher degree of attention being spent than a quick read.

In post 1216, chkflip wrote:Titus is town. Unsure of davesaz.

Is his assessment of your catch-up accurate?

I'm talking about your catchup.

Oh. OK, nvm, that makes more sense.

In post 1243, Galron wrote:

In post 1242, Starbuck wrote:

In post 1238, pisskop wrote:yea but Im too lazy to find 720

Code: Select all

[post=720]post 720[/post]

post 720
Can you do that in the future?

Wait, I don't need to use the url link? I feel like an idiot.

Assuming sincerity:

Spoiler:

Appreciate that. I know about the highlight a few sentences to quote thing, but totally missed this.

Thank you.

In post 1240, NoPowerOverMe wrote:And iceprint is TRing him?

TRing?

In post 1234, NoPowerOverMe wrote:Does IKS just roll scum every game?

Is this you signaling that you are trying to evaluate his meta?

If so, what did you find when you did so?

In post 1237, a2rudeboy wrote:ok NPOM, I'll do your homework for you.

#720. And then not much has changed since then.

In post 727, Galron wrote:

In post 724, a2rudeboy wrote:piss- It is a noticeable Decisive Action, by two players who haven't done much in that realm before or since

'Cept nono didn't vote IKS, right?

In post 615, Galron wrote:

In post 614, Nono wrote:what's happening

IKS is scum and you should be voting there.

And other things are wrong with your case too. Go back and reassess please.