Posted: Wed Nov 25, 2020 5:40 pm
infinity, you're town, right? can i just sheep you? VOTE: skitter
In post 1230, TheGoldenParadox wrote:yeah, that's my conclusion i think. {gypyx, infinity, hopkirk} are definitely completely always town. i'm a vt and limbait so it doesn't /particularly/ matter if i get eliminated, although i hope my townflip is informative. i think skitter is the best lim tomorrow based off infinity and isis' posting (the latter who i don't have as locktown but presents fairly good arguments against skitter anyways)
In post 687, TheGoldenParadox wrote:i think the entire concept of a d1 townbloc is flawed, although the relative naturalness of it makes me question it far less. gypyx andgloria look town,as doYdraseeand infinity. i'm really going back and forth on pooky, but settling in on a slight townlean on them. hopkirk is still town, and i'm much less confident in isis, so VOTE: dunnstral this slot has been fairly bad from the beginning and has not gotten better.
In post 1233, Ydrasse wrote:so uh does tgp talk about being vt/limbait like that knowing we’re all vt?
LolwutIn post 1228, TheGoldenParadox wrote:yeah okay so my townlist (aka never fucking eliminate them ever ever everunless there is a mechanical guilty on them and i doubt that happens) is {gypyx, infinity}
In post 1225, TheGoldenParadox wrote:infinity, you're town, right? can i just sheep you? VOTE: skitter
How convenient. What happened to your confident Dunn scumread, now you’re suddenly convinced on Skitter? Do you really have a scumread on her because it sounds like a really lazy vote. I really want to vote TGP now. These recent posts of theirs are pinging my scumdar off the freaking charts. This reads like they’re throwing their vote where ever they see consensus.In post 1226, TheGoldenParadox wrote:hm. still 1000% confident that gypyx is town, but losing confidence in dunnscum. i was going to locktown jessie and then i saw the whole jester thing and now i'm just confused. i'mvt, so i have no idea what she's trying to do there.
Why did you drop your trs on me and Ydrasse?In post 1237, TheGoldenParadox wrote:gloria gloria gloria :^( i am town
i didn'tIn post 1238, Gloria Cleary wrote:Why did you drop your trs on me and Ydrasse?In post 1237, TheGoldenParadox wrote:gloria gloria gloria :^( i am town
In post 1231, Infinity 324 wrote:Why are me and hopkirk town?
you're town because like it's crazy painfully obvious that you are approaching the game from a perspective of trying to solve and scumhunt as best you can and i can see your read progressions pretty transparently
i worded that awkwardly, my badIn post 1056, Gloria Cleary wrote:*mind blown*. You seriously think I’m scum here? Am I taking crazy pills? I think I must be. :shifty:In post 1049, Morning Tweet wrote:i feel like when ive rounded up a bunch of players in the PoE, i still can't justify voting them because i dont have a reason to -- they're just not in my town pool.
Golden I got some pings on, but not nearly as much as say, Gloria or jessie. And I can see why some of their actions are scummy, i just disagree with he conclusion. in this case, the gypx obsession in particular i dont think is strong evidence.
Case and point lolIn post 1060, Gloria Cleary wrote:Oh :lol: I am so obviously towntelling in this game, it’s just whack that anyone is seriously scumreading me. I think that Skitter and Pooky mat be the only ones here that even have a clue wrt to my scumgame and this is definitely not it. And that’s another reason why I’m confident on Isis because scum!Isis would do this weird hedgey thing on me if she were scum. I rarely joke when I’m scum because I’m already extremely stressed out. And yes, I don’t think scum!Skitter would be pocketing me here because if she knows who I am, she knows I’m towntelling.
Oh, I agree with that then. i don't think making a post like that and then ghosting is much of a scum tell, although i also don't see why scum couldnt either.In post 1063, team rocket queen wrote:no more like, i don't think it is reasonable for pooky to interpret it as scummy and paint it that way, especially when gypyx was at the bottom of pooky's readslist long before the catchup thingIn post 1034, Morning Tweet wrote:am I reading it right that you interpret it as towny, jessie?
Recency, i suppose?In post 1065, team rocket queen wrote:so like, when asked why is gypyx mafia, why would the reasoning be, oh his last post is 'catchup time' a day ago when that isn't like a '!!! definitely mafia!!!' thingIn post 1063, team rocket queen wrote:no more like, i don't think it is reasonable for pooky to interpret it as scummy and paint it that way, especially when gypyx was at the bottom of pooky's readslist long before the catchup thing
Oh i see this was already covered. that was my bad lol, ping usually has a negative connotation to itIn post 1073, Gloria Cleary wrote:Oh really? Then I’m obviously reading wrong. Sorry @MT. :facepalm:In post 1071, team rocket queen wrote:i think morning tweet is saying she got town pings from us, not scum pings, if i am understanding correctly, since she said we were two of her top townreads earlier
lmaoIn post 1086, Infinity 324 wrote:I’d be impressed by gloria’s “I’m so obvtown” act is she’s scum since she’s...not obvtown.
Meta is really good for solving players who can't alter their meta with ease, though. Sometimes there are just things you cant pull off as scum. Meta DESTROYS me because of how much i loathe playing itIn post 1097, Flea The Magician wrote:I'm a policy no meta player. When you're used to people putting on acts meta becomes useless lolIn post 1075, Gloria Cleary wrote: Well, I would really like everyone to take a look at 1070 and tell me what they think?
why don't I seem motivated to you? (ノ﹏ヽ)In post 1100, Infinity 324 wrote:Ok, I did want to talk about this cause I’m still not sure on MT. Yes town re-evaluates based on new information, but there didn’t really seem to be any new information that MT was taking into account. Yes town can go back and ISO someone, but it didn’t seem particularly motivated to me. Scum opportunism seemed like a likely reason to re-evaluate there. Yeah personality could be another reason, but my gut is still kinda bothered by it.
I agree with regards to Flea, i think they would be a lot less comfortable and solvey as scum from what i've seenIn post 1112, Isis wrote:it's exactly the opposite, I'm still solving you, once I've finished solving you I won't be able to keep doing it. :3In post 1109, PookyTheMagicalBear wrote:Wait a second are you saying you don't want to solve me because it's more fun to not solve me?
When I get sure enough about a read I choose to stop considering them for the rest of the game. Some people don't really have a threshhold for that but I definitely do.
I am actually maybe sads that Flea is kind of getting to that point where I don't get to keep solving them, they might already be past it. (I want a super fancy emoji sad face to go here but I can't do fancy drawring like Flea)
♡In post 1115, Isis wrote:I would possibly interpret it differently if it was not my betrothed herself, and I don't think I've seen you play much with her before
this is my interpretation of the TGP-gypyx interacton. I also agree that the TGP/Gypx partner idea doesn't make sense.In post 1121, Hopkirk wrote:I don't get TGP's defense of gypyx in 725, but I kind of liked TGP in it. Will be interesting to see why he's such a big wagon right now.I didn't like any of Skitter30's posting on this page and am especially curious on this. I don't get pushing this association.In post 809, skitter30 wrote:tgp looks like a gypyx partner