Mafiascum.net

What's your read on Mastina? Can you go into detail, if possible?
Also Tsutsu and Moz.

I don't know how to read mastina, but I'd say town as I don't see much difference to my last game with mastina (with what there is to work with) This is a slot I'd rather look into more Day 4 or so.

At this stage Tsutsu is more likely as scum than Moz. When the Moz wagon got too big, hopped off and tried to slow it down. Keeps talking about getting rid of Moz but just ignoring it all together. Either looking to save a scum buddy or as pointed out, will be an easy mis lim if town. Either way scum.

Moz is scum for posting mostly worthless comments and forced comments while pushing the narrative still that low posts means scum. The posting from Moz has no real backing and reasons of reads are just meh.

Mastina loves to talk about her reads as town. Her posts here feel a little... non-committal and empty compared to what I've usually seen from town!Mastina.

Take a 1-minute skim of her ISO, would you still say there's not much of a difference from the last game you've seen of her?

In post 1227, Auro wrote:Mastina loves to talk about her reads as town. Her posts here feel a little... non-committal and empty compared to what I've usually seen from town!Mastina.

Take a 1-minute skim of her ISO, would you still say there's not much of a difference from the last game you've seen of her?

disagree on that one, she's actually trying to solve what the blocs means alignement-wise, which is very town-motivated imo

and heck, I don't see how she's not discussing reads even

In post 1210, Flea The Magician wrote:Tsutsu hammered anyway I think

i see you're following VC's even more closely than i do

In post 1104, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 1100, Almost50 wrote:Preliminary solve: 3 Scums in mastina/Gypyx/Vax

Thank you for your time

Id vote gypx. If mastina still alive in the later days... typically scum. But somehow im scum with them.

It could be a clash of OS's

also VFP i'd like a claim

In post 1230, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1104, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 1100, Almost50 wrote:Preliminary solve: 3 Scums in mastina/Gypyx/Vax

Thank you for your time

Id vote gypx. If mastina still alive in the later days... typically scum. But somehow im scum with them.

It could be a clash of OS's

OS?

In post 1132, tris wrote:VOTE: vax

In post 1134, VFP wrote:VOTE: Vax

In post 1133, Auro wrote:VOTE: Vax

We're anti-vaxxers now

In post 1140, Gypyx wrote:

In post 1134, VFP wrote:VOTE: Vax

yet another opportunistic vote from ViolentFinnishPizza

I was Scum with pizza in the game you modded that has just finished. Are you telling me VFP is a 3-headed hydra??

In post 1143, Xtoxm wrote:a kill on one of the most engaged players would also be incredibly damaging to town here, if he flips town

FFS, stop saying TOWNIE stuff. I found out I only hard TR you when you act scummy (and vice versa).

In post 1234, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1140, Gypyx wrote:

In post 1134, VFP wrote:VOTE: Vax

yet another opportunistic vote from ViolentFinnishPizza

I was Scum with pizza in the game you modded that has just finished. Are you telling me VFP is a 3-headed hydra??

In post 1156, VFP wrote:Even the mod thinks the votes on me is ludicrous.

You mean ludacris?

In post 1159, Flea The Magician wrote:I've got no experience outside of ongoing with moz

Someone remind me to run a game titled "ongoing".

In post 1168, mozamis wrote:

In post 1101, VFP wrote:I think I can follow A50.

so happy with lynching this.

My name is outlawed, y'know

In post 1231, Gypyx wrote:also VFP i'd like a claim

I'm sure as scum you do.

In post 1232, Gypyx wrote:

In post 1230, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1104, Vaxkiller wrote:

In post 1100, Almost50 wrote:Preliminary solve: 3 Scums in mastina/Gypyx/Vax

Thank you for your time

Id vote gypx. If mastina still alive in the later days... typically scum. But somehow im scum with them.

It could be a clash of OS's

OS?

Operating systems

In post 1240, VFP wrote:

In post 1231, Gypyx wrote:also VFP i'd like a claim

I'm sure as scum you do.

i'll take that as a no

In post 1228, Gypyx wrote:disagree on that one, she's actually trying to solve what the blocs means alignement-wise, which is very town-motivated imo

and heck, I don't see how she's not discussing reads even

Setup speculation is the most obvious thing scum!Mastina would know to fake.

I never said she's not discussing reads, I'm making a comparison to how she does as town.

In post 1243, Auro wrote:

In post 1228, Gypyx wrote:disagree on that one, she's actually trying to solve what the blocs means alignement-wise, which is very town-motivated imo

and heck, I don't see how she's not discussing reads even

Setup speculation is the most obvious thing scum!Mastina would know to fake.

I never said she's not discussing reads, I'm making a comparison to how she does as town.

yeah, ik that setup spec is easy to do as scum, but the way she doeses it (you can really *see* her builidings reads off of that, idk if i'm clear) is very towny

is there a specific way town!mastina discusses read? haven't seen her town meta so y'know

also i think it'll be pretty obvious later on even if she's indeed scum, so not too worried about that reall

In post 1242, Gypyx wrote:i'll take that as a no

The fact I'm not even E1 yet and you sit here demanding a claim worries me. But more for what seems to be the site meta now.
I'll claim when I feel like it's beneficial.

That said, my claim shouldn't affect your vote given how you're voting.
If your agenda here is PR gets benefit of the doubt, then stop thinking like that as a whole. Claims are easy to fake.

I think you're just scum here though wanting claims for the night.

In post 1245, VFP wrote:I think you're just scum here though wanting claims for the night.

there's already enough claims and softs out there. i really don't see how this point can from from a genuine and logical town mindset

In post 1245, VFP wrote:

In post 1242, Gypyx wrote:i'll take that as a no

The fact I'm not even E1 yet and you sit here demanding a claim worries me. But more for what seems to be the site meta now.
I'll claim when I feel like it's beneficial.

That said, my claim shouldn't affect your vote given how you're voting.
If your agenda here is PR gets benefit of the doubt, then stop thinking like that as a whole. Claims are easy to fake.

I think you're just scum here though wanting claims for the night.

well, it's more that plurality is getting closer, and if you're indeed a PR worth avoiding to exe, i'd rather have time to make a good alternative rather than a deadline scramble?

and PRs do get the benefit of the doubt though, and i don't see how that's a problem

In post 1246, bugspray wrote:there's already enough claims and softs out there. i really don't see how this point can from from a genuine and logical town mindset

And that's the poor site meta setting in.
What makes me less of a scum in your eyes with a claim right now?