Mafiascum.net

if im a vig I vig petapan
if I'm an investigation role I target Andre
if I'm a doc I'll protect VPF

dgb's approach to this 1v1 has been gross

In post 1219, Nero Cain wrote:I feel like people are just stuck in their reads. I think it's clear as fucking day that im town and peta is too childish and petty to unvote. IG it's possible that Rathe could scum that's just sitting on me.

am i petty or scum, pick one

In post 1220, Nero Cain wrote:DOTW, Andre, Dunn are barely playing and the derek slot is still empty

In post 1226, petapan wrote:dgb's approach to this 1v1 has been gross

The whole 1 v 1 gross, I am torn because I can't get the clarity I wish I had.

In post 1227, petapan wrote:

In post 1219, Nero Cain wrote:I feel like people are just stuck in their reads. I think it's clear as fucking day that im town and peta is too childish and petty to unvote. IG it's possible that Rathe could scum that's just sitting on me.

am i petty or scum, pick one

petty

If I'm a vig I'll vig Nero
If investigative I'll investigate Dwlee
If protective, I'll protect the obvious masons.

In post 1228, DrippingGoofball wrote:I am torn because I can't get the clarity I wish I had.

what do you need for clarity?

If I'm vig I'll vig Titus
If I'm tracker I track peta.
If I'm a protective I protect dgb.

In post 1000, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 998, VFP wrote:

In post 997, Dwlee99 wrote:Peta, I'm convinced that if I told you my favorite Wawa smoothie you'd think it was scum-indicative.

What is it?

Caramel Cream.

You gotta go with strawberry mango. Wawa's fruit smoothies>>>

990
To be honest, I think part of my read on you being strongest is the fact that you've produced so much more content than my other scum reads. You've just had a higher number of scummy posts...by nature of having more posts. Day 1 reads are tough, especially since so many people have been pretty inactive

In post 1049, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: DGB

Nah, this ain't it. I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game, even if you find their most recent posts, to quote you, "cringe"

In post 1086, VFP wrote:I only go for this as scum or 100% certain that's shown enough in my games.

What does the first part of this mean. I think my brain is fried and it's only Monday

he was claiming that he's either scum or 100% sure that nom is scum

1127
On mobile so I don't feel like quoting and formatting that whole post but when he said list specific players didn't you ask about like 10 people? Not saying anything about the validity of asking for reads but I felt like I remember you responding with a huge list which was so big it was obvious he wouldn't give reads on after refusing to make a reads list

What's your point? yes it was a pretty big list but I don't see how that makes it less bad. The only thing is that you could maybe argue that scum wouldn't be so blatantly scummy but sometimes scum just do scummy things. IDK, refusing to give stances is bad.

In post 1078, VFP wrote:I think there's evidence here that I am scum or Nom is.
If Nom flips town I'm claiming scum. We can vote either of us first.

I feel like I'm dumb reading this. I don't understand this thought process from town or scum. I'm amazed Day 1 town would want to 1v1... If you're wrong and you're town you're essentially giving scum 2 free town lims. If you're scum you're essentially putting yourself on a platter unless you think the person you're accusing will get limmed day 1 and then you can wriggle out of it day 2 by going "oops". Can someone tell me why I'm wrong?

In post 1220, Nero Cain wrote:DOTW, Andre, Dunn are barely playing and the derek slot is still empty

Weird grouping of 3 when I've been just as active if not more active than T3 and Kyo. Not everyone can post 50 times a day

Or they're both scum and one is guaranteed to bask in towncred after one dies.

Do u think they are both scum?

In post 1236, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 1049, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: DGB

Nah, this ain't it. I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game, even if you find their most recent posts, to quote you, "cringe"

It is like every post is meant to infuriate me in a subtle way that I think means it is scum.

In post 1240, Nero Cain wrote:What's your point? yes it was a pretty big list but I don't see how that makes it less bad. The only thing is that you could maybe argue that scum wouldn't be so blatantly scummy but sometimes scum just do scummy things. IDK, refusing to give stances is bad.

My point was I feel like it was obvious he wasn't going to give you reads if you asked for that such a long list of "specific" people. Whether or not he's scummy for not wanting to give a full read list, I'm not sure. I agree he should have provided SOME reads though. Independent of that, giving him a big list you know he won't fill out so that you can just hammer that point over and over just feels misleading at best though

In post 1242, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 1220, Nero Cain wrote:DOTW, Andre, Dunn are barely playing and the derek slot is still empty

Weird grouping of 3 when I've been just as active if not more active than T3 and Kyo. Not everyone can post 50 times a day

======================
and don't make it in Nero's list. why

In post 1245, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1236, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 1049, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: DGB

Nah, this ain't it. I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game, even if you find their most recent posts, to quote you, "cringe"

It is like every post is meant to infuriate me in a subtle way that I think means it is scum.

Infuriates me = scum is not the best take I've seen. Half the people in this game have been outright rude to each other repeatedly lol

In post 1248, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 1245, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1236, Dragon of the West wrote:

In post 1049, Dwlee99 wrote:VOTE: DGB

Nah, this ain't it. I'm not seeing why people started SRing DGB. Their style of posts haven't changed at all since the same people town read them at the start of the game, even if you find their most recent posts, to quote you, "cringe"

It is like every post is meant to infuriate me in a subtle way that I think means it is scum.

Infuriates me = scum is not the best take I've seen. Half the people in this game have been outright rude to each other repeatedly lol

It's about the way it irritates me though. There is a qualitative difference between how DGB's posts bother me and the way that the people being rude bothers me.