Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2021 2:57 pm
There's a dead thread???In post 1223, Toogeloo wrote:I want a sincere heartfelt apology directed at me from DGB on Day 3 or in the dead thread if I'm yeeted today. I'm just sayin'.
To be honest I don't see this as impossible. Blocking nom doesn't seem very beneficial for scum at all. If Toog is scum RB, I would imagine that they block someone else. From a town perspective, I definitely agree that nom + Galron are bad choices, since they've both claimed to have some power. But I'm also not that confident that it's better to block someone who seems vanilla. IDK what the best strategy for a town RB is, is it super bad to do that? In any case it seems like pretty feasible behavior especially compared to A50.In post 1220, DrippingGoofball wrote:Blocking nom, a claimed PR, and Galron? Nah something is wrong.In post 1191, Toogeloo wrote:I just want to understand why I'm being scum read. Because all I see is that some people don't believe that I blocked nom, and thought I was trying to save them. Is that the gist of it? No damning evidence, no other associatives, just the refusal to believe that I blocked nom.
Toog says this. I'm saying that there is a feasible world where they are town, so to prove this I assume that they are town and thus not lying about their actions.In post 1229, DrippingGoofball wrote:Xlos, who says that Toog even blocked anything?
Why are you giving Toog the benefit of the doubt but not A50. Your A50 argument was starting to make sense, but with this inconsistency, it sounds like picking and choosing. A50 claims this complex role that really doesn't make sense and you're scum reading him, and Toog claims a relatively simple role but looks scummy in the way he claims he played it but you're willing to town read him. What you're saying, using your words, is there's no feasible world where A50 is town. Assuming the conclusion then working whatever it takes to reach that conclusion? I mean assuming that Toog is town is in no way proving that they are. It's like saying that a=4 and your proof is 4=a.In post 1230, Xlos wrote:Toog says this. I'm saying that there is a feasible world where they are town, so to prove this I assume that they are town and thus not lying about their actions.In post 1229, DrippingGoofball wrote:Xlos, who says that Toog even blocked anything?
Maybe he's a traitor.In post 1233, WhemeStar wrote:Im not sure why A50 claimed my flavor for me but whatever. I don't think claiming flavor or role is smart.
Yes, as I've mentioned before, I cannot see a feasible world where A50 is town. I have been asking if anyone else can see such a feasible world, but nobody has answered me. Titus is just ignoring me ): When I try to assume that A50 is town, I still don't understand his actions. So it's not as if I am only trying to give Toog the benefit of the doubt.In post 1232, Galron wrote:Why are you giving Toog the benefit of the doubt but not A50. Your A50 argument was starting to make sense, but with this inconsistency, it sounds like picking and choosing. A50 claims this complex role that really doesn't make sense and you're scum reading him, and Toog claims a relatively simple role but looks scummy in the way he claims he played it but you're willing to town read him. What you're saying, using your words, is there's no feasible world where A50 is town. Assuming the conclusion then working whatever it takes to reach that conclusion? I mean assuming that Toog is town is in no way proving that they are. It's like saying that a=4 and your proof is 4=a.In post 1230, Xlos wrote:Toog says this. I'm saying that there is a feasible world where they are town, so to prove this I assume that they are town and thus not lying about their actions.In post 1229, DrippingGoofball wrote:Xlos, who says that Toog even blocked anything?
This is what I was trying to think to say but I couldn't think of a way to phrase it without being insulting so I just let it go.i still think he's scummy but I'm thinking it may be the manic style that is bleeding into my read, and I'm less confident than I was. I would add that town just don't want to talk to someone who isn't going to at least honestly listen and consider what's being said.In post 1238, Titus wrote:@Math, The way you're approaching this is terrible. You're trying to dictate your perception onto the thread and arguing anyone who disagrees is scummy. It isolates yourself from the game. Town get afraid to work with you and scum shut down which prevents hunting for their partners. You're not doing anyone any favors by refusing to scumhunt half the thread.
What am I ignoring?In post 1239, Xlos wrote:Titus is just ignoring me ):
nom was bloody BLOCKED by Toog on N1. Can you please see a doctor for these brain farts, cuz they're starting to smell.In post 1144, MathBlade wrote:A> Neighbor with Wheme informed of flavor claim makes no sense. It’s more likely Nom flavor checked Wheme
I dunno who the third is/was, but DGB was 1-shot and I am 1-shot by definition (I only know ONE person's flavour).In post 1144, MathBlade wrote:If we assume DGB is town for the sake of argument and A50 is town for the sake of argument, then you have three people would have ways of alignment/role checks.
And where is the proof of this?In post 1242, Almost50 wrote:nom was bloody BLOCKED by Toog on N1. Can you please see a doctor for these brain farts, cuz they're starting to smell.In post 1144, MathBlade wrote:A> Neighbor with Wheme informed of flavor claim makes no sense. It’s more likely Nom flavor checked Wheme
T3 the dead role cop.In post 1243, Almost50 wrote:I dunno who the third is/was, but DGB was 1-shot and I am 1-shot by definition (I only know ONE person's flavour).In post 1144, MathBlade wrote:If we assume DGB is town for the sake of argument and A50 is town for the sake of argument, then you have three people would have ways of alignment/role checks.
Toog is Town by play regardless.In post 1172, Galron wrote:Is this still why you think Toog is Town A50?
I did not. Your claim to me is literally ???? It has changed so much until you explain everything and to my satisfaction I see no reason for my vote to move. The most likely explanation is that you’re scum and it’s your responsibility to fix it if you’re town.In post 1247, Almost50 wrote:I also want to know why everyone took DGB's interpretation of my post for granted. WHO THE FUCK SAID I WAS A HIDER? Because I sure didn't, and I don't know how making sure both I and someone die simultaneously can be interpreted into a Hider claim of any sort.
Because WHEME IS AN INFORMED SCUMSTER, and he was Informed of someone's FLAVOUR (Just as I was), with ONE MAJOR DIFFERENCE: "flavour" is a "Role"In post 1178, Galron wrote:So there are Tests, Thoerems and Derivatives. The Derivatives are not AI. I guess there's no reason to expect that the rest of them are either. So all this flavor fishing/hunting whatever was for naught. But why would there be a flavor cop?