Mafiascum.net

In post 1217, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 556, Dwlee99 wrote:T3 your one attempt at meta on me was doing this same exact wishy washy thing where you shade me and then do a ~idk~ at the end and you were scum

Good thing I don't believe in meta

Would scum!t3 do the same exact thing to me twice in a row cause this is sort of meta but imo it's actually mostly a scum tell in and of itself. Being wishy washy and also it's easy to make up reasons to scumread someone or townread someone by just saying "blabla" meta.

I wasn’t saying you’re town or not town that was just an observation

In post 1160, redtea wrote:

In post 1153, Jacket wrote: You know, the only reason I had any hesitation on T3 at all was because I thought you might be masons with him, seeing how aggressively you attacked me for calling him scum, made it seem like you had a super strong townread you never actually verbalized. But I guess that's off the table now.

How do you want me to respond to that vote from T3? He had jack shit for a case, no one listens to him because his posts are white noise, and I don't care what he thinks. I probably gave him more of a response than was warranted.

Unless it was a LONG time ago I'm not seeing an "aggressive push" from House in his iso.

You have a good point that t3 admittedly didn't even have a case, and was just sort of finding something to do. I don't think that really warrants much of a response @House.

I KNOW I DONT HAVE A CASE I NEVER SAID I HAVE A CASE

In post 1203, Almost50 wrote:Zen asked me earlier if he should claim and I said to wait. I considered the possibility T3 didn't deny it because he wanted to bait the NK (me being BP) or something. I do TR T3, so I didn't want to get in his way.

tfw no it’s not that

In post 1211, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 12, T3 wrote:VOTE: Beorge Gailey
I voted.
VOTE: Osetr
I also voted you.

Looking at this looks like a traitor crumb until I remember Osetr is me

Am I at e1
Of course

ONLY E2

In post 1196, ssbm_Kyouko wrote:

Vote Count 1.09

TheZenMan (4):

GeorgeBailey, cool cookie, T3, fua

Almost50 (1):

Save The Dragons

House (0):

Save The Dragons (0):

Three (1):

HawaiianPizza

T3 (3):

Three, Jacket, redtea

GeorgeBailey (0):

fua (0):

Jacket (0):

Dwlee99 (0):

cool cookie (2):

Almost50, TheZenMan

redtea (0):

HawaiianPizza (0):

Not Voting (2):

House, Dwlee99

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to eliminate. Day 1 ends when an elimination is decided or in (expired on 2021-10-08 09:00:00).

Announcements

The end is nigh

Possums

17 hours
I hardclaim investigative
Unvote

In post 1227, T3 wrote:

In post 1203, Almost50 wrote:Zen asked me earlier if he should claim and I said to wait. I considered the possibility T3 didn't deny it because he wanted to bait the NK (me being BP) or something. I do TR T3, so I didn't want to get in his way.

tfw no it’s not that

What was it then? Why didn't you say you were not my Neighbor?

In post 1232, Almost50 wrote:

In post 1227, T3 wrote:

In post 1203, Almost50 wrote:Zen asked me earlier if he should claim and I said to wait. I considered the possibility T3 didn't deny it because he wanted to bait the NK (me being BP) or something. I do TR T3, so I didn't want to get in his way.

tfw no it’s not that

What was it then? Why didn't you say you were not my Neighbor?

Has to do with my role
Reasons

Please unvote

In post 1224, T3 wrote:

In post 1159, Three wrote:

In post 1125, T3 wrote:

In post 1122, Three wrote:

@T3:

Are you ever going to explain your meta reads? Because at some point or another you're going to get accused of TMI if you don't.

No

VOTE: T3

Dude
What
Why is that scummy

You don't think it's scummy to read people based on meta but then not explain what the meta is? If you're scum it's just TMI that you already know who's town and who's scum. If you're town, we have no idea what you're thinking or how accurate your meta reads actually are.

With STD for instance, you say he's town because of meta. When asked if it's something he did, you answer it's because of something he didn't do. That means nothing to anyone who doesn't know what you're talking about and could easily just come from scum since you don't have to justify that read.

T3 wrote: 17 hours
I hardclaim investigative
Unvote

Sigh.

What investigative?

In post 1225, T3 wrote:I wasn’t saying you’re town or not town that was just an observation

That's exactly what you did in MBOS

In post 1235, Three wrote:

In post 1224, T3 wrote:

In post 1159, Three wrote:

In post 1125, T3 wrote:

In post 1122, Three wrote:

@T3:

Are you ever going to explain your meta reads? Because at some point or another you're going to get accused of TMI if you don't.

No

VOTE: T3

Dude
What
Why is that scummy

You don't think it's scummy to read people based on meta but then not explain what the meta is? If you're scum it's just TMI that you already know who's town and who's scum. If you're town, we have no idea what you're thinking or how accurate your meta reads actually are.

With STD for instance, you say he's town because of meta. When asked if it's something he did, you answer it's because of something he didn't do. That means nothing to anyone who doesn't know what you're talking about and could easily just come from scum since you don't have to justify that read.

T3 wrote: 17 hours
I hardclaim investigative
Unvote

Sigh.

What investigative?

I don't want to elaborate because it only benefits scum
Please trust me

Scum me almost never ever fakes reads and when I do it's almost always obvious

In post 1236, Dwlee99 wrote:

In post 1225, T3 wrote:I wasn’t saying you’re town or not town that was just an observation

That's exactly what you did in MBOS

I thought I walked back on the meta in a later post, no?

In MBOS I read everyone completely honestly and didn't fake anything to make it seem like I didn't have an agenda, then I realized that we were going to lose if we limmed my scumpartner so I had to walk back that read to not get him limmed, the following day I was forced to bus and then we lost 2 days later after my other scumbuddy was limmed.

let's just fuckin' mass claim at this point

/s

In post 1234, T3 wrote:Please unvote

I'm not even voting you. But the way you're acting I very much doubt anyone actually voting you will unvote. You probably need to claim now, and it had better be a good one.

Oh! I missed a bunch of posts!!

In post 1237, T3 wrote:

In post 1235, Three wrote:

In post 1224, T3 wrote:

In post 1159, Three wrote:

In post 1125, T3 wrote:

In post 1122, Three wrote:

@T3:

Are you ever going to explain your meta reads? Because at some point or another you're going to get accused of TMI if you don't.

No

VOTE: T3

Dude
What
Why is that scummy

You don't think it's scummy to read people based on meta but then not explain what the meta is? If you're scum it's just TMI that you already know who's town and who's scum. If you're town, we have no idea what you're thinking or how accurate your meta reads actually are.

With STD for instance, you say he's town because of meta. When asked if it's something he did, you answer it's because of something he didn't do. That means nothing to anyone who doesn't know what you're talking about and could easily just come from scum since you don't have to justify that read.

T3 wrote: 17 hours
I hardclaim investigative
Unvote

Sigh.

What investigative?

I don't want to elaborate because it only benefits scum
Please trust me

Scum me almost never ever fakes reads and when I do it's almost always obvious

I'm not accusing you of faking reads, I'm accusing you of TMI.

It's hard to trust your claim because by all means, if you're town, you're most likely going to get night killed. With all the supposed Bulletproofs in the game it seems unlikely a protective role exists. So if you die tonight you'll flip and we learn your role anyway, or worse you potentially get role blocked and scum kills someone else to make you WIFOM bait.

Besides that, if we do trust you, who exactly do we vote? Because you were voting for me and I don't exactly want to get miseliminated.

In post 1240, Save The Dragons wrote:let's just fuckin' mass claim at this point

/s

There really have been a staggering amount of partial and full claims this game.

In post 1240, Save The Dragons wrote:let's just fuckin' mass claim at this point

/s

I'm all for it. I'll start: I am BP Neighbor. Your turn.

I'm a 2-shot even night braindead organ donor jetsetting angry creditor with 3 wishes

@T3: I dunno if you're Town or Scum, but delaying your full claim any further is scummy as hell. It gives the impression you're faking and afraid to specify lest you be CC'd. IF you're Towm you're dead already, unless you can convince a protective to be on you, and I doubt anyone will be convinced by "I'm an investigative"

In post 1246, Save The Dragons wrote:I'm a 2-shot even night braindead organ donor jetsetting angry creditor with 3 wishes

Sounds genuine enough.

In post 1246, Save The Dragons wrote:I'm a 2-shot even night braindead organ donor jetsetting angry creditor with 3 wishes

Your organs are . Hand them over.

Anyway, intent to put T3 to E-1 if he doesn’t fully claim.