Mafiascum.net

Logic in mafia games isn’t black-and-white, you fool.

In post 1221, Gamma Emerald wrote:your problem is your logic is TOO simple lol

why did u vote with me in ico if it is so simple? and simple is not bad. truth usually is a simple thing.

i go sleeping

1176 is kinda funny to me because i spend so much time each game rereading my own iso and going "what the fuck were my reads again" as either alignment because i just forget lmao

wiki's vote on salsa feels like a very bizarre gotcha - like i think all of us have at some point thought someone is town despite having bad reads, even if they're not a bad player

though i am annoyed because when i was taking a break from studying earlier, i was skimming the game and i remember thinking "wiki has a point here tho" about , but now it's midnight and my brain is fried and i cannot remember what i was thinking

i think it was about how it's odd for salsa to be freely voting alongside dwlee while not even attempting to iron out the differences the two of them have in their reads? not sure

Because sometimes it’s simple but other times it’s not. You should know that, Mr. Professional Mafia Player.

re 1097: i am not wrong about my posts not having a contradiction nor the general knowledge of "you have zero reads" not literally meaning zero but

yeah i'm over it

i think i'm in agreement with andres that dorsey kinda doesn't feel like scum here
like, i dunno, scum usually at least *tries* to have some sorta progression or appearing of being solvey or whatever
while dorsey lowkey gives zero shits right now

that said at some point i will take the n_m approach to that slot which is solve it before yelo if they don't start actually playing, so

previous couple times i was here on mafiascum my accuracy was very good before i started to listen the opinions of majority or my solid townies. so i'd better be with my logic till i have enough proofs that im somehow wrong. i dont want to loose again like that, trusting someone feelings, and loosing the game to most obvious scum who did obvious scummy mistakes, and i told about them, but nobody listened. im not in hurry, i can wait, we have rights to make mistakes

In post 1222, Selynee wrote:

In post 1026, Three wrote:

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:

In post 970, T3 wrote:

In post 966, Wiki wrote:T3 you said this makes sense (andre treads a50), now you say we should run up a50. Does "run up" mean to elim?

It doesn't matter A50's alignment. We should put him to E-1

It's this the game where everyone says weird stuff?

@T3- you have reads that are not tone based?

@Three- Again...there is no reason town would fake a read here. Especially a scum read. So, you should be the first one to want be elim here...and make a case.

PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

I...what? Why would I want to be the first one to be eliminated here? And I did make a case, it's gone on for several days now...

Why is my vote terrible? Her slot rolled scum. What's wrong with voting Salsa even though she soft defended me?

Want me elim. Typo

Nothing wrong with voting someone who soft defended you but I don't think you've mentioned Salsa before that vote. And "who do you propose to vote instead?" usually means "Who do you think we should elim" not "I'll vote whomever you say"

Why do I have to mention her before I vote her? There wasn't even much opportunity to, she was a late rep in who was catching up on the thread before that point. I don't have to publically state that I'm evaluating a slot before I'm allowed to vote them.

I know what Salsa said. The lack of initiative of who to vote is scummy to me, and she continues to lack initiative as she jumps from vote to vote as long as it seems like it's a popular choice or one she can get away with having little reason to pursue. She isn't pushing her scum reads and keeps voting outside of them.

Can we please just vote Salsa here? We need to run somebody up, we're just talking in circles at this point. I don't think we're getting anywhere, and actual pressure on a scummy slot will give us something to work with.

I don’t feel like Salsa is the best choice rn
As much as I think wiki is town I’d rather he get elimmed if it was between him and Salsa exclusively today

Why?

Salsa might actually be a team player down the road

But this a four scum game? Policy yeeting a flailing townie doesn't sit right with me when we only get three mislims before we lose. Salsa being a team player later doesn't mean anything if she still rolled scum.

Also, wagon pressure =/= elimination.

you have a point

In post 1236, Gamma Emerald wrote:Salsa might actually be a team player down the road

i explained why she is not

at least why she is not with role, well

In post 1234, Gamma Emerald wrote:As much as I think wiki is town I’d rather he get elimmed if it was between him and Salsa exclusively today

i thought about your words. this is quite bad. u cannot be so sure about her color.

In post 1208, Three wrote:

In post 1043, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1036, Three wrote:

In post 1033, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1030, Three wrote:

In post 1011, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 992, Almost50 wrote:

In post 988, Dwlee99 wrote:A50 why not salsa

I dunno. She tried to pocket me, didn't she? I'm glad to accept that pocket for today.

Yeah, pocket the person who also in people’s suspect list..

Uh, yeah, exactly. Pocketing and/or defending a suspicious townie is a common scum tactic.

This is the 2nd time you're misinterpreting me, but before clear what I ACTUALLY said, are you agreeing you're scummy? Cause I was defending YOU!

???

You're literally referring to A50 in that post. My name isn't even mentioned there.

There is the proof of your misinterpretation of my post:

A50

said scum!me is trying to pocket me and I replied sarcastically that yeah, scum!me will pocket the person who themselves in people's suspect list. What I meant there is, if scum!me want to pocket someone, that person would be the widely townread person or someone whose trust would be beneficial for scum!me. But here, people don't trust

A50

that much, so there is no point for scum!me to pocket them. And you said scum!me is trying to pocket suspicious townie as a scum tactic aka misinterpretation on Jupiter level

Can we stop with the fake misinterpretation accusations? I know what you said. I said scum still do that anyway. This is not a hard concept.

In post 1211, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 493, Salsabil Faria wrote:

Read upto page 5,

ico

seems scummy atm.

your posting starting around here was probably the most towny part of your play so far (I was going to quote wall posts I liked until I saw how large your ISO was)

In post 1222, Selynee wrote:

In post 1026, Three wrote:

In post 1018, Selynee wrote:

In post 970, T3 wrote:

In post 966, Wiki wrote:T3 you said this makes sense (andre treads a50), now you say we should run up a50. Does "run up" mean to elim?

It doesn't matter A50's alignment. We should put him to E-1

It's this the game where everyone says weird stuff?

@T3- you have reads that are not tone based?

@Three- Again...there is no reason town would fake a read here. Especially a scum read. So, you should be the first one to want be elim here...and make a case.

PS: Your vote was terrible. Which is...interesting cuz I felt like SF was soft defending you the first part of the game

I...what? Why would I want to be the first one to be eliminated here? And I did make a case, it's gone on for several days now...

Why is my vote terrible? Her slot rolled scum. What's wrong with voting Salsa even though she soft defended me?

Want me elim. Typo

Nothing wrong with voting someone who soft defended you but I don't think you've mentioned Salsa before that vote. And "who do you propose to vote instead?" usually means "Who do you think we should elim" not "I'll vote whomever you say"

In post 1223, Datisi wrote:

In post 1141, Salsabil Faria wrote:

In post 1138, Datisi wrote:i don't know how to phrase my question differently than "what do you find scummy about fakeclaiming daycop?".

you just keep quoting that post where you say it's not a normal role. but that doesn't explain anything.

Ok, I'm trying to make it clear. When I entered the game with

Dwlee

vote, it was RVS. Then I saw

gera

's post including

Wiki

's

hard claiming day cop

guilty on

Dwlee

and made 397 without realizing that day cop isn’t normal and at that point, I didn’t read the game at all. So when I saw your where you said day cop isn’t normal and vote

gera

, I was surprised at 1st that why you're not voting

Wiki

because they fake claimed guilty on someone but I also knew there had to be something, so I need to catch up first. But before starting to catch up,

Wiki

was scum to me for that fake claim.

ok, i see we're not getting anywhere because my literal question is "why are they scum for the fakeclaim?" that you keep dodging

In post 1245, Salsabil Faria wrote:Because they hard claimed guilty on someone by fake claiming a role which isn’t normal!!!!

why this is not normal for town and why is it normal for scum?
that is the question of datisi

In post 1247, Salsabil Faria wrote:For rolefishing

yeah, this was my argument about myself, when i was arguing with datisi

In post 1247, Salsabil Faria wrote:for miseliminating

is it profitable for scum!me to die with a townie (d1-he, d2-me)? no,no,no. it could be profitable if i was too susp to everybody there. but i was called townie, the situation wasn't bad for me, so there is no reason to suicide like that for a scum miseliming in townie

if you are looking for scum profit, more profit for scum!me here to make a good bussing with dwlee if we are scums
but u dont think about that