Page 50 of 100
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:29 pm
by House
In post 1223, Scorpious wrote: In post 1222, House wrote: In post 1219, Scorpious wrote:By your logic a scummy play becomes not scummy because they should “know better?”
Meme or not,that’s just stupid.
It's also a figment of your imagination.
I've said for years: actions mean nothing. The same action could come from a player of any alignment. Motive is what matters.
What’s the motivation to lie about not wanting to hammer than hammering Green?
Yes Scorpious, where IS the scum motivation in contradicting oneself THE VERY SAME DAY a statement is made?
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:30 pm
by House
In post 1225, House wrote: In post 1223, Scorpious wrote: In post 1222, House wrote: In post 1219, Scorpious wrote:By your logic a scummy play becomes not scummy because they should “know better?”
Meme or not,that’s just stupid.
It's also a figment of your imagination.
I've said for years: actions mean nothing. The same action could come from a player of any alignment. Motive is what matters.
What’s the motivation to lie about not wanting to hammer than hammering Green?
Yes Scorpious, where IS the scum motivation in contradicting oneself THE VERY SAME DAY a statement is made?
(And I'm referring to game day, before you nitpick)
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:31 pm
by Flea The Magician
In post 1224, House wrote: In post 1218, Flea The Magician wrote: In post 1213, House wrote: In post 1209, Flea The Magician wrote:Yeah cause I'm that kind of player.
You don't scare me house, and I've no reason to paranoia you currently. I have 2 people to fill that 3rd slot in my solve and currently you are not one of them.
"Currently".
Until it serves your agenda to change your mind, that is.
If me calling you scum out of the wild blue yonder with no stated reasons (note that I didn't say "no reasons"after, just none stated) after not suspecting you at all up until this point doesn't make you wonder about me, what is it going to take?
One bad flip
*might*
do it, but I'm confident you're town here.
Deal.
Vote Scorpious. Help me push it through, and hold me singularly accountable for the outcome.
That would only work if Scorpius is one of the bad flips in question
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:31 pm
by Scorpious
In post 1225, House wrote: In post 1223, Scorpious wrote: In post 1222, House wrote: In post 1219, Scorpious wrote:By your logic a scummy play becomes not scummy because they should “know better?”
Meme or not,that’s just stupid.
It's also a figment of your imagination.
I've said for years: actions mean nothing. The same action could come from a player of any alignment. Motive is what matters.
What’s the motivation to lie about not wanting to hammer than hammering Green?
Yes Scorpious, where IS the scum motivation in contradicting oneself THE VERY SAME DAY a statement is made?
Answering the question and not twisting it is also a valid option.
Especially when the answer is obvious..
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:32 pm
by Scorpious
You know the motivation, if you didn’t. Why you defend them In saying they would be “more self aware”?
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:33 pm
by House
In post 1227, Flea The Magician wrote: In post 1224, House wrote: In post 1218, Flea The Magician wrote: In post 1213, House wrote: In post 1209, Flea The Magician wrote:Yeah cause I'm that kind of player.
You don't scare me house, and I've no reason to paranoia you currently. I have 2 people to fill that 3rd slot in my solve and currently you are not one of them.
"Currently".
Until it serves your agenda to change your mind, that is.
If me calling you scum out of the wild blue yonder with no stated reasons (note that I didn't say "no reasons"after, just none stated) after not suspecting you at all up until this point doesn't make you wonder about me, what is it going to take?
One bad flip
*might*
do it, but I'm confident you're town here.
Deal.
Vote Scorpious. Help me push it through, and hold me singularly accountable for the outcome.
That would only work if Scorpius is one of the bad flips in question
If he's a good flip, we have killed scum.
Win/Win.
You have no grounds to object.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:35 pm
by House
In post 1228, Scorpious wrote: In post 1225, House wrote: In post 1223, Scorpious wrote: In post 1222, House wrote: In post 1219, Scorpious wrote:By your logic a scummy play becomes not scummy because they should “know better?”
Meme or not,that’s just stupid.
It's also a figment of your imagination.
I've said for years: actions mean nothing. The same action could come from a player of any alignment. Motive is what matters.
What’s the motivation to lie about not wanting to hammer than hammering Green?
Yes Scorpious, where IS the scum motivation in contradicting oneself THE VERY SAME DAY a statement is made?
Answering the question and not twisting it is also a valid option.
Especially when the answer is obvious..
I agree. So why are you being evasive?
You can't name a scum motivation because I've doesn't exist.
Town does shit like that all the time because town doesn't monitor every post for consistency.
That lack of survivalism is WHY ENCHANT IS TOWN.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:36 pm
by House
In post 1231, House wrote: In post 1228, Scorpious wrote: In post 1225, House wrote: In post 1223, Scorpious wrote: In post 1222, House wrote: In post 1219, Scorpious wrote:By your logic a scummy play becomes not scummy because they should “know better?”
Meme or not,that’s just stupid.
It's also a figment of your imagination.
I've said for years: actions mean nothing. The same action could come from a player of any alignment. Motive is what matters.
What’s the motivation to lie about not wanting to hammer than hammering Green?
Yes Scorpious, where IS the scum motivation in contradicting oneself THE VERY SAME DAY a statement is made?
Answering the question and not twisting it is also a valid option.
Especially when the answer is obvious..
I agree. So why are you being evasive?
You can't name a scum motivation because one* doesn't exist.
Town does shit like that all the time because town doesn't monitor every post for consistency.
That lack of survivalism is WHY ENCHANT IS TOWN.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:40 pm
by House
Enchant has been running headlong into me all day.
Again. Lack of survivalism.
I could have easily joined the chorus of voices calling for an Enchant lim, and if I had done so we'd already be reading the flip.
All Enchant cares about is pushing a scum wagon, and damn the consequences. Admirable approach, but they need to learn to sort better.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 1:49 pm
by House
Scorpious:
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:25 pm
by Flea The Magician
In post 1230, House wrote: In post 1227, Flea The Magician wrote: In post 1224, House wrote: In post 1218, Flea The Magician wrote: In post 1213, House wrote: In post 1209, Flea The Magician wrote:Yeah cause I'm that kind of player.
You don't scare me house, and I've no reason to paranoia you currently. I have 2 people to fill that 3rd slot in my solve and currently you are not one of them.
"Currently".
Until it serves your agenda to change your mind, that is.
If me calling you scum out of the wild blue yonder with no stated reasons (note that I didn't say "no reasons"after, just none stated) after not suspecting you at all up until this point doesn't make you wonder about me, what is it going to take?
One bad flip
*might*
do it, but I'm confident you're town here.
Deal.
Vote Scorpious. Help me push it through, and hold me singularly accountable for the outcome.
That would only work if Scorpius is one of the bad flips in question
If he's a good flip, we have killed scum.
Win/Win.
You have no grounds to object.
I do. You're town, I'm pretty sure Scorp is too at this point. Though Scorp goes into PoE before you. You got your work cut out to get on my scum list, ngl.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:29 pm
by Scorpious
In post 1231, House wrote: In post 1228, Scorpious wrote: In post 1225, House wrote: In post 1223, Scorpious wrote: In post 1222, House wrote: In post 1219, Scorpious wrote:By your logic a scummy play becomes not scummy because they should “know better?”
Meme or not,that’s just stupid.
It's also a figment of your imagination.
I've said for years: actions mean nothing. The same action could come from a player of any alignment. Motive is what matters.
What’s the motivation to lie about not wanting to hammer than hammering Green?
Yes Scorpious, where IS the scum motivation in contradicting oneself THE VERY SAME DAY a statement is made?
Answering the question and not twisting it is also a valid option.
Especially when the answer is obvious..
I agree. So why are you being evasive?
You can't name a scum motivation because I've doesn't exist.
Town does shit like that all the time because town doesn't monitor every post for consistency.
That lack of survivalism is WHY ENCHANT IS TOWN.
Its a total contradiction,that’s where I excel at this. Finding inconsistencies. I don’t possess all this “if this flips this this means x did this to y and y did this to x, therefore a,b and c are scum. I can’t do it, I don’t know the game like some others so I have to focus on what I can do well.
And I found a blatant contradiction, and you are white knightimg the living crap out of it.
It SCREAMS scum motivation to say they won’t hammer… then hammer. It’s the most simple concept imaginable.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:35 pm
by House
In post 1236, Scorpious wrote: In post 1231, House wrote: In post 1228, Scorpious wrote: In post 1225, House wrote: In post 1223, Scorpious wrote: In post 1222, House wrote: In post 1219, Scorpious wrote:By your logic a scummy play becomes not scummy because they should “know better?”
Meme or not,that’s just stupid.
It's also a figment of your imagination.
I've said for years: actions mean nothing. The same action could come from a player of any alignment. Motive is what matters.
What’s the motivation to lie about not wanting to hammer than hammering Green?
Yes Scorpious, where IS the scum motivation in contradicting oneself THE VERY SAME DAY a statement is made?
Answering the question and not twisting it is also a valid option.
Especially when the answer is obvious..
I agree. So why are you being evasive?
You can't name a scum motivation because I've doesn't exist.
Town does shit like that all the time because town doesn't monitor every post for consistency.
That lack of survivalism is WHY ENCHANT IS TOWN.
Its a total contradiction,that’s where I excel at this. Finding inconsistencies. I don’t possess all this “if this flips this this means x did this to y and y did this to x, therefore a,b and c are scum. I can’t do it, I don’t know the game like some others so I have to focus on what I can do well.
And I found a blatant contradiction, and you are white knightimg the living crap out of it.
It SCREAMS scum motivation to say they won’t hammer… then hammer. It’s the most simple concept imaginable.
Or...
OR...!
Enchant is just town, and there no possible way I could know that without TMI, right?
So, I'm either:
A) defending scum as town which makes me continuing to live detrimental to town
B) defending a buddy as scum
C) defending town with TMI from your perspective
Which is it, and how can you justify not trying to eliminate me, considering I'm a detriment to town even AS town, as far as you're concerned?
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:37 pm
by House
(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:39 pm
by Scorpious
In post 1238, House wrote:(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Says you…
Anyone with half a brain will read them and nod because they possess basic reasoning.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:40 pm
by House
In post 1239, Scorpious wrote: In post 1238, House wrote:(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Says you…
Anyone with half a brain will read them and nod because they possess basic reasoning.
I don't see an answer to 1237 anywhere in that post.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:40 pm
by Scorpious
But we’ve made our points.
Think the hyper posting league needs a break, and I need Tacos.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:42 pm
by House
In post 1241, Scorpious wrote:But we’ve made our points.
Think the hyper posting league needs a break, and I need Tacos.
I don't see an answer to 1237 anywhere in that post.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:43 pm
by Scorpious
In post 1240, House wrote: In post 1239, Scorpious wrote: In post 1238, House wrote:(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Says you…
Anyone with half a brain will read them and nod because they possess basic reasoning.
I don't see an answer to 1237 anywhere in that post.
D, you decided with your first post this game day I was in your lim list and your ego won’t let you back off.
Of course you’re town… doesn’t mean you’re not reading me with bias.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:46 pm
by House
In post 1243, Scorpious wrote: In post 1240, House wrote: In post 1239, Scorpious wrote: In post 1238, House wrote:(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Says you…
Anyone with half a brain will read them and nod because they possess basic reasoning.
I don't see an answer to 1237 anywhere in that post.
D, you decided with your first post this game day I was in your lim list and your ego won’t let you back off.
Of course you’re town… doesn’t mean you’re not reading me with bias.
I had already voted... 2... ? other people after I voted for you today, and forgotten about you completely until Enchant brought you up again, so
that
is a lie.
Scorpious is dodging the fuck out of being cornered into a 1v1 with me.
Not today, mon frère.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:50 pm
by Scorpious
In post 1244, House wrote: In post 1243, Scorpious wrote: In post 1240, House wrote: In post 1239, Scorpious wrote: In post 1238, House wrote:(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Says you…
Anyone with half a brain will read them and nod because they possess basic reasoning.
I don't see an answer to 1237 anywhere in that post.
D, you decided with your first post this game day I was in your lim list and your ego won’t let you back off.
Of course you’re town… doesn’t mean you’re not reading me with bias.
I had already voted... 2... ? other people after I voted for you today, and forgotten about you completely until Enchant brought you up again, so
that
is a lie.
Scorpious is dodging the fuck out of being cornered into a 1v1 with me.
Not today, mon frère.
You’re making my f’n head bleed. I never said anything about your votes. I was talking about your multi colored easy to follow teir list.
Yes. I’m terrified of a 1v1 with you.. we’ve only been doing it for 2 pages…
Now.. Tacos
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:51 pm
by House
Here is proof that Scorpious isn't even TRYING to gamesol e:
In post 1140, House wrote: In post 1139, Taly wrote:I want an elimination
House
would you want to compromise on
Enchant
Not particularly.
I'd compromise on flea or the fiend.
In post 1243, Scorpious wrote: In post 1240, House wrote: In post 1239, Scorpious wrote: In post 1238, House wrote:(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Says you…
Anyone with half a brain will read them and nod because they possess basic reasoning.
I don't see an answer to 1237 anywhere in that post.
D, you decided with your first post this game day I was in your lim list and your ego won’t let you back off.
Of course you’re town… doesn’t mean you’re not reading me with bias.
Behold...
In post 915, House wrote:Just reread Cheeky.
In fairness to Enchant, I don't think a Cheeky kill is something they'd want.
Enchant scumread Scorpious & zefiend.
VOTE: Scorpious
Voted Scorpious at start of day here..
In post 951, House wrote:Did an ISO on ɀefiend, I'm good with this ...
VOTE: ɀefiend
Moved on here..
In post 1011, House wrote: In post 1000, Dwlee99 wrote: In post 959, House wrote: In post 958, Dwlee99 wrote:Before I'd say Greeting is town for just posting big text walls I don't want to read but we trying to do some bigger brain.
I still have my reads from before. Nothing today has really swayed me but the cheeky kills makes me think we should still be considering Scorpius who hasn't done anything today.
Call me town in your next post or imma vote you.
Do you actually think you're out of the scum range you showed in opposum?
VOTE: Dwlee
You were warned.
Bounced again...
In post 1140, House wrote: In post 1139, Taly wrote:I want an elimination
House
would you want to compromise on
Enchant
Not particularly.
I'd compromise on flea or the fiend.
Didn't even MENTION Scorpious in my compromise list.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:52 pm
by House
In post 1246, House wrote:Here is proof that Scorpious isn't even TRYING to gamesolve*:
In post 1140, House wrote: In post 1139, Taly wrote:I want an elimination
House
would you want to compromise on
Enchant
Not particularly.
I'd compromise on flea or the fiend.
In post 1243, Scorpious wrote: In post 1240, House wrote: In post 1239, Scorpious wrote: In post 1238, House wrote:(your posts reek of that survivalism that Enchant has absolutely none of, btw)
Says you…
Anyone with half a brain will read them and nod because they possess basic reasoning.
I don't see an answer to 1237 anywhere in that post.
D, you decided with your first post this game day I was in your lim list and your ego won’t let you back off.
Of course you’re town… doesn’t mean you’re not reading me with bias.
Behold...
In post 915, House wrote:Just reread Cheeky.
In fairness to Enchant, I don't think a Cheeky kill is something they'd want.
Enchant scumread Scorpious & zefiend.
VOTE: Scorpious
Voted Scorpious at start of day here..
In post 951, House wrote:Did an ISO on ɀefiend, I'm good with this ...
VOTE: ɀefiend
Moved on here..
In post 1011, House wrote: In post 1000, Dwlee99 wrote: In post 959, House wrote: In post 958, Dwlee99 wrote:Before I'd say Greeting is town for just posting big text walls I don't want to read but we trying to do some bigger brain.
I still have my reads from before. Nothing today has really swayed me but the cheeky kills makes me think we should still be considering Scorpius who hasn't done anything today.
Call me town in your next post or imma vote you.
Do you actually think you're out of the scum range you showed in opposum?
VOTE: Dwlee
You were warned.
Bounced again...
In post 1140, House wrote: In post 1139, Taly wrote:I want an elimination
House
would you want to compromise on
Enchant
Not particularly.
I'd compromise on flea or the fiend.
Didn't even MENTION Scorpious in my compromise list.
EBWOP
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:55 pm
by House
But me ego won't let me consider annoying else.
Posted: Mon Jan 17, 2022 2:55 pm
by House