Mafiascum.net

Well. Arnt we all a boring sack of something else ._.

MORE QUESTIONS (still want my last one answered if you haven't yet >.>)

@: Where were you on the night the lights went out? I want to know every detail sirs and misses! Leave nothing out! I'm watching you~ >_0

@: You are aware that earlier this morning you made an awfully strange, yet familiar, sound. You were accused of being a man called Kefka. How did this make you feel? Leave no stone unturned!

@: You already know the question don't you?

@: What are your thoughts on this game atm? Waiting to get out of RVS? Have any idea how this will happen when several people refuse to get on with it?

Vote Count:

quadz08: 5

(Fate, xRECKONERx, inHimshallibe, Nautilius, bv310)

gandalf5166: 2

(Vamparific, BlazeRb)

xRECKONERx: 1

(PranaDevil)

bill1148: 1

(Devotress)

Fate: 1

(gandalf5166)

Vamparific: 1

(Chronopie)

Chronopie: 1

(quadz08)

PranaDevil: 1

(Nero Cain)

Nero Cain: 1

(KDub)

Nautilius: 1

(Midnight's Sorrow)

Not Voting:

bill1148
dramonic
JPSalazar

Lynch:

10 votes.

Deadline:

July 22nd - 8:00 PM EST

Woah, forgot about this game >.< we're still in RVS? shouldn't we be a bit further by now?

VC wrote:

---

Vote Count:

quadz08: 5

(Fate, xRECKONERx, inHimshallibe, Nautilius, bv310)

gandalf5166: 2

(Vamparific, BlazeRb)

xRECKONERx: 1

(PranaDevil)

bill1148: 1

(Devotress)

Fate: 1

(gandalf5166)

Vamparific: 1

(Chronopie)

Chronopie: 1

(quadz08)

PranaDevil: 1

(Nero Cain)

Nero Cain: 1

(KDub)

Nautilius: 1

(Midnight's Sorrow)

Not Voting:

bill1148
dramonic
JPSalazar

Lynch:

10 votes.

Deadline:

July 22nd - 8:00 PM EST

Kise, you be missin' mah vote.

Chronopie wrote:VOTE: Quadz I'd say wtf you been smokin, but it's clearly scum-weed.

I've unfortunately been helping my sister move house, so not been as active as I'd have liked, thankfully I get a break until Wednesday now.

RVS is something I generally hate, and while I don't mind joking about a bit, I find it does nothing at all to actually help the game along.

Really unsure about the wagon on Quadz that came out of seemingly nowhere, so if it's not just wagonning for the sake of it, can someone show me why we're diving on him so quickly?

for being wagony.

Where were you on the night the lights went out?

Down in the cellar [with Moses], eating sauerkraut.

What are your thoughts on this game atm? Waiting to get out of RVS? Have any idea how this will happen when several people refuse to get on with it?

I don't think you understand the RVS.

Where were you on the night the lights went out?

I was the one in the corner with bill and Nero, circumsizing the frog. (They'll probably deny it.)

What are your thoughts on this game atm? Waiting to get out of RVS? Have any idea how this will happen when several people refuse to get on with it?

http://miniurl.org/Zet

@MS: I'm not Kefka.

Midnight's Sorrow wrote:[img]
@

Everyone

: What are your thoughts on this game atm? Waiting to get out of RVS? Have any idea how this will happen when several people refuse to get on with it?

The game is extremely boring and I feel like people are intentionally not being active/not adding to the game. Yes I want to get out of RVS. I don't know but Bill, inHim, Quadz and Reck seemingly want to keep us in RVS.

PranaDevil wrote: Really unsure about the wagon on Quadz that came out of seemingly nowhere, so if it's not just wagonning for the sake of it, can someone show me why we're diving on him so quickly?

I think its mostly to "joke" but I agree that its pretty stupid.



Also:

In any case, the Quadz wagon is really really sexy and deserves further consideration.
ALSO DRAM I SEE YOU BROWSING THIS THREAD YOU BETTER POST
YOU BETTER

Allright, time to wake up and play this game!

@MS: I'd look at you, snicker and then disprove you. Then I'd dayvig you. Or something like that.


Serious Vote

dramonic wrote:

Vote: Gandalf

Serious Vote

wat

inHimshallibe wrote:I don't think you understand the RVS.

If you are scum, please do assume I don't understand anything about this game. I implore you

@nerocain: I forgot unvoting was needed. It was pretty much a joke vote anyway though so.


@prana and @nerocain:
What is wrong with wagoning for the sake of wagoning? It's the best way to get information earlier on, you push a wagon, see how various people react to the wagon, and then that's info you have for the rest of the game. Wagon's don't have to lead to a lynch.

Infact

Devotress wrote:@nerocain: I forgot unvoting was needed. It was pretty much a joke vote anyway though so.


@prana and @nerocain:
What is wrong with wagoning for the sake of wagoning? It's the best way to get information earlier on, you push a wagon, see how various people react to the wagon, and then that's info you have for the rest of the game. Wagon's don't have to lead to a lynch.

Infact

unvote

Vote quadz

Devotress wrote:@nerocain: I forgot unvoting was needed. It was pretty much a joke vote anyway though so.


@prana and @nerocain:
What is wrong with wagoning for the sake of wagoning? It's the best way to get information earlier on, you push a wagon, see how various people react to the wagon, and then that's info you have for the rest of the game. Wagon's don't have to lead to a lynch.

Infact

unvote

Vote quadz

And what information would we get? A role claim? A pro-town/scum response? Even then we'd have to decipher it. As far as wagon's not leading to a lynch, they don't have to but they can. What if we had a Executioner? People should reserve their vote until they are absolutely sure.

@ dram Why are you voting gandolf?

Nero Cain wrote:

Devotress wrote:@nerocain: I forgot unvoting was needed. It was pretty much a joke vote anyway though so.


@prana and @nerocain:
What is wrong with wagoning for the sake of wagoning? It's the best way to get information earlier on, you push a wagon, see how various people react to the wagon, and then that's info you have for the rest of the game. Wagon's don't have to lead to a lynch.

Infact

unvote

Vote quadz

Devotress wrote:@nerocain: I forgot unvoting was needed. It was pretty much a joke vote anyway though so.


@prana and @nerocain:
What is wrong with wagoning for the sake of wagoning? It's the best way to get information earlier on, you push a wagon, see how various people react to the wagon, and then that's info you have for the rest of the game. Wagon's don't have to lead to a lynch.

Infact

unvote

Vote quadz

And what information would we get? A role claim?

A pro-town/scum response? Even then we'd have to decipher it.

As far as wagon's not leading to a lynch, they don't have to but they can. What if we had a Executioner? People should reserve their vote until they are absolutely sure.

God forbid we have to decipher information in a game of mafia.
Yes I'm hoping for a protown/scum response.
Also wagon information is usefull throughout the game. Vote analysis, on like day 4, is huge, looking back at what wagon's people were willing to hop onto and when, etc.

I am voting gandalf because his sole post is saying he cant be accused of being scum because he hasnt posted.
That is quite scummy.

So yes, I am saying he is scum for saying he hasnt posted enough to be pegged as scum

Woooo! First large game ever, and I'm already at L-3! I am on a ROLL.

Also, my first game and the other game I'm currently in both had very little RVS, so forgive me if it seems like I'm prolonging it. I'm just having so much fun making up creepy serial killer stories!

WAIT WAIT WAIT.

Dram. Buttsex alliance is ON.



Serious-er vote.

quadz08 wrote:Woooo! First large game ever, and I'm already at L-3! I am on a ROLL.

Also, my first game and the other game I'm currently in both had very little RVS, so forgive me if it seems like I'm prolonging it. I'm just having so much fun making up creepy serial killer stories!

^Scum.

Reck switch back.

CAPSLOCK> Gaysex

Re Midnight: Of course I do.

Fate wrote:CAPSLOCK> Gaysex

While this is totally false, the quote you posted IS super scummeh.

Go to bed <<