Mafiascum.net

Psyche wrote:It's a bit more than whatever your other vote was based on.

But not enough for a vote after RVS.

Is the Mod obliged to work harder to find replacements for players being voted for or something?

Mods often are more likely to replace or prod players sooner if they are asked about. I was asking for a status update on his replacement/prod, more or less.

The RVS ended on Page 2. Your random vote occurred well into the middle of the 3rd.

''

See Espe's vote above mine and get back to me. We were still in RVS.

It's nice and all that you now like to repeat that I'm a townie idiot (unjustified ad hominen bull), but it still doesn't explain why you never placed your voted on me before when it was clear you never had a better place for it in the first place. When you did think I was scum, instead of "dumb town".

After RVS, I don't vote unless I aim to pressure or lynch. Pressure would be pointless at that stage, since no one else was voting for you or commenting on your behavior as scummy. It wasn't nearly enough for a lynch. I was asking you a question about the seriousness of one of your posts before being willing to vote. The response screamed town, so I didn't vote. Was I wrong for fishing for more information before voting? There are days left. Why would I throw around a vote on little substance?

gbevilchaos wrote:

Psyche wrote:It's a bit more than whatever your other vote was based on.

But not enough for a vote after RVS.

Is the Mod obliged to work harder to find replacements for players being voted for or something?

Mods often are more likely to replace or prod players sooner if they are asked about. I was asking for a status update on his replacement/prod, more or less.

The RVS ended on Page 2. Your random vote occurred well into the middle of the 3rd.

'

See Espe's vote above mine and get back to me. We were still in RVS.

I'm confused. Is it a random vote, or a vote with the purpose of getting a player prodded because only voting provokes the mod to give status updates on inactive players?

After RVS, I don't vote unless I aim to pressure or lynch. Pressure would be pointless at that stage, since no one else was voting for you or commenting on your behavior as scummy. It wasn't nearly enough for a lynch.

Now I'm a bit more confused. So you only sheep and wagon?

Why would I throw around a vote on little substance?

I don't know. Why did you throw around a vote on little substance?

Also, Misrep fail. Esp's vote wasn't RVS. It was justified with reasoning, just like yours was, despite, you know, being supposedly a random vote. Which is confusing. An antilogy.

Psyche wrote:

gbevilchaos wrote:

Psyche wrote:It's a bit more than whatever your other vote was based on.

But not enough for a vote after RVS.

Is the Mod obliged to work harder to find replacements for players being voted for or something?

Mods often are more likely to replace or prod players sooner if they are asked about. I was asking for a status update on his replacement/prod, more or less.

The RVS ended on Page 2. Your random vote occurred well into the middle of the 3rd.

'

See Espe's vote above mine and get back to me. We were still in RVS.

I'm confused. Is it a random vote, or a vote with the purpose of getting a player prodded because only voting provokes the mod to give status updates on inactive players?

After RVS, I don't vote unless I aim to pressure or lynch. Pressure would be pointless at that stage, since no one else was voting for you or commenting on your behavior as scummy. It wasn't nearly enough for a lynch.

Now I'm a bit more confused. So you only sheep and wagon?

Why would I throw around a vote on little substance?

I don't know. Why did you throw around a vote on little substance?

My vote contained little reasoning or value because it was DURING THE RANDOM VOTING STAGE. This town vs. town argument is pointless and is done. I'll answer questions from any other player but you, or any of your questions that other players would like an answer to. We're just going back and forth saying "it was a bad vote" "it was RVS" "it was a bad vote" "it was RVS"

That sheep/wagon BS is the biggest misrep of all time. I never said that at all.

And Espe's vote was because it was the largest wagon...how is that not RVS? I guess a vote on someone because of their avatar is a serious vote in your opinion as well. How about a vote based on your username?

I failed to mention this but i sometimes lose enthusiasm for this game for a few days when there are some events happening during life. Sorry for my being away, i'll post as soon as i get some sleep and some free time.

From this fight, gb is the scummier of the two tbh.


But I would still prefer a Vifam lynch.

DeathNote wrote:

~killerjester replaces acronach~

*claps*

kiwieagle wrote:From this fight, gb is the scummier of the two tbh.


But I would still prefer a Vifam lynch.

Reasons?

Hi! I'm actually not going to post until I sleep some, but thought I'd /confirm anyway.

rewq455 wrote:

kiwieagle wrote:From this fight, gb is the scummier of the two tbh.


But I would still prefer a Vifam lynch.

Reasons?

I have given.

RQS

1. Do you play Starcraft/Starcraft II?
YES

2. What's your favorite race in game?
BROtoss

3. If you were a character, which would you be? (This has 100% nothing to do with your role, don't name claim)
The Marine, if for no other reason than the quote, "You want a piece of me, boy?"

4. Ready for Heart of the Swarm?
Locked and loaded

5. How much experience do you have playing Mafia?
I've uhh.. played some SC2 custom maps of Mafia actually I've also played some marathon games and I'm in 3 other games on-site now.

6. Anything else you want to say?
GLHF, let's go.

VOTE: Vifam

He gave me the scummiest vibe. He was a little quick to jump on the town v town call, and never really gave any evidence towards his own behalf. In fact, he hasn't given us much basis for anything he's done. I also don't like his comments on the Morthas wagon, which seemed by and large an RVS kind of thing.

gbevil gave me scummy vibes of a different sense on my first read through. But Vifam is the better wagon here so I'll just leave with an IGMEOY to see if gbevil repeats anything I've seen him do so far.

gbevilchaos wrote:

Psyche wrote:

gbevilchaos wrote:

Psyche wrote:It's a bit more than whatever your other vote was based on.

But not enough for a vote after RVS.

Is the Mod obliged to work harder to find replacements for players being voted for or something?

Mods often are more likely to replace or prod players sooner if they are asked about. I was asking for a status update on his replacement/prod, more or less.

The RVS ended on Page 2. Your random vote occurred well into the middle of the 3rd.

'

See Espe's vote above mine and get back to me. We were still in RVS.

I'm confused. Is it a random vote, or a vote with the purpose of getting a player prodded because only voting provokes the mod to give status updates on inactive players?

After RVS, I don't vote unless I aim to pressure or lynch. Pressure would be pointless at that stage, since no one else was voting for you or commenting on your behavior as scummy. It wasn't nearly enough for a lynch.

Now I'm a bit more confused. So you only sheep and wagon?

Why would I throw around a vote on little substance?

I don't know. Why did you throw around a vote on little substance?

My vote contained little reasoning or value because it was DURING THE RANDOM VOTING STAGE. This town vs. town argument is pointless and is done. I'll answer questions from any other player but you, or any of your questions that other players would like an answer to. We're just going back and forth saying "it was a bad vote" "it was RVS" "it was a bad vote" "it was RVS"

That sheep/wagon BS is the biggest misrep of all time. I never said that at all.

And Espe's vote was because it was the largest wagon...how is that not RVS? I guess a vote on someone because of their avatar is a serious vote in your opinion as well. How about a vote based on your username?

So is it a random vote, or a vote during the RVS?

I don't see how it's a big misrep. It's what you said. The quote's right there.

The RVS was already over when you voted. Serious votes were already made, and serious content was already produced. Espe's weakvote was late because he hadn't read the thread. What's your excuse?

kiwieagle wrote:

rewq455 wrote:

kiwieagle wrote:From this fight, gb is the scummier of the two tbh.


But I would still prefer a Vifam lynch.

Reasons?

I have given.

Oh, hey sorry dude. I associate people with avatars, when you changed yours I confused you with the replacement.

Hey, rewq is here!

.

You're meta defense was lies!!

^ Your*. Sorry lol, if you're allowed to be a grammar nazi I'm allowed to use light humor

Wanna link to the meta lies, please?

killerjester wrote:^ Your*. Sorry lol, if you're allowed to be a grammar nazi I'm allowed to use light humor

Wanna link to the meta lies, please?

lol. That;s the one time so far I've made a grammatical error by accident so far in this thread ^^.

It's hard to link to meta lies. I can link to the lie itself, but not the justification, as the justification is the absence of justification and it is impossible to link to justification if the justification is the absence of justification, because absence has no page that can be linked to.

Psyche wrote:

rewq455 wrote:Someone who is unconfirmed would not typicaly be accussed of lurking. Just checking to see if he was there, was not thinking, once the futility was pointed out i unvoted. Look at my previous games. My meta is that i tend to switch votes often and never really be sure about it. Games are in my wiki.

No, meta does not show rapid, un-contemplative vote switching. I call BS.

Oh, I've see what you've done there. I was a bit confused because you voted gbevil a bit after you called BS on rewq's meta. But then I re-read and it made more sense. Very well, carry on.

Let's hear from rewq this time instead of him ignoring Psyche.

rewq455 wrote:

kiwieagle wrote:

rewq455 wrote:VOTE: Vote:Acronach for not even confirming yet.

huh
you expect him to confirm because....
....
you voted him?
Guys Achronach is gonna get replaced
stop wasting your time.

Yep thats EXACTLY what I expect <------ (CLARIFICATION: THIS IS A JOKE)

rewq455 wrote:UNVOTE: Acronach

Uh, WTF?
Let me get this straight, you vote for a lurker, you get called out for it, you answer in sarcastic way and you end up unvoting the lurker in the next post?
You prooved that your initial reason for voting the lurker had scum motivation ( aka, find easy prey)

VOTE: REWQ
Ah @Phyche: Just explain how you came to that conclusion, i am very interested.

I am not sure about the Vifam thing, I'll look into it later.... probably.
Am i supposed to answer some questions? If i do, please reask me.

Which conclusioN?

Your meta- investigation of rewq

He said in #141 that the investigation was inconclusive. There was lack on evidence to support rewq's claim of...

rewq's meta claim

Someone who is unconfirmed would not typicaly be accussed of lurking. Just checking to see if he was there, was not thinking, once the futility was pointed out i unvoted. Look at my previous games. My meta is that i tend to switch votes often and never really be sure about it. Games are in my wiki.

Having taken a class or two in Stats, I know the whole ordeal of creating a null hypothesis and finding evidence to disprove the null. So we can't really call BS on the rewq's meta, just that we don't find evidence that supports his claim. In the games I read, rewq wasn't very switchy about his votes.

Well, if you want to get technical. But he said, "if we look at his 'previous games', we'll see that he tends 'to switch votes often and never really be sure about it'". This is false.

Here, the absence of evidence is the evidence of absence, since, you know, there are no unknown unknowns - all of his meta is accessible.

Okay, now I'm just saying these things for fun. But they're true.

Fair enough

It's still pretty weak for a vote, just saying. The cases on Vifam and gbevil are much stronger.