Hired Help Mafia - Over - Mini 1279

[jerobbo]

It's the absoluteness of your posts that gives me a funny vibe. It also appears that's against your meta.

Why do you automatically believe one person who claims that Nacho's post is against his meta?

I didn't but I only had time to check a couple of games for myself which was why I said

appears

instead of

is

but Nacho then confirmed it himself.

UNVOTE: Yates

[enomis]

It's the absoluteness of your posts that gives me a funny vibe. It also appears that's against your meta.

Why do you automatically believe one person who claims that Nacho's post is against his meta?

I didn't but I only had time to check a couple of games for myself which was why I said

appears

instead of

is

but Nacho then confirmed it himself.

UNVOTE: Yates

Whats with the unvote.

[jerobbo]

Whats with the unvote.

Random vote from page 1.

[enomis]

That’s a pretty stupid assumption. Meanwhile I’ll go on record and say your absolute commitment to not voting when you have someone you are calling scum is in-itself scummy.

Why is that?
I'm clearly taking a position.

Then why arent you voting now? Do you play the Citizen Karne's style where you just FoS and only use your vote for hammer?

[enomis]

Whats with the unvote.

Random vote from page 1.

So you have no new fos?

[jerobbo]

Whats with the unvote.

Random vote from page 1.

So you have no new fos?

I didn't particularly like Nacho's posts and his against-meta action, but having read through again I suspect it's correct that he was fishing for reactions rather than actually going to hammer.

You?

[enomis]

Whats with the unvote.

Random vote from page 1.

So you have no new fos?

I didn't particularly like Nacho's posts and his against-meta action, but having read through again I suspect it's correct that he was fishing for reactions rather than actually going to hammer.

You?

So= to no fos. Why do you find the need to unvote? Cant you just continue to place your RVS vote on yates until you find your fos? So why didnt you vote him when you didnt particularly like Nacho's posts and his against-meta action?

Yes. I agree that he seems pretty scummy and I'm not really worried about soliciting a claim first simply because I'm going to lynch him regardless of what he claims. Why shouldn't I hamnmer?

Why are you going to hammer regardless of a claim?

Why are you so certain he's scum after 4 pages and with your 2nd post?

Why

should

you hammer should be the question?

I don't have a firm scumread on anyone yet and I don't see what the rush is, I know I'm new but jeez I can't be missing that much.

You said here you dont have a firm scumread. So you do have some 'not firm' scumread. Why dont i see you questioning them to confirm it?

VOTE: jerobbo --> this says my FoS

So...either vote me or go do something useful, like vote someone, I suggest Whisper...we're policy lynching her. <--srz face

It wasn't. Context implies that I considered him scummy just before he voted me. I mention that I'm anti-PL, then Thor665 goes and says he's serious about it.

But you didn't vote him at the time it "bothered you" why did you wait to vote?

Before he said he was serious about it, I took it as an RVS bandwagon vote.

You see this as serious? A Smiley face with a <--srz. You read this as serious? And how does you being anti-PL consider him scummy before he voted you. Because according to you, he was not "serious" then?

[jerobbo]

So= to no fos. Why do you find the need to unvote? Cant you just continue to place your RVS vote on yates until you find your fos? So why didnt you vote him when you didnt particularly like Nacho's posts and his against-meta action?

I have no idea what 'SO= to no fos' means...

I unvoted because I don't think Yates is scum, why bother to leave a vote on him when I can type one word and take it off.

I don't want to vote Nacho because after revisiting I don't think he's scum. Why are you obsessed with voting? Voting is a means to an end, it's not necessary to throw your vote around. My RVS vote gets removed and will stay off til I have good suspicions of someone.

You said here you dont have a firm scumread. So you do have some 'not firm' scumread. Why dont i see you questioning them to confirm it?
VOTE: jerobbo --> this says my FoS

I have a couple of possibles on my list, yes. Nothing that currently warrants further investigation, just things I'm keeping my eye on. When I feel it's time to share then don't worry I will.

[enomis]

So= to no fos. Why do you find the need to unvote? Cant you just continue to place your RVS vote on yates until you find your fos? So why didnt you vote him when you didnt particularly like Nacho's posts and his against-meta action?

I have no idea what 'SO= to no fos' means...

I unvoted because I don't think Yates is scum, why bother to leave a vote on him when I can type one word and take it off.

I don't want to vote Nacho because after revisiting I don't think he's scum. Why are you obsessed with voting? Voting is a means to an end, it's not necessary to throw your vote around. My RVS vote gets removed and will stay off til I have good suspicions of someone.

You said here you dont have a firm scumread. So you do have some 'not firm' scumread. Why dont i see you questioning them to confirm it?
VOTE: jerobbo --> this says my FoS

I have a couple of possibles on my list, yes. Nothing that currently warrants further investigation, just things I'm keeping my eye on. When I feel it's time to share then don't worry I will.

No firstly, i am not asking you to throw your vote around. Secondly, vote can be used for pressure. What do you mean by "voting is a means to an end"?

And you seriously thinks that there is "Nothing that currently warrants further investigation"?

[jerobbo]

No firstly, i am not asking you to throw your vote around. Secondly, vote can be used for pressure. What do you mean by "voting is a means to an end"?

And you seriously thinks that there is "Nothing that currently warrants further investigation"?

Then we agree. My vote was random, we are no longer in the RVS therefore I unvoted because it was no longer valid. Voting is a means to an end - it means what it says, you use it to achieve your goal, in the case of Mafia, lynching scum.

After my questions to Nacho, I don't have anything I want to investigate further currently. What's so hard to believe about that? I'm not so egotistical that I think I know everything about Mafia after a month, I'm still watching and learning.

[enomis]

No firstly, i am not asking you to throw your vote around. Secondly, vote can be used for pressure. What do you mean by "voting is a means to an end"?

And you seriously thinks that there is "Nothing that currently warrants further investigation"?

Then we agree. My vote was random, we are no longer in the RVS therefore I unvoted because it was no longer valid. Voting is a means to an end - it means what it says, you use it to achieve your goal, in the case of Mafia, lynching scum.

After my questions to Nacho, I don't have anything I want to investigate further currently. What's so hard to believe about that? I'm not so egotistical that I think I know everything about Mafia after a month, I'm still watching and learning.

....Where did i say you are egotistical. I am asking if you think that there is "nothing that currently warrants further investigation". There are a bunch of other things happening right now and you think none of them warrants further investigation?

[jerobbo]

You didn't, I offered it myself.

There are plenty of things happening and I'm paying attention and making notes. I have nothing to add currently. What don't you understand about that?

[hasdgfas]

Fin