thomith wrote:that by using slandaars logic about only knowing werewolf mechanics but not mafia mechanics that he "must be a werewolf"
2 scum teams wolf and maf... I assumed both had a nk.
What do you think town would assume?
Manipulative; trying to get people (ash) to vote me then fueling the fire and keeping options open to vote me later while also making sure you were not part of it by staying with your pl vote in case it went bad. It did.
You are trying to get votes on me while not voting me yourself. Manipulative.
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:15 pm
by Thomith
Fair point about the assumption thing, i guess town would assume both scum had a nk but im not trying to get ash to vote YOU specifically, i am saying that town want to use their vote for pressure, and he should vote who he suspects, its not like im saying "OH YEAH VOTE SLANDAAR" specifically i am saying he should vote who he suspects if he thinks they are scum.
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:25 pm
by Slandaar
Yes and technically you are right.
But in conjunction with your little fire fuelling it is being manipulative. Coincidence? maybe. I dont like coincidences though.
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:26 pm
by drmyshotgun
Slandaar has been jumping votes all over the place. Why react such way Thomith?
Posted: Wed Apr 04, 2012 11:27 pm
by Thomith
If i get accused i try to prove the accusation wrong because i know i am town.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:03 am
by asher1611
I will be V/LA Today (4/5) through Sunday (4/8)
I will be checking this by phone though, I just won't be able to post.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:23 am
by Kassadin
Thats wat slandaar has been doing all game
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:26 am
by Thomith
kass do you have any reads so far?
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:27 am
by Kassadin
I want slandaar lynched :
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:30 am
by Thomith
care to explain why? So far this game you have done very little, and all i have seen is you voting slandaar post 1 and then not changing it with little reasons why it stayed.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:38 am
by Kassadin
read wat he has done too
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:41 am
by Thomith
idk, i guess slandaar has been votehopping but doesn't he always do that? I don't like that for most of the votes (other than the one on me) he hasn't really explained them, but i still want you to tell my why he is scum, as telling me to look over him isn't explaining.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:22 am
by Ravel
asher's VLA noted
BagSquad and iDanyboy have just been prodded
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:32 am
by Slandaar
Which votes havnt I explained Thomith?
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:34 am
by Thomith
What i meant by that is you don't explain the vote in the post you vote or posts before you vote, the bag vote is an example of this.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 2:58 am
by Slandaar
And how was my vote on you different then?
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:04 am
by vijay2vasandani
@Thomith: that was lolcasm. What are your thoughts on kondi?
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:09 am
by Thomith
i don't see anything that is really different about kondi than there normally is, but the last post (about lurker town lose game as town but good if he is scum) could be read as being town trying to get people to post or WIFOMing scum trying to look like that.
you had a reason which i feel was the only real good reason for voting me than the others, as the others were not really explained at all, even if you had to be pushed to explain your vote on me, i felt it was the only vote which had a decent reason.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:12 am
by Slandaar
That is not what you said. You clearly were insinuating something completely different originally
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 3:16 am
by Thomith
Ok what im saying is that some of your votes like bag and shotgun you dont explain it when you vote and when you are pushed to explain it it isn't that good of a reason, but on me it was different, as when pushed you had an ok reason.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 7:56 am
by Thomith
Looking back i explained it wrong as to what i meant, but what i just posted is what i intended to begin with.
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 9:47 am
by drmyshotgun
Does Kass get useless points too Slandaar?
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:43 pm
by Chrimi
Slandaar is playing great at getting reactions.
However, I don't like the way he is doing it.
I have a town read on Slandaar, but he really needs to not act the way he is, because it's very anti-town.
And Slandaar, if you're going to try and reaction test, please make it a little more subtle. The manipulativeness was 0 in what he was saying, and based on your vocabulary and gameplay so far I am assuming you knew that and was only reaction-testing.
If you were reaction-testing, town read. You may be trying to get whatever you can on other people, which would be much scummier.
Ugh, I'm not used to this kind of gameplay. Alright, let's see here...
Until I get some kind of response that is noteworthy and explains well, I shall... VOTE: Slandaar
Posted: Thu Apr 05, 2012 1:46 pm
by Chrimi
Hmm, I didn't get anything off of v2v, which is therefore scummy.
I know this sounds odd, but from his town play I've seen lots of stuff that sticks out VERY town or VERY scummy, and to get a lot of null reads off of him is not of the town meta I'm used to, and therefore scummy.
Not enough to invoke even an fos, or even worth mentioning, just thought I would put it out there.
Then again, it's been quite a few games since I've last played with him and I myself have changed my style quite a bit, I wouldn't be surprised if he had too...