Page 6 of 19
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:33 am
by izakthegoomba
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:36 am
by Tierce
izakthegoomba
(6) - scotmany12, Cogito Ergo Sum, Glork, saulres, Chimera, Mortontfrh
Xalxe
(2) - vijay2vasandani, Fritzler
Fritzler
(1) - izakthegoomba
Mortontfrh
(1) - Shadoweh
Guy_Named_Riggs
(0) -
Xalxe
Not voting
(2) - Guy_Named_Riggs, Xalxe
With 12 alive, it takes 7 votes to lynch.
The deadline is June 2 at 1:30 AM GMT (DST). Countdown to deadline: (expired on 2012-06-02 01:30:00)
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:47 am
by Xalxe
↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:No, it's not. Asking dumb questions isn't scumhunting, ineffective or otherwise.
There is a difference between "dumb questions," which in my mind are RQS, and asking questions about specific behavior, which is what I did.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:48 am
by Xalxe
↑ Mortontfrh wrote: ↑ izakthegoomba wrote:There is no point to scumhunting if you don't intend to catch scum. Unless you're scum hoping that scumhunting will make you look like town, of course.
Yeah instead of scumhunting we should just sit around and give soft reads until other people take the lead for us. Especially the kind of soft reads that come from scum just trying to make look like town.
I really do hope this is a sarcastic post.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:52 am
by Glork
Hey Xalxe, if you bus your scum buddy right now, I promise I won't hypothetically vig you tonight.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:53 am
by Mortontfrh
It was sarcastic, I was implying that Izak's behavior was just as scummy as what he was harping on.
Xalxe you said you were withholding your vote until you looked further into Glork. It's been at least a day now, why is your vote still on no one? Or at the very least, who are your current scum reads?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:54 am
by Xalxe
↑ Mortontfrh wrote:It was sarcastic, I was implying that Izak's behavior was just as scummy as what he was harping on.
Xalxe you said you were withholding your vote until you looked further into Glork. It's been at least a day now, why is your vote still on no one? Or at the very least, who are your current scum reads?
'cause I didn't do it yet.
↑ Glork wrote:Hey Xalxe, if you bus your scum buddy right now, I promise I won't hypothetically vig you tonight.
Glork, you legitimately sadden me.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 10:56 am
by Cogito Ergo Sum
↑ Xalxe wrote: ↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:No, it's not. Asking dumb questions isn't scumhunting, ineffective or otherwise.
There is a difference between "dumb questions," which in my mind are RQS, and asking questions about specific behavior, which is what I did.
This is a remarkably oblique defense.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:00 am
by Xalxe
↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote: ↑ Xalxe wrote: ↑ Cogito Ergo Sum wrote:No, it's not. Asking dumb questions isn't scumhunting, ineffective or otherwise.
There is a difference between "dumb questions," which in my mind are RQS, and asking questions about specific behavior, which is what I did.
This is a remarkably oblique defense.
I didn't think I had to spell out my point. I'm a fan of show, not tell. But just for you:
I wasn't asking dumb questions, I was attempting to investigate specific behavior to see people's answers/reactions. I find it interesting to note that in fact they were ignored in favor of piling votes on me.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:18 am
by Glork
Also, why have you failed entirely to respond to the actual post in which I explained why you're scum, and chosen only to respond to the snarky comments I've made on the side?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:25 am
by Glork
PS, I posted 129 specifically because you ignored my 123, even while responding to the post immediately following it.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:25 am
by Cogito Ergo Sum
Do you know what oblique means? Because I think you're misunderstanding my remark. A direct approach would be e.g. to explain why the answers to those questions would tell us something about the players answering them. Instead you basically define "dumb questions" as being RQS-type questions and then suggest that your questions can't be dumb because they're not RQS-type questions.
↑ Xalxe wrote:I find it interesting to note that in fact they were ignored in favor of piling votes on me.
Really? Because it seems like a pretty straightforward phenomenon to me.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:31 am
by Glork
Also, why has izak not fakeclaimed yet?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:34 am
by izakthegoomba
That confuses me.
Let's say I'm scum for a moment. Why the fuck would I want to fakeclaim this early?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:40 am
by Glork
Because of you don't, you will be hammered? Quit stalling, scumbag.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 11:42 am
by Glork
Let me put it this way. One of Fritz's favorite things in the world is dropping hammers on people. You are at L-1 and he is not voting you. If you don't want to die the immediate second he reads this thread, you'd better convince *SOMEONE* that you are protown.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 12:19 pm
by izakthegoomba
If fritz is enough of a dick to hammer me right now, he is free to do so. I'm not claiming.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 5:48 pm
by Mortontfrh
Mod: Can we get a prod on Fritz, please?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 5:53 pm
by Tierce
Fritzler is V/LA, as announced here:
↑ Fritzler wrote:I am starting a cross country road trip tomorrow. Hopefully I will be able to leech wi-fi and insult you all. However, there is an equal chance that I will be in some sort of hazy confusion in Albuquerque, New Mexico. So you know, FYI.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:22 pm
by saulres
Glork
: In what way is
97 a statement coming from a townie?
Xalxe
: In 102 you unvote GNR saying you want to wait to get a response from Glork. At the time you were the only vote on GNR. What was the point of the unvote?
I have too many scumreads/leaning scum this game. I'm going to unvote (at the start of a line for our mod) until I can figure out which are the top 3. Probably Thursday but maybe tomorrow if I'm lucky.
UNVOTE:
Incidentally...
@Mod
: Fritzler's V/LA: There's no end date in that. How long do you anticipate giving him before looking for a replacement? I'm not fond of the idea of going to night when we're down somebody and that person could be our vig.
... But I
am
fond of going to night when we're down somebody and that person could be the SK. Argh! Catch-22!
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:27 pm
by Mortontfrh
I have too many scumreads/leaning scum this game. I'm going to unvote (at the start of a line for our mod) until I can figure out which are the top 3. Probably Thursday but maybe tomorrow if I'm lucky.
For clarification: Are you saying that Izak's no longer scummy, or more so that so many people are scummy that you need to prioritize who should be lynched first?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 6:28 pm
by Tierce
↑ saulres wrote:@Mod
: Fritzler's V/LA: There's no end date in that. How long do you anticipate giving him before looking for a replacement? I'm not fond of the idea of going to night when we're down somebody and that person could be our vig.
... But I
am
fond of going to night when we're down somebody and that person could be the SK. Argh! Catch-22!
I'll give him some leeway the next couple of days. If night falls during Fritzler's V/LA, I will deal with it then.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 8:03 pm
by Glork
↑ saulres wrote:Glork
: In what way is
97 a statement coming from a townie?
In what way is it not coming from a townie?
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:23 pm
by vijay2vasandani
↑ izakthegoomba wrote:If fritz is enough of a dick to hammer me right now, he is free to do so. I'm not claiming.
Sooooooo pro-town.
Posted: Tue May 22, 2012 9:38 pm
by izakthegoomba
Really, vijay? Do you not see why claiming at this point would be ridiculously anti-town?