ewo2 (1): nhammen
nhammen (1): ewo2
Paschendale (1): JohnnyFarrar
Venrob (3): Cheery Dog, Paschendale, Wiibox3
Not voting (3): jambecca, Venrob, MissMaggot
With
Day 1 ends in (expired on 2012-09-09 10:13:01).
↑ Venrob wrote:Well im late. Seems 2 good places to put my vote, both ill have an explaination for...
IC bw, just for being an IC. IC makes good town, but much better scum!
RQS starter bw.
RQS-RANDOM QUESTIONING STAGE
RQS can help the maf in more ways than are obvious.
1.Questions on playstyle for one: maf might look at their answer, maybe find something off from how they are playing? People play different with different roles. Maf might sniff out a power role!
2.Answers containing accidental softclaims:
Not often, but ive seen RQS with an unintentional softclaim, then the maf killed them. Doctor died that way.
Out of these BW's, i go with 2.
Vote: Nekoko
THIS IS AN L-1 VOTE.
if i counted right.
↑ Wiibox3 wrote:As for the point of not supporting a wagon before everyone has posted yet, I thought I was pretty clear as to why I didn't, though you said it was a scummy reason. But one thing I have learned from my last couple games is that it is that scum likes to try and make town players look scummy early in the first day. This same thing happened in my last game here on mafiascum that one of the SEs called me scummy for voting an OMGUS vote in the RVS, he turned out to be Mafia in the end.
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:I happen to find this bit of your post to be the scummiest sentence so far this game, but it's not enough for me to move my vote.
↑ JohnnyFarrar wrote:nhammen is doing what skilled scum often do: ask a lot of questions without actually taking many stances. Quick, somebody tell me what he thinks of anybody not called rob or ewo? you can't.
↑ nhammen wrote:
It looks to me like his play in that game (where he is town) closely matched his play here. Other than the lurking from Tuesday to Saturday anyways.↑ Cheery Dog wrote:I just looked in your threads (on this site) and found that you were in newbie 1265, though I notice you were replaced out, it does show how you started another game as town.
↑ ewo2 wrote:In post 119, Wiibox3 wrote:Maybe, or this could be a very good scum play. He may have read the rules closely and noticed pre-day 1 talk was only mentioned in the PM. So if someone asked the mod, or noticed the PM he could say he totally missed it. This would be a great way to clear him in the eyes of the town.
That would be a huge stretch.
↑ nhammen wrote:
Are you worried about the possibility of Pasch being semi-confirmed?↑ Wiibox3 wrote:Maybe, or this could be a very good scum play. He may have read the rules closely and noticed pre-day 1 talk was only mentioned in the PM. So if someone asked the mod, or noticed the PM he could say he totally missed it. This would be a great way to clear him in the eyes of the town.
↑ JohnnyFarrar wrote:Why is 53 scummy?
↑ Paschendale wrote:think I'd be making a mistake in pursuing a lynch on you... which is why I didn't vote for you.
But trust me, a lot of townies are going to suspect you for things you don't think you're doing. And they're going to vote for you. And they're going to lynch you.
↑ JohnnyFarrar wrote:
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:I happen to find this bit of your post to be the scummiest sentence so far this game, but it's not enough for me to move my vote.
But no vote?
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:↑ JohnnyFarrar wrote:
↑ Cheery Dog wrote:I happen to find this bit of your post to be the scummiest sentence so far this game, but it's not enough for me to move my vote.
But no vote?
I said in that same post that it wasn't enough to vote my vote, treat it as a FoS if you like.
Why are you suggesting I should have contradicted myself and actually voted?
↑ nhammen wrote:First off, your reads have been repeatedly been perfectly aligned with the largest wagons in the game. Scum sometimes use this tactic as a way to hide from the town. They don't have to give real reads; all they have to do is agree with the town, and A) they don't have to put as much effort into looking townie, because they are following real townies, B) they don't have to put as much effort into faking reads, because the reads are all right there for them. Secondly, you gave a whole list of reasons why your read on wiibox became a nullread, and then used this as your reason for unvoting nekoko. This indicates to me that you forgot who you were actually voting for. And I do not see any townie forgetting who they are voting for like that.
↑ JohnnyFarrar wrote:nhammen, 57 caused me to notice that you haven't actually taken a stance on anyone yet. Your votes are only pressure votes so far and you haven't outwardly stated any opinion. Would you like to? (That's nice guy talk for gimme your reads. Ignore this if you actually did later)
Imma go iso myself to prove you wrong. One moment.↑ JohnnyFarrar wrote:nhammen is doing what skilled scum often do: ask a lot of questions without actually taking many stances. Quick, somebody tell me what he thinks of anybody not called rob or ewo? you can't.
Note: this is before #57, where you said that I have not given any reads yet.↑ nhammen wrote:Both Wiibox and Paschendale are slightly scummy (but it is very slight) because they avoided voting for the competing wagons after I said that the competing wagons would help us find scum. Additionally MissMaggot's reactions are every transparent, so I give her major townpoints. CheeryDog asked a very relevant question which gives minor townpoints.