Mafiascum.net

So you claim that for this game you "changed" your town-meta to look like your scum-meta from 115?

↑ serrapaladin wrote:So you claim that for this game you "changed" your town-meta to look like your scum-meta from 115?

I don't say that. Why you think I do that?

↑ Lincolm wrote:

↑ serrapaladin wrote:Lincoln looks scummy, his 33 is exactly what he did as scum in Micro 115, which just finished - trying to leave RVS by declaring a vote "no longer random" for towncred. Haven't seen him do it as town. 44 is a rather weak retroactive justification.

I like to chance my meta every time, so no. Well, you will see this I do it as town.

Your post 33 is something you have only done as scum before. After I call you out on it, you claim that you change your meta every time, which is why your meta now looks like your scum-meta from Micro 115 - that's a horrible retroactive excuse.

Can be. I also do it as town. You can see my scum play and town play also. Compared by all of that, you will see that my meta different.

Here you are. The Mafia with the Vengeance

That reads differently though. Stating "I'm Mafia, Discuss!" that early doesn't strike me as you trying to pick up town-cred for helping leave RVS, whereas your posting here and in 115 does.

Why you took it so long?

No, there is the similarity. I don't like RVS get too long in game (whatever you think in that 115 Micro). I like to give a discussion.

Because this isn't the only tab I have open? Leaving RVS is, of course, a good thing, but the way you attempted to do it here and in 115 made you seem as though you're trying to gather town-cred by appearing to make an effort to leave RVS, while not actually contributing much to useful discussion. As scum, you don't have an actual incentive to leave RVS, but you have an incentive to look as though you're trying to. In Micro 115 you were, in fact, scum, so my reasoning is that you are scum here, too.

I don't contribute too much in discussion because the activity crippling. Do I should push it? See the activity before. Why you don't try to see it?

Even my "I'm mafia", you think that I try to discuss hard? No. I tried it, but I could not get the correct discussion because the activity also.

In other fact, you try to use meta for solid tell. Why?

Whats with all of this unvoting and not voting for someone else?

Who is the scummiest player? Put your vote on the best suspect.

Lincolm, I'm not using my generic impression of your meta for a tell, I'm saying how a specific post of yours could have scum motivation and I'm using a very specific occurrence where you did the same thing and were scum to substantiate that read.

↑ serrapaladin wrote:Lincolm, I'm not using my generic impression of your meta for a tell, I'm saying how a specific post of yours could have scum motivation and I'm using a very specific occurrence where you did the same thing and were scum to substantiate that read.

idgi

You said this :

Lincoln looks scummy, his 33 is exactly what he did as scum in Micro 115, which just finished -

trying to leave RVS by declaring a vote "no longer random" for towncred

.

Is this what you mean by scum motivation? If yes and you aren't scum in here, I never do that again for the rest of my life.

It just like you tell me I don't know that trying to leave RVS is town tell or scum tell. It is null tell for me. I already know that. That's why I do it. Don't care my alignment, I just want to the game keep going.

And also I wasn't substantiate that read, in here or in there. Maybe you forgot the continuation of what I said in there.

What's this? Argue about Meta changes and scumlessness? Lets not

Wait, what? A good idea from slimer? CONFSCUM.

In seriousness, this isn't something that's going to lead to a satisfying conclusion. I'd be inclined to drop the subject in favor of some discussion on... damn.

At any rate, serra's Town enough for now, am interested in another slot so

Hmm, I believe you for now, Lincolm, but EGMOY...
UNVOTE:

GM: wanna explain your GNR vote? tay's leaving is suspicious, but we can't get any answers out of GNR regarding that.
Carey: do you really think NS was only being stupid with his fakehammer? I don't see any particular reason for scum to do that.
Lincolm: what/who did you mean by "this thread is becoming scum daytalk" in 112?

I felt that NS was playing a stupid prank to confuse people, which is not cool.

Carey: Are you familiar with the concept of a reaction test?

But what incentive does scum have to temporarily confuse people in exchange for high exposure?

I'm particularly concerned given:

↑ CareyHammer wrote:I won't be unvoting you anytime soon.

↑ CareyHammer wrote:Asshole!
UNVOTE: Lincolm
VOTE: N. S.

P-Edit, NS: you should really have let him come up with that on his own.

But, serra, he already stated what he felt I was doing. I got the impression that he wasn't going to be thinking about it any further. So I told him.

↑ Nobody Special wrote:Carey: Are you familiar with the concept of a reaction test?

No. Please explain. like I'm 5 years old.

ELI5 Reaction Test:

A:

Me: "Timmy, there's a bug in your hair!"

Timmy: "Cool! Where? What kind?"

B:

Me: "Timmy, there's a bug in your hair!"




This is how we determine whether Timmy is afraid of bugs or not.


To get an explanation of how this relates to what I did, please insert another quarter.

I'd upvote

<inserts quarter>

If Timmy were playing a game where he was supposed to be pretending that he wasn't afraid of bugs, telling him there's a bug in his hair might tell us whether he was, in reality, afraid of bugs or not. Sometimes when someone is told something, they react naturally, and forget that they are playing a game and are supposed to be pretending something.

Got it now?

Ermagerd bergs

So what did you think of Carey's reaction, NS?