Mafiascum.net

In post 111, RachMarie wrote:fery just open up a 2nd browser and log in on the hydra on that one that way you dont keep doing that lol.

That doesn't help if you accidentally post from the wrong browser window.

- b

In post 102, RedCoyote wrote:

Mod

, how many of these lovely pictures do you have? I love these sort of jokes.

Too many.

Vote Count 1.05

RedCoyote

( 0 )

²

( 3 ) goodmorning , A_Stone , RedCoyote

A_Stone

( 2 ) thenewearth , syndromeofatown

thenewearth

( 0 )

syndromeofatown

( 1 ) Mr E Roll

Mr E Roll

( 0 )

goodmorning

( 1 ) RachMarie

RachMarie

( 0 )

Rondar

( 0 )

Not voting:

² , Rondar

With 9 alive, it takes 5 to lynch.

Deadline is in

goodmorning is LA until Tuesday.
A_Stone is V/LA until Wednesday.

In post 101, RedCoyote wrote: It's the truth, Rach. He's flooding the thread with silliness. He's overcompensating to make it look as though he has a strong presence. Sometimes two heads are better than one, but I do not need to see a Hydra posting something and then the second head confirming what the first head says. Less is more.

I don’t think anybody is flooding this thread with silliness or anything else. In fact I think the activity level as a whole is low, I’m hoping when the v/las are over and Rondar’s slot shows up that things pick up.

In post 112, syndromeofatown wrote:The main thing is he's used a whole lot of words to say a whole lot of nothing (at least nothing relevant to the game/finding scum) and his RVS vote seems... overreasoned I guess would be the word?

Why so reluctant to share your opinion? First your posting in 29 where you claim to find scum with no explanation and then in 108 where you tried to pass it off as just gut feeling? I’m not really feeling your case but at least it’s out in the open now.

In post 119, goodmorning wrote:

In post 112, syndromeofatown wrote:his RVS vote seems... overreasoned I guess would be the word?

He made a space pun. That's your definition of over-reasoning? Interesting.

When I first read Stone’s RV I thought it was based on him thinking 2’s posts were “spaced out”. I totally missed the avatar connection until he pointed it out. I wonder if Syndrome is finding the double meaning “over reasoned”?

Do you think I am making a mountain out of a molehill, MRE? Or do you even think it's a molehill?

In post 127, Mr E Roll wrote:When I first read Stone’s RV I thought it was based on him thinking 2’s posts were “spaced out”. I totally missed the avatar connection until he pointed it out. I wonder if Syndrome is finding the double meaning “over reasoned”?

Interesting.

Coyote, GM, A_stone: Why are you guys still voting squared? I think I missed that part

Why not be? I think I missed that part.

ETL hi :3

Welcome ETL. cool avatar.

- f

YAY

ETL

now we should see some activity ....

Hi all, i'm replacing (someone). I will be studying for two finals I have tomorrow but will be active and caught up 100% after tomorrow night.

In post 128, RedCoyote wrote:Do you think I am making a mountain out of a molehill, MRE? Or do you even think it's a molehill?

Depends, how certain are you that 2 is scum? You seem to think that 2 has been active lurking that’s a legitimate reason for a vote especially considering you haven’t noted anything else that you have found to be suspicious.

Can you explain what you meant by “Less is more”? Is that a general belief you have or something specific to hydras?

Tne ignored my question :[

In post 138, goodmorning wrote:Tne ignored my question :[

Maybe he will answer mine.

Thenewearth , why are all your questions centered around why somebody is voting certain people? It looks to me like you are trying to find a safe reason to move your random vote without arousing suspicions.

In post 139, Mr E Roll wrote:Thenewearth , why are all your questions centered around why somebody is voting certain people? It looks to me like you are trying to find a safe reason to move your random vote without arousing suspicions.

lolwat

Because they don't give reasons.

At least I'm honest that mine is an RVS

In addition to that...

"Oh I find this guy scummy and I'll vote him" --> "Why? What's so scummy" --> "Not telling"

We can't make the ball roll when someone doesn't pushes it

In post 140, syndromeofatown wrote:

In post 139, Mr E Roll wrote:Thenewearth , why are all your questions centered around why somebody is voting certain people? It looks to me like you are trying to find a safe reason to move your random vote without arousing suspicions.

lolwat

What I meant was that TNE’s questions don’t really look like scum hunting to me. It more looks like he is trying to piggyback off of somebody else’s scum hunting. If he doesn’t find anybody scummy maybe it’s because he knows they are town.

In post 142, thenewearth wrote:In addition to that...

"Oh I find this guy scummy and I'll vote him" --> "Why? What's so scummy" --> "Not telling"

We can't make the ball roll when someone doesn't pushes it

Asking a question and then just accepting the answer like you did with SOAT is not what I would call pushing. I think you are trying to get town credit for something you’re not really doing.



VOTE: Thenewearth

In post 104, ² wrote:I think that having the second head confirming is pro-town. By not doing it we could,i if we were scum, pretend that the second head got a different perspective on something and backpeddal out of an unfortunate situation/read.

- b

I'm mostly caught up. This post is troubling. Why did 2 feel the need to point out that their playstyle was "pro-town".

Then, followed by this to SoaT, who was already giving me scumvibes:

In post 123, ² wrote:I think I've made it pretty clear already what I want you to do, and I don't buy that you've somehow missed it.

- b

Ignoring my question twice, not pursuing any real conversation with his questions, seems like a good enough reason for so early in a fluffpost game.

Questions about the motivation behind a vote are a good way to find the scum, IMO.

Sure, if you actually care about the answer.

(Hint: If you don't, you're Scum)