Posted: Mon May 06, 2013 10:50 am
Why is your vote still on me?
i am liking it there for now...In post 125, Nero Cain wrote:Why is your vote still on me?
This also blows. Varsoon is right (though he went about it in the wrong way) that we should get out of RVS ASAP 'cause short deadline + lurky playerlist. This makes is look like Angel wants to stay in RVS wich benefits scum a heckava lot more than town.In post 44, ArcAngel9 wrote:Why do you think it is necessary to move out from RVS on page 2 itself, like you said not all the players aren't here yet.. What's the hurry...In post 30, Varsoon wrote:Six players posted out of seven, and most of the posts were RVS vote parking and speculation.In post 29, Hiraki wrote:I'm super glad you checked that everyone else posted frequently yesterday.In post 27, Varsoon wrote:It's more along the lines of the idea that there's just seven players and they're not incredibly active so far. I'm just as guilty of this as you guys are. Yeah, it's RVS, but things can be said.
Unvote, Vote: Varsoon
This is scum trying to act helpful.
Just trying to take the game into a direction, although I don't like how fast my wagon is building. Hiraki, do you feel pressure to start a new wagon up since yours is at 2 votes coming out of RVS?
I understand your disappointment about your early wagon but if you realize that it is you who pushed for it..
Nero, remember what I said about throwing everything at a wall to see what sticks?In post 133, Nero Cain wrote:but Oro should prob be the lynch today. Dude lurked like 4 days and then swoops in and echo's Varsoon + and puts me ay l-1.
vote:Oro
In post 136, Empking wrote:Vote Count 6
Nero Cain (3) - ArcAngel9, Varsoon, orozorro,
Varsoon (2) - The Acting Method, JacobSavage
JacobSavage (1) - Hiraki
orozorro (1) - Nero Cain
In post 138, Varsoon wrote:In post 136, Empking wrote:Vote Count 6
Nero Cain (3) - ArcAngel9, Varsoon, orozorro,
Varsoon (2) - The Acting Method, JacobSavage
JacobSavage (1) - Hiraki
orozorro (1) - Nero Cain
Can you include how many votes it takes to lynch?
I'll have to consider that. Honestly, it seems like you're trying to get me off your wagon, but it is a bit suspicious that Oro would make that sort of play after a few days of being absent. What contradictions are you talking about?In post 137, Nero Cain wrote:Hence why scum echo since you'll be less likely to suspect Oro.
Given there are 2 scum in this game, I don't see why its bad that I'm speculating a Oro/AA team.
AA seems to have a high fluff count and is being glib and OMGUSy. Its not good town play, imo. Could she be town? Maybe. Its not like everyone with bad town play flips scum that's why I'm thinkin' we lynch oro. Also note the contradictions in his post.
You could have always said, "You haven't necessarily done it with me, but in X game you did."In post 120, Nero Cain wrote:Its against site rules to discuss ongoing games. He specifically said "Because I don't recall doing so ever in a game with you".In post 115, orozorro wrote:
Nero: his claim against TAM in 59 was pretty baseless and he then refused to back it up when requested.
Yes, as town I should be perfectly fine with me mislynch.In post 140, Varsoon wrote:I'll have to consider that. Honestly, it seems like you're trying to get me off your wagon, but it is a bit suspicious that Oro would make that sort of play after a few days of being absent. What contradictions are you talking about?In post 137, Nero Cain wrote:Hence why scum echo since you'll be less likely to suspect Oro.
Given there are 2 scum in this game, I don't see why its bad that I'm speculating a Oro/AA team.
AA seems to have a high fluff count and is being glib and OMGUSy. Its not good town play, imo. Could she be town? Maybe. Its not like everyone with bad town play flips scum that's why I'm thinkin' we lynch oro. Also note the contradictions in his post.
All I can really say is no.In post 109, Varsoon wrote: Just seems to be throwing things at the town wall and seeing what sticks. Really scummy method of play.
Every time he writes 'kill', it reads as hard scumbluffing to me. Most town'll say lynch. Could be reaction testing on his part, though.
Lots of posts put accusations but no pressure, like he's waiting for others to start up a wagon based on what he's said. Here's some examples of suspicion put down without a vote: 22, 23, 26, 32, 34, 37, 59, 71, 84, 88, 97...
I don't like his rationale behind his vote on TAM and I don't like the baiting he's been doing. Furthermore, the quick swap to AA9 when the TAM wagon didn't pick up speed reads as really scummy to me.
@Jacob: I'd like to know why you plant a vote rather than "X is scum".
Just planting votes does nothing for town.
Cmon Nero, You still haven't given real reasons for voting me. You seriously expect me to see you as town?In post 128, Nero Cain wrote:Oh so 'cause I speculated that you could be scum and I'm scum for this. Ok yeah, Angel is scum.
last time i check, my vote was on you befor you voted me.In post 132, Nero Cain wrote:If anyone OMGUSed its Angel.
How does lynching a bad town player helps you win the game? you're contradicting to the win condition Nero.In post 137, Nero Cain wrote:AA seems to have a high fluff count and is being glib and OMGUSy. Its not good town play, imo. Could she be town? Maybe. Its not like everyone with bad town play flips scum that's why I'm thinkin' we lynch oro. Also note the contradictions in his post.