Page 6 of 29
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:12 pm
by Sugar Cain
:/
I said I didn't want that vote Nero
Mainly cause I'm actually getting a town read on Ffery
VOTE: TIP
I was happy with this one, and still want out vote to stay there. He's tried to fabricate a theory on why our vote was on him and tried to paint it something... not sure what it was
His little talk with Nero reads forced non-chalance and his apology is... Awkward
Ffery, talk to me why are we scummy? I'm getting the feeling that it's large Ineffective? What are you seeing in the posts that are mostly made by Nero?
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:13 pm
by Sugar Cain
~Sugar
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:18 pm
by TheIrishPope
I wasn't out of RVS because nothing was happening and no one was posting. I guess we're getting somewhere now. Maybe tne being scared is worth commenting on?
I don't have reads, again, because no one is posting. I can't formulate reads out of thin air.
PEdit: What theory have I fabricated? Misreading means I'm scum? I was unaware of this. You guys should tell me these kinds of things more often.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:21 pm
by Sugar Cain
No, but responses like that make me think that I'm right
~Sugar
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:33 pm
by TheIrishPope
But do you have proof?
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 4:46 pm
by NoEffenCllue
In post 125, Sugar Cain wrote::/
I said I didn't want that vote Nero
Mainly cause I'm actually getting a town read on Ffery
VOTE: TIP
I was happy with this one, and still want out vote to stay there. He's tried to fabricate a theory on why our vote was on him and tried to paint it something... not sure what it was
His little talk with Nero reads forced non-chalance and his apology is... Awkward
Ffery, talk to me why are we scummy? I'm getting the feeling that it's large Ineffective? What are you seeing in the posts that are mostly made by Nero?
You have a town read on me? how so?
- f
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:08 pm
by Sugar Cain
Meta.
this reads nothing like Poetic or Popcorn, and I see fair more amount of Ffery Polygamist play. I am also not seeing popcorn Ineffective here
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:08 pm
by Sugar Cain
~Sugar
I hate remembering to sign >.>
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:18 pm
by DoctorPepper
You dont have reads yet you want everyone to give out theirs? Logic right there ladies and gentlemen
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:21 pm
by TheIrishPope
Yes. Is there something wrong with not having reads with only 5 pages?
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:23 pm
by DoctorPepper
Not really. But asking reads from everyone else while not giving your own, is kinda sketchy. Not to mention asking for everyone to contribute while still claiming to be in RVS, if you want something to happen, then take initiative and dont wait for everyone else around here to do it for you.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:28 pm
by TheIrishPope
Well, do you have any reads?
And you telling me to make something happen will only lead to wild accusations of my intentions and behaviors.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:32 pm
by DoctorPepper
I have limited reads, will ISO everyone probably later tonight.
You being so concerned with how your actions will be perceived is bad town at best and scummy at worst.
Yep, this is leading to nowhere.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:35 pm
by NoEffenCllue
In post 131, Sugar Cain wrote:Meta.
this reads nothing like Poetic or Popcorn, and I see fair more amount of Ffery Polygamist play. I am also not seeing popcorn Ineffective here
I'm not playing to my MS town meta in this game. neither is Ineffective. If we were, the thread would be a hell of a lot longer than 6 pages. Perhaps even more alarming is my vote. I have always been very slow to put down a vote at MS and I usually telegraph my intentions well before the vote. An unsupported vote on page 3 should raise the neck hairs of anyone who knows my on-site meta.
I am intentionally following my non-MS style of play in this game. I'll probably be playing more like this than like my prior MS games in the future if, as I expect, it's effective.
So, your townreading me is giving me a bad case of hives.
But, that's not all!
After the Cain head skirmished with us a bit nearly 48 hours ago, Sugar Cain went silent. When next we heard from Sugar Cain, it was your post, which came across premeditated and thoughtful, and even like an appeal or truce flag.
All of this, and I haven't touched on what originally drew our vote. Nor will I for now.
- f
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 5:50 pm
by NoEffenCllue
In every game i have played on MS my opening involves an awkward debate with someone and an agressive posture or some silly reaction test that nobody likes. My scumgame on popcorn was an intentional duplication of that. Ffer hates voting early but is similar in the level of early involvement to get the game moving as town. Niether one of us have displayed anything that could meta-tell us as town... If you were to try to meta read us you should come up with something as being entirely unusual
as one mind we have discussed and agree on every point
-i
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 6:03 pm
by Aeris
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 6:04 pm
by Aeris
In post 127, TheIrishPope wrote:I wasn't out of RVS because nothing was happening and no one was posting. I guess we're getting somewhere now. Maybe tne being scared is worth commenting on?
I don't have reads, again, because no one is posting. I can't formulate reads out of thin air.
PEdit: What theory have I fabricated? Misreading means I'm scum? I was unaware of this. You guys should tell me these kinds of things more often.
Everyone but maestro has posted. you don't have one town or scum read?
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 6:39 pm
by NoEffenCllue
In post 137, DoctorPepper wrote:I have limited reads, will ISO everyone probably later tonight.
You being so concerned with how your actions will be perceived is bad town at best and scummy at worst.
Yep, this is leading to nowhere.
why would you need to iso such a short game?
Wouldnt it be better to read everything in context?
This game is going nowhere because nobody has sheep us yet
-i
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:21 pm
by Sugar Cain
Right here sweetheart. Did ya miss me?
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 7:27 pm
by Sugar Cain
Why do you think its impossible for scum to attack me?
In post 122, Aeris wrote: In post 112, NoEffenCllue wrote: In post 110, Aeris wrote:I don't have any clue what noeffenclue is seeing in Sugar Cain, but I think noeffenclue is town. Need to see more from Sugar Cain to determine their alignment.
We feel pretty damn confident about what we're seeing in their posts so far.
Roughly how much game experience do you have with Ms Marangal and Nero Cain? Can you usually get an accurate read one or both? Assuming you can answer that without compromising your main.
- f
Not really any with Ms. Marangal other than what I've read. A couple games with Nero. I think I can get an accurate read on Nero, and that neither of them has been posting is pretty disconcerting.
We've both been pretty active but I didn't post ITT since Mara hasn't been on the whole day and you know, its hard to discuss things with your hydra buddy until they actually get on.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 8:55 pm
by Sugar Cain
Why do ya'll feel the need to change your meta?
All of this, and I haven't touched on what originally drew our vote. Nor will I for now.
And you never will 'cause you have nothing. On one hand this could be some bullshit reaction test. On the other hand (and what its looking like to me) is you're scum and by saying "I hope people are seeing what we are seeing" and expect another player to claim what they "see" and you'll latch onto it.
Other than being flat out wrong about our alignment, this is also extremely anti-town for a few reasons. 1.) No townie in their right mind is going to blindly sheep you. I see no reason for a supposed town (with a pre-made case) to not voice their opinion and attempt to convince the town that we should be the days lynch. And the longer you withhold said "reasoning", you hold the game hostage. Which transitions nicely to my second point. 2.) We have 6 days left. The longer you withhold said reasoning the less time that the town has to discuss the case on us and possibly/hopefully on someone else. There's also the fact that early game no lynchs are a bad idea so with holding reasoning and not allowing town to discuss...the closer to dl town will say "fuck it" and lynch willy nilly.
there's also the fact to you seem to be tunneling which is never a good thing.
Posted: Tue May 14, 2013 10:51 pm
by Sugar Cain
I thought Ineffective placed that vote
and while your changing the bigger parts of your meta, there's the smaller, finer parts that's harder to change and the parts that I'm picking up on.
I'm polygamist Ffery was more paranoid of people around her much like her most recent post. While your posting amount significantly decreased (something I'm thankful for) Post 112 has that confident tone when you spoke to Orci in polygamist and post 91 has a similar ring to that "interesting" reaction test you did when Orci freaked out on you.
So yeah, Meta read.
I spent less then a minute writing up that "pre-meditated and thoughtful" post soo...
~Sugar
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 3:37 am
by thenewearth
Bah... I didn't get a chance to post yesterday because of some "Technical difficulties"
I do hate TIP's vote on me for that shit reason
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:12 am
by DoctorPepper
I dont think its impossible for scum to attack you SC, I do think its weird that you think they are scum for just voting you
Posted: Wed May 15, 2013 5:20 am
by Sugar Cain
In post 148, DoctorPepper wrote:I dont think its impossible for scum to attack you SC, I do think its weird that you think they are scum for just voting you
and yet that's not it at all.