Mafiascum.net

Or at least TIP is and you're agreeing.

In post 118, Fegelein wrote:

In post 117, Wisdom wrote:

In post 115, TheIrishPope wrote:What is? Explain this please.

Defending can be done by town. AtE can be done by town. Using flawed logic can be done by town.

Except the latter is almost always anti-town.

In post 120, Fegelein wrote:Nice job trying to force this convo into WIFOM.

why do you see this as wifom?

You're misrepping/missing Post 119.

well I don't understand what you are saying tbh

or why it is wifom

In post 122, TheIrishPope wrote:Town AtE: "I'm so fucking pissed at these people misrepping me. I will be genuinely angry and shout at everyone."
Scum AtE: "I'm so fucking pissed at these people misrepping me. I will feign ignorance and try to be likeable."

The thing is, scum is more discreet and subtle, and tries to get on people's good side. Town knows he is right, but because nobody believes him, he just rages.

not quite, but this can be a good start. I can engage on this with you elsewhere.


Fege, Anti-town=Scum?

~Mara

Pedit: agree with Mollie there

*cough* Scum *cough*

In post 119, Wisdom wrote:If done on purpose, yeah. Is that the case?

That's what I called WIFOM.

Also, Anti Town /=/ scum, but in science's case, it also came across as buddying. 2 wrongs don't make a right. It's an early scum read, I don't have much to go off apart from a bunch of null posts anyway.

Why are some people so concerned about me getting NS as a scumread?

What flawed logic am I using, pray tell. I don't care if she's ONE THIRD of the hydra. They still work well together. They still (as far as I've seen) are good at reading each other (this is in the games I've looked over they've both played in). So, what about that argument is flawed? I don't care how many people you have in a hydra. If you have a person who can read JUST ONE part of said hydra, and can tell if they are scum/town, and then WORK WELL with that person (assuming both are town), that's a pretty good team. Now what exactly is the flaw in my logic here?

Also Feg, you're like the third person to tell me that Old news.

P-edit: I also buddy like a m'fer if I find someone to be townsided. Just saying.

How is that quote WIFOM? You said that using flawed logic is anti-town, which implied that it was used on purpose. Which was what I asked you to specify.

That post was so contrived it wasn't even funny. And I can dismantle your argument with a single sentence: That's not always the case.

Your pedit is a desperate attempt to say "I do this as Town"

You are now scummier than Bert.

UNVOTE: Bert
VOTE: Notscience

@Wisdom: How do I know Notscience is doing it on purpose 100%? It comes across as such yes, but I don't know for certain that he's doing it on purpose.

notscience, chill. You seem too overjoyed to be Town.
Well, I have pinned down 3/4 of the scumteam. The question is: Who is the final scum?

In post 134, Fegelein wrote:That post was so contrived it wasn't even funny. And I can dismantle your argument with a single sentence: That's not always the case.

Your pedit is a desperate attempt to say "I do this as Town"

You are now scummier than Bert.

UNVOTE: Bert
VOTE: Notscience

@Wisdom: How do I know Notscience is doing it on purpose 100%? It comes across as such yes, but I don't know for certain that he's doing it on purpose.

Okay, so it's not ALWAYS the case. Is anything ALWAYS the case? Nope. Everything's a gamble, and that's one I'm taking.

And if you're Town, it's a bad way of playing.

In post 110, TheIrishPope wrote:I am no alt. Why do you ask?

I don't remember you in any newbie games.

In post 112, Kerberos wrote:Nacho, yes Framed

Explain.

Still wanna shoot Wisdom.

Nacho, TIP lost a Newbie and he was in Open 494.

Also, what's your case against Wisdom?

Don't shoot Wisdom when there are other people who are obviously scummier.

In post 134, Fegelein wrote:@Wisdom: How do I know Notscience is doing it on purpose 100%? It comes across as such yes, but I don't know for certain that he's doing it on purpose.

Which is exactly why TIP calling him scum for that reason was bad, which was what I stated and you disagreed with me.

In post 140, TheIrishPope wrote:Don't shoot Wisdom when there are other people who are obviously scummier.

Like you? Besides, Wisdom is a code word for bork

And bork is a code word for notscience

I'll let you all guess what notscience is a code for

In post 141, Wisdom wrote:

In post 134, Fegelein wrote:@Wisdom: How do I know Notscience is doing it on purpose 100%? It comes across as such yes, but I don't know for certain that he's doing it on purpose.

Which is exactly why TIP calling him scum for that reason was bad, which was what I stated and you disagreed with me.

Except I never said no.

In post 140, TheIrishPope wrote:Don't shoot Wisdom when there are other people who are obviously scummier.

what if he's scum

In post 142, Oil Tycoons wrote:Like you? Besides, Wisdom is a code word for bork

And bork is a code word for notscience

I'll let you all guess what notscience is a code for

STOP IT

In post 145, Oil Tycoons wrote:

In post 142, Oil Tycoons wrote:Like you? Besides, Wisdom is a code word for bork

And bork is a code word for notscience

I'll let you all guess what notscience is a code for

STOP IT

BITCH I HAVE A GUN

I think notscience is town as shit right now for #132 and I don't think Fegelein has adequately explained why he thinks it's scummy.

Wisdom is null to me. I'm not starting this off like I started off Micro 151 cause this play reeks of exactly what he was doing there and he was town. I'm waiting for analysis from these questions he's asking.

What am I code for.-.

In post 148, notscience wrote:What am I code for.-.

Oil Tycoons