Mafiascum.net

No one cares about ur scumtells. I have my own.

But I have proof that yours is wrong I don't know what more I can give you

Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

In post 127, BBmolla wrote:Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

of course you can... 99.9% of so called scumtells are probably just that...

In post 123, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 103, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 100, BBmolla wrote:

In post 96, PeaceBringer wrote:

In post 95, BBmolla wrote:

FoS Peacebringer

so that he'll call it OMGUS when it's not.

huh?

I read your first post and my scumdar was pinged. Then you voted me. So I knew I'd have to address the incoming OMGUS call that I always get when I vote a scumread who is voting me.

It's really not that hard, vote someone HoH, have everyone indicate who they think is scum, put that guy on the lynch. Easy peasy. No need for 4 pages of theory discussion.

I entirely forgot about the FOS... it was basically a slap... lol you may or may not get used to me.

tell me where the sorry is, it was an explanation... any perception of "sorry" is purely a product of your own mind... you can add in, "and I enjoyed the slap, did you like it. However it was so meaningless and did not last that I forgot about it."

In post 127, BBmolla wrote:Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

Every action in a mafia game is about context--the context makes the tell.

So overreacting in and of itself is not scummy. The way you responded it came off as scum snapping because someone threw a suspicion there way.

@peacebringer: "I entirely forgot..." reads as an apology. That's all I mean.

In post 130, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 127, BBmolla wrote:Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

Every action in a mafia game is about context--the context makes the tell.

So overreacting in and of itself is not scummy. The way you responded it came off as scum snapping because someone threw a suspicion there way.

@peacebringer: "I entirely forgot..." reads as an apology. That's all I mean.

perceptual issue there... your brain filling things in that were not there...

In post 130, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 127, BBmolla wrote:Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

Every action in a mafia game is about context--the context makes the tell.

So overreacting in and of itself is not scummy. The way you responded it came off as scum snapping because someone threw a suspicion there way.

@peacebringer: "I entirely forgot..." reads as an apology. That's all I mean.

So you're saying meta is irrelevent?

Okay dood lol

In post 132, BBmolla wrote:

In post 130, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 127, BBmolla wrote:Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

Every action in a mafia game is about context--the context makes the tell.

So overreacting in and of itself is not scummy. The way you responded it came off as scum snapping because someone threw a suspicion there way.

@peacebringer: "I entirely forgot..." reads as an apology. That's all I mean.

So you're saying

meta is irrelevent

?

Okay dood lol

it largely is, imo

In post 132, BBmolla wrote:

In post 130, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 127, BBmolla wrote:Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

Every action in a mafia game is about context--the context makes the tell.

So overreacting in and of itself is not scummy. The way you responded it came off as scum snapping because someone threw a suspicion there way.

@peacebringer: "I entirely forgot..." reads as an apology. That's all I mean.

So you're saying meta is irrelevent?

Okay dood lol

I hate meta with a passion, but I don't think its irrelevant. Where did I say meta was irrelevant?

where is rule 5C-
sigh on the probable requiring unvote, name, vote, name...

If I were nominated HoH right now, I would probably put up Titus and Bulbazak.

I like Minions and BBmolla. Leaning "ok" on Peace and JakeRD.

I think there are at least 4 people who haven't even posted yet (KBW, Gnomeo, Rach, and Tammy). Most of the discussion is rather boring and still talking about meta, setup spec and direction, and theory. I haven't really seen any reason to waver from why I didn't like Bulba in the first place, and Titus really seems like he's trying to be active but being very scummy about it.

In post 135, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 132, BBmolla wrote:

In post 130, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 127, BBmolla wrote:Can I make it a scumtell that when you use shitty scumtells you're scum?

Every action in a mafia game is about context--the context makes the tell.

So overreacting in and of itself is not scummy. The way you responded it came off as scum snapping because someone threw a suspicion there way.

@peacebringer: "I entirely forgot..." reads as an apology. That's all I mean.

So you're saying meta is irrelevent?

Okay dood lol

I hate meta with a passion, but I don't think its irrelevant. Where did I say meta was irrelevant?

When you said it's a "game by game basis" or whatever, you can literally say that for any sort of meta.

Like Toasty you're calling me scum for shit I don't do as scum what do you want me to say? I'm not gonna sit back and take that, that's bullshit.

Crap. I forgot to bookmark this. I'll catch up now.

VOTE: Toogeloo

Is probably town. I have no problem putting up his suspects for nomination.

I will also



Who I would vote for at this point.

Maybe if everyone who wants to be HOH could announce his nominees and we just vote based on that?

This will give us some links based on the flips we'll get.

BB is town and there is one scum in {Titus, Toasty}

I don't want to be HOH but if I were those would be my nominees

In post 138, BBmolla wrote: When you said it's a "game by game basis" or whatever, you can literally say that for any sort of meta.

I don't think i've said anything about "game by game basis." I said context matters, which I think everyone will agree is true.

In post 139, BBmolla wrote:Like Toasty you're calling me scum for shit I don't do as scum what do you want me to say? I'm not gonna sit back and take that, that's bullshit.

I called you scum because you snapped at a valid observation. Obviously it hit a sore spot.

If you know your meta you can manipulate it. And if meta is as important as you seem to think (it isn't), then why not bring my meta into it?

I forgot to add this gif to my last post

Gnome is in this game? Wow.

In post 146, Keybladewielder wrote:Gnome is in this game? Wow.

Vote: Titus

Why on earth do you want Titus to have HOH?

Oh, my nominees...

Gnomeo and Toast.

Idk, I think Titus us respectable. I haven't even read the game yet, I literally just got here.

In post 144, ToastyToast wrote:

In post 138, BBmolla wrote: When you said it's a "game by game basis" or whatever, you can literally say that for any sort of meta.

I don't think i've said anything about "game by game basis." I said context matters, which I think everyone will agree is true.

In post 139, BBmolla wrote:Like Toasty you're calling me scum for shit I don't do as scum what do you want me to say? I'm not gonna sit back and take that, that's bullshit.

I called you scum because you snapped at a valid observation. Obviously it hit a sore spot.

If you know your meta you can manipulate it. And if meta is as important as you seem to think (it isn't), then why not bring my meta into it?

Context = Game Context = Meta

I snapped because it was an observation with intentions of having other people come to the conclusion, which is scummy. Instead of coming to the conclusion themselves and conclusively starting my wagon, they instead fished to see if anyone would take the observation, come to the conclusion I'm scum, and then sheep them.

Because I can foresee a "My meta is irrelevent because bla bla" after you saying, yknow, that meta is irrelevent.

Like, you're wrong Toasty, it's pretty shitty and looks bad that you haven't realized it by now.