Mafiascum.net

In post 14, TheIrishPope wrote:It was a joke gawd
Also
VOTE: Lastsurvivor

This looked town as fuck, considering he was in the process of getting heat for making another one of his jokes.

In post 24, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:VOTE: TheIrishPope

Why vote the innocent child?

You're always so serious early game. Live a little, kid.

In post 37, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:TiP was pretty clearly looking for stupid scum.

You might be giving him too much credit.

In post 42, TheIrishPope wrote:Mmmmm no not really. People who've talked about how me voting ls was a reaction test are thinking like Townies, but hey scum think like town.
Is there a serial killer in this setup?

What the fuck does this mean?

In post 46, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Why wouldn't scum vote for the IC if the reaction to his vote is to call it a towntell?

I don't think TiP's planning goes that far, either. If he made that vote as scum, it is because he thinks people will think it's too dumb to be scum.

In post 58, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:What frustration F-16? How do my 3 or 4 posts give you a town read on me already?

I liked this response to a townread.

In post 64, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:I am not buddying, I am saying that I have a townread on you. Would you rather I OMGUS a townread? My initial townread was not a "reaction test" and I never said it was. I had a weak townread and I explained why.

Now you know how I feel, F-16.

F-16 seems town, ETL seems town, TiP seems town.

To me, pitoli's ISO doesn't scream null. It screams... counterwagon.

Hoo boy.

Well Bulb I feel we're talking past each other a bit. TIP's vote on the IC was one that neither looked serious to me nor drastically changed my perception of the gamestate, hence I entered the game like I normally would (as Sangres said, going "wheeeeeeeee!").

So to talk about RVS as one subject and wagons as another like they are mutually exclusive topics of discussion is just silly. I was not trying to shift attention, I was trying to explain myself - at this point you're either deliberately misleading, or too far up your own ass to consider my explanation.

VOTE: Sangres

Not exceptionally scummy but that vote's timing kind of was.

At this point I welcome any daycop (or night cop) to have their way with me

In post 121, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:Bulb, you have to admit TIP's ISO is bullshit.

He's vastly improved from the one game I played with him, honestly.

Also ETL is probably the second towniest person here. Bulb my gut is saying town, but I honestly couldn't tell you why.

The rest of ya are nothing.

In post 129, pitoli wrote:VOTE: Sangres

Not exceptionally scummy but that vote's timing kind of was.

Why?

In post 131, Lastsurvivor wrote:The rest of ya are nothing.

:'(

Pitoli, have you played with either head of Sangres before? Have you read any of their games? If so, can you link them to me?

wtf I was at L-1
How does bulbazak know my meta?
What game have i played with last survivor?
Pitoli appeared when Sangres voted him... And promptly omgus'd
VOTE: pitoli

Never mind, I see them on your wiki.

Also, UNVOTE: on TIP.

TIP, I am actually leaning towards Pitoli's OMGUS being townish but that would depend on how aware Pitoli is regarding Nacho's tendency to townread his attackers. A look through Pitoli-Nacho games should sort that out.

Pitoli and airplane scum team?

Nacho, what do you think of Pitoli's OMGUS? Also, I don't understand your reason for voting her. Counterwagon to who?

In post 136, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:TIP, I am actually leaning towards Pitoli's OMGUS being townish but that would depend on how aware Pitoli is regarding Nacho's tendency to townread his attackers.

She's not. The awesome thing about my meta to townread my attackers is mostly that I don't automatically townread my attackers; it's based on whether I read the attack as genuine or not.

In post 138, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Nacho, what do you think of Pitoli's OMGUS? Also, I don't understand your reason for voting her. Counterwagon to who?

TiP.
I don't understand Pitoli's OMGUS, which is the start to a better read on her.

In post 134, F-16_Fighting_Falcon wrote:Pitoli, have you played with either head of Sangres before? Have you read any of their games? If so, can you link them to me?

ive played one game with nacho and a couple with ffery, but only where they were town.

Im not one to metahunt but i can look for links if yo really want them? when I've sobered lol

that's L-1 right?

not claiming till someone shows hammer intent

In post 135, TheIrishPope wrote: Pitoli appeared when Sangres voted him... And promptly omgus'd

that's not quite fair tip. I had just come home from work when i madethat vote

In post 143, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:VOTE: F-16

And there was me thinking we could consolidate townreads and actually work together...

In post 140, pitoli wrote:Im not one to metahunt but i can look for links if yo really want them? when I've sobered lol

Why was our timing in voting you weird?
I prefer you answer when not-sober because those people are more fun to hang around.

idk, just, third vote on a wagon? Im always watching if that shit looks like an opportunity to cement momentum on a mislynch

Nacho it just didnt feel like you even gave it that much thought

yknow what's really fun, tryin and failjng to type this on my phone

The problem is, F-16, you have too many town reads. You are agreeable. I am looking at everyone and I keep coming back to you.

I find Pitoli's posts very genuine and can't see scum motivation behind them.

In post 147, EspeciallyTheLies wrote:The problem is, F-16, you have too many town reads. You are

too

agreeable. I am looking at everyone and I keep coming back to you.

That's just the way I roll. I hunt for town more than scum. I agree with my townreads and try my best to work with them. I even try to work with scumreads to see if they can convince me otherwise. My best method of finding scum is to have enough solid townreads that I POE them.