Posted: Sun Dec 01, 2013 1:13 pm
Hey, thanks for answering a question I addressed to someone else.In post 121, pirate mollie wrote:I understood that it was a relative tell that he was talking about.
what is funny is I don't really think that nacho was being defensive, I was mostly trolling him and pushing his buttons and while I get why arc and mebbe even mala followed my push cos they he and I are pretty good friends and sometimes nacho can be a blank slate that is best observed through other people's eyes when all you see is an empty canvas but i find your push to be weird.
Huh.In post 127, Grimgroove wrote:VOTE: Malakittens
I also think one of mollie/Arcangel is scum, but not both.
your welcome since I answered after the person who you addressed to answered!In post 126, Whiskers wrote:Hey, thanks for answering a question I addressed to someone else.
okay. so you think he was being defensive yet faking defensiveness.I don't think he was being defensive either. My quote that made me think he was trying to play to that "relative tell" was "NO NO NO NO NO."
That's not a real defence. It's not real defensiveness. But is it "screaming his little head off"?
So, misrepping, too.
mebbe I will like you too when you start to make sense it seems like you are straddling some different things and idgiI like you alot.
sorryIn post 129, helium-3 wrote:your welcome since I answered after the person who you addressed to answered!In post 126, Whiskers wrote:Hey, thanks for answering a question I addressed to someone else.
okay. so you think he was being defensive yet faking defensiveness.I don't think he was being defensive either. My quote that made me think he was trying to play to that "relative tell" was "NO NO NO NO NO."
That's not a real defence. It's not real defensiveness. But is it "screaming his little head off"?
So, misrepping, too.
tbh I am not even sure what we are talking about even more
mebbe I will like you too when you start to make sense it seems like you are straddling some different things and idgiI like you alot.
This is what read defensive to me. You probably won't agree, but it's fine we can agree to disagree.In post 47, Nachomamma8 wrote:I'm not the one who needs to give excuses. You need to start giving me excuses for jumping off scum-Wisdom's wagon.In post 40, ArcAngel9 wrote:now what you excuse you got.. you cheater.. i will have my revenge on you..In post 35, Nachomamma8 wrote:NO NO NO NO NOIn post 30, ArcAngel9 wrote:lot of known faces...
hey mattp, long time..
aww...my dear mollie is here I also think Nacho is scum, he cheated me on the other game. lets lynch him first.Wisdom can wait.
VOTE: Nacho
Because we were the two people who started the initial push on you.In post 42, Wisdom wrote:Obviously. Why would whiskers be your buddy in that fantasy you're describing instead of someone else who voted me?
Why do you ask?
I wasn't being defensive; I was making fun of you.In post 44, pirate mollie wrote:I never said I thought you were scum I voted you cos I thought it would be funny and I wanted to see what you would do
why so defensive
Oh, now I'm interested! What was this theoryIn post 131, Malakittens wrote:My theory about MattP has totally been proven wrong so scratch any type of read I may or may not have had on him.
Thought you could only be a hammer rather than using your vote normally which I thought was more townish than a scum role. Instead you voted normally which disapproved that theory all together.In post 132, MattP wrote:Oh, now I'm interested! What was this theoryIn post 131, Malakittens wrote:My theory about MattP has totally been proven wrong so scratch any type of read I may or may not have had on him.
Why?In post 127, Grimgroove wrote:I also think one of mollie/Arcangel is scum, but not both.
I'll bite, why?
Because he was taking to Wisdom, yes, yes, yesIn post 120, Whiskers wrote:Why do you think this is a Wisdom-specific meta that Nacho is using? Have you played with Wisdom before? Do you agree that, him as town, would go all muppet-armed over being Random-Vote-Wagonned early Day 1? Do you agree with Nacho's meta of him?
Here we go again.In post 139, Wisdom wrote:Because you're scum
Can we not answer for him?In post 142, Desperado wrote:Mala, why did you have to ask Wisdom why he's voting you? Was #124 unclear?
Hey Mala. You said the same thing the last time I caught you.In post 144, Malakittens wrote:He does this litteraly every single game I'm in with him. He'll call me scum; tunnel the living fuck out of me. If I'm town I either get frustrated to the point I want to replace out or not play with him for a while or b) ignore him and hope he goes away. If I'm scum he frustrates me to the point I just don't bother responding to him and just NK him that night.
He can't and won't always be right in every single game. He needs to learn this.
Lol. No I didn't. I answered you, but I was on my phone and couldn't quote because I was running to work. I was tryin to point you to one of his last ISO posts and hoping I didn't have to go take your hand and show you were it was.In post 143, Wisdom wrote:You sheeped the 'nacho is defensive' belief because that's what it seemed the cool kids were doing. When I asked you why you believe that, you basically answered "ask them, I don't know" and yet then you tried, foolishly, to provide an original opinion on why he was defensive in hopes of not looking scummy. But it sucks because nacho wasn't anything close to defensive.
Even your "I didn't ask grimgroove because that" thingy is you covering the case someone would point that out. You overly care not to appear scummy.
There is a reason why you WERE on a personal black list of mine. Which is a reason why I made Evil Regals because I was sick of playing with the same players over and over again and being tunneled in general. Mastin was one of them, you were a second one of them.