Mafiascum.net

With all the love in the world for you guys, farside and anatole, can you both check the syntax of your posts before posting them because I've spent way too much time trying to parse through them and we're only on page 5

↑ Ki-Gi wrote:

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:Oh god 5 pages srs

Five pages is nothing, are you serious?

It's not nothing when you were only AFK for ~12 hours and the vast majority of that time was in the middle of the night and you're hungover with a headache that could split the skies.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:So uh I skimmed it all like super fast and zzzzzzz

Also I thought this was Top Gun Mafia when I signed up GODDAMMIT MONGOOOOOOOOOSE

Also I'm gonna do this

VOTE: Anatole

You better check yourself before you Reck yourself.

Just for that:

PEDIT GODDAMMIT MATTP YOU BEAT ME TO MY BIG SHOCKING SWERVE VOTE F U BRO

↑ MattP wrote:With all the love in the world for you guys, farside and anatole, can you both check the syntax of your posts before posting them because I've spent way too much time trying to parse through them and we're only on page 5

I feel there will be this ignore far when she makes a case moment. Am I right?

@ Anatole: what is your view on ki since he expanded? Last time I asked you your views on the last two pages of the game I got a non awnser.

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:a) I know people who say bruh

b) farside, that's why I'm asking questions - to flesh out and contextualize the game so far

I'm not sure on Ki-Gi yet.

↑ farside22 wrote:I feel there will be this ignore far when she makes a case moment. Am I right?

I was going to most likely not to your case because I currently feel that anatole and you are both town and that directing attention to this discussion is counterproductive, but I was going to read it and if I did believe there was merit in the case I would do whatever made sense within the context of my position at the time, which would fall within these options {push anatole, shut up and let you talk, express agreement with the case}

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ mykonian wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Well technically it is self-evident that anything someone does is a thing to do because it was an action performed.

Ok, but I think this is especially appropriate sass on my part given that you're asking me about the second post of a game

I'm decidedly losing you here. Both of you. No clue where you are going with this.

What do you want from posting this and why exactly?

Any kind of response is a good response.

They are fancy sentences that say absolutely nothing. I do not understand why either of you is making them. They are no part of anything social, nor do they do anything to advance the game.

Would be very nice if you did have a clue where that was going.

↑ mykonian wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ mykonian wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Well technically it is self-evident that anything someone does is a thing to do because it was an action performed.

Ok, but I think this is especially appropriate sass on my part given that you're asking me about the second post of a game

I'm decidedly losing you here. Both of you. No clue where you are going with this.

What do you want from posting this and why exactly?

Any kind of response is a good response.

They are fancy sentences that say absolutely nothing. I do not understand why either of you is making them. They are no part of anything social, nor do they do anything to advance the game.

Would be very nice if you did have a clue where that was going.

I was asking Matt about an RVS post, he responded sassily, I responded sassily, he sassed the sass.

↑ mykonian wrote:Any kind of response is a good response.

They are fancy sentences that say absolutely nothing. I do not understand why either of you is making them. They are no part of anything social, nor do they do anything to advance the game.

Would be very nice if you did have a clue where that was going.

Are you actively scumhunting when you ask or are you exclusively just confused about what we were saying?

↑ xRECKONERx wrote:PEDIT GODDAMMIT MATTP YOU BEAT ME TO MY BIG SHOCKING SWERVE VOTE F U BRO

hardly

Me and MattP have the sophisticated rapport of a third season Gilmore Girls episode and you simply cannot keep up, myko.

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ mykonian wrote:Any kind of response is a good response.

They are fancy sentences that say absolutely nothing. I do not understand why either of you is making them. They are no part of anything social, nor do they do anything to advance the game.

Would be very nice if you did have a clue where that was going.

Are you actively scumhunting when you ask or are you exclusively just confused about what we were saying?

...

How is this a question. Apart from the posts surrounding my votes, does it even look like I'm actively scumhunting? After 3 reads I did get anatole's sentence, fine. Then realized I had no clue he made it because it actually said nothing. Nor why you answer it in an equally roundabout way.

You make the post. You obviously have a reason. I get the words, I don't get the reason why the submit button was hit.

↑ mykonian wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ mykonian wrote:Any kind of response is a good response.

They are fancy sentences that say absolutely nothing. I do not understand why either of you is making them. They are no part of anything social, nor do they do anything to advance the game.

Would be very nice if you did have a clue where that was going.

Are you actively scumhunting when you ask or are you exclusively just confused about what we were saying?

...

How is this a question. Apart from the posts surrounding my votes, does it even look like I'm actively scumhunting?

This actually doesn't explicitly answer my question!

I don't think any answer you would give to my questioning of those posts would lead to a direct choice between scum or town. As such, it's hard to put it down as scumhunting, and more a broader investigation into the personae in question.


okay?

also that almost makes me feel like a lawyer. Lets not do that again.

This is just not the first time I've raised an eyebrow at what you've chosen to scumhunt, or respond to, or be inquisitive about, or whatever you would call it. And I barely see any value in you gaining an understanding of the meaning of those two posts so much later in the game, and I've yet to find any of your choices natural in this game.

I was clearly receiving pressure from Anatole about my first vote of the game, and he mocked my response to his pressure so I reexplained myself, albeit with another mocking tone, and then he did the same thing again and then so did I and we had a mutual understanding while also being asses about it.

I think I missed out on the mutual understanding part.

I'm also not an illogical person at all. Wish people could see.

↑ mykonian wrote:I think I missed out on the mutual understanding part.

I'm also not an illogical person at all. Wish people could see.

What's your read on farside?

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Do you think because it was your second post of the game you should be immune to questioning about it?

Of course not, but I do think me saying "Oh boy, no RVS!" and voting and then never returning to that subject paints a pretty legit picture of my intentions with that post to just "do something"

To this transition in conversation from Anatole:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Ki-Gi, do you think it's likely that scum would drop a second-vote-on-wagon vote without explanation like that?

Implied to me that he understood my point and was moving onto focusing on Ki-Gi.

"I'm also not an illogical person at all." -no logical person ever

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ MattP wrote:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Do you think because it was your second post of the game you should be immune to questioning about it?

Of course not, but I do think me saying "Oh boy, no RVS!" and voting and then never returning to that subject paints a pretty legit picture of my intentions with that post to just "do something"

To this transition in conversation from Anatole:

↑ Anatole Kuragin wrote:Ki-Gi, do you think it's likely that scum would drop a second-vote-on-wagon vote without explanation like that?

Implied to me that he understood my point and was moving onto focusing on Ki-Gi.

I'm glad somebody understood that.

First up, she's really farside. Seen this before, I've been a couple of times in your position and I'm a little bit too stubborn as well.

I think farside and I had 3 of such games. (both mixed ones and once we were both town) I think in such arguments I have a vague idea what farsides scum meta is and this isn't yet there. She's quite aware of the way these games go and as scum she uses it, but that does feel different. If I had to call it now this is farside town.

EDIT: depends on your age, Ki-Gi.

↑ mykonian wrote:First up, she's really farside. Seen this before, I've been a couple of times in your position and I'm a little bit too stubborn as well.

I think farside and I had 3 of such games. (both mixed ones and once we were both town) I think in such arguments I have a vague idea what farsides scum meta is and this isn't yet there. She's quite aware of the way these games go and as scum she uses it, but that does feel different. If I had to call it now this is farside town.

EDIT: depends on your age, Ki-Gi.

So what reads do you have? Do you still think Ki-Gi is scum?

Yes. But seen the responses I suspect this isn't really a productive way of using my vote, which is a pity. I'm waiting for a next place to put it down, so I don't really have interesting reads at the moment. Game is a bit meh apart from the flubbernugget wagon, but that'll take time to give something to talk about.