Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:11 pm
and what if i don't? 
Page 6 of 55
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:28 pm
I'd like you to as well, Metal Sonic
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 5:54 pm
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:21 pm
MS, if you feel that post 80 was so bad. Why are you voting UT?
MattP, you get a sheep for your UT argument.
VOTE: UT
MattP, you get a sheep for your UT argument.
VOTE: UT
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:22 pm
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:22 pm
also lmfao at your wrong game haha
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:28 pm
Just because they cannot lynch someone diesn't mean we cannot scumhunt. Plus I am trying to work with others better.
Posted: Fri Oct 03, 2014 6:39 pm
↑ Metal Sonic wrote:than what was this?
Regardless of what my opinion of LMP was at that moment it has nothing to do with me wanting you to expand on YOUR interpretation of his post(s)
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:49 am
MS should swing for this page alone.
vote: MS
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:54 am
Explain, explain, explain... the question I hate the most. Literally makes you write four times the lines in order to answer the one line question.
Oh well, I'm nice, here goes:
Post #80, although looking large and helpful, contributes nothing of substance to the gamestate. Zero. Zilch. LynchmePls does not generate any insight, any opinions, or any analysis into the gamestate. He's trying to look as if he is contributing by providing reads, and even making a pretty 'helpful' reads list at the end of his post, but fails to provide any reasoning for 5/6 of his reads -> referring to those in the non-null pile. Specifically, TSQ, UT, and the other four scumreads. According to the post, the only player that he has expressed suspicion on is myself. Where did the other three scumreads come from?
And then, LynchmePls provides absolutely no reasoning for any of his reads. He makes blanket statements, for example, "Sonic is scum", without
I mean,
it's hypocritical,
I can literally
Anyway, Guyett, shadowez and SSBF magically appear on LynchmePls's scumreads despite barely being mentioned at any point in post #80? Wasn't I the main superstar of his post? How did Guyett take my number 1 top rank for his scumreads?
In conclusion, LynchmePls's post #80 provides nothing to the game, is only an attempt to look townish by appearing to contribute (which is not the case under closer inspection). He asks too many questions but provides too little answers, a hallmark characteristic of scum. Finally, cases are scummy, and he was begging me for one.
P-edit: you scumbag couldn't you make that loser post AFTER I was done destroying you? like only 1 minute before I was done
Oh well, I'm nice, here goes:
Post #80, although looking large and helpful, contributes nothing of substance to the gamestate. Zero. Zilch. LynchmePls does not generate any insight, any opinions, or any analysis into the gamestate. He's trying to look as if he is contributing by providing reads, and even making a pretty 'helpful' reads list at the end of his post, but fails to provide any reasoning for 5/6 of his reads -> referring to those in the non-null pile. Specifically, TSQ, UT, and the other four scumreads. According to the post, the only player that he has expressed suspicion on is myself. Where did the other three scumreads come from?
And then, LynchmePls provides absolutely no reasoning for any of his reads. He makes blanket statements, for example, "Sonic is scum", without
explaining
why. It's almost as if he made up those reads himself.I mean,
it's hypocritical,
I can literally
Spoiler: detail
Anyway, Guyett, shadowez and SSBF magically appear on LynchmePls's scumreads despite barely being mentioned at any point in post #80? Wasn't I the main superstar of his post? How did Guyett take my number 1 top rank for his scumreads?
In conclusion, LynchmePls's post #80 provides nothing to the game, is only an attempt to look townish by appearing to contribute (which is not the case under closer inspection). He asks too many questions but provides too little answers, a hallmark characteristic of scum. Finally, cases are scummy, and he was begging me for one.
Spoiler: words of wisdom
P-edit: you scumbag couldn't you make that loser post AFTER I was done destroying you? like only 1 minute before I was done
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:55 am
↑ LimMePls wrote:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:yeah lynchmepls really need to get lynched, no objection about that, post 80 was trash
Explainwhat was "trash" about it,why MS should swing for this page alone, in detail.
No one help.
Your turn, sweetie pie~
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:57 am
I guarantee that your wish of "Lynch me pls" will be fulfilled during Coffee Phase.
Cause yeah I'm pretty sure you're scum after my own analysis.
Cause yeah I'm pretty sure you're scum after my own analysis.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 4:58 am
So you'd better poison me, betch
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:05 am
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:06 am
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:07 am
seriously i am confusing your avatar with DGB
are you trolling her in a game really?
are you trolling her in a game really?
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:12 am
↑ Metal Sonic wrote:
↑ LimMePls wrote:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:yeah lynchmepls really need to get lynched, no objection about that, post 80 was trash
Explainwhat was "trash" about it,why MS should swing for this page alone, in detail.
No one help.
Your turn, sweetie pie~
Remember, you are only allowed to use posts from #125 to #133~
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:33 am
Congratulation on the baby LMP! May he or she have a bright future.
Titus and PeregrineV, you can turn your online status on by logging off and logging back in, but make sure not to click the box that hides your online status.
Untrod Tripod, nothing to say in regards to my post on you? Also I noticed your claim where you and Konowa claimed to be neighbors; I'm not inclined to move my vote away from you and I would not be surprised if one of you or Konowa are scums.
MattP, do you still have a scum read on TSQ? If so, I'd like for you to expand upon it considering that you haven't elaborated on it at all.
---
Your next line about figuring out their strategy and using it is completely counter-intuitive to the argument you're making against me. I agree that understanding how scum are playing and deciding who is scum based on that makes complete sense, but somebody saying "this is how they should play" undermines that by them now not playing that way.[/quote]
Titus and PeregrineV, you can turn your online status on by logging off and logging back in, but make sure not to click the box that hides your online status.
Untrod Tripod, nothing to say in regards to my post on you? Also I noticed your claim where you and Konowa claimed to be neighbors; I'm not inclined to move my vote away from you and I would not be surprised if one of you or Konowa are scums.
MattP, do you still have a scum read on TSQ? If so, I'd like for you to expand upon it considering that you haven't elaborated on it at all.
---
I don't see how saying that the morning phase is basically a shortened day phase implies understanding of the day phase at the time it was said, especially when the very next post was you acknowledging shos's post.
Then why did you contradict yourself with two RVS votes and then say this:↑ Metal Sonic wrote:Well, best starting in the game though, none of that RVS garbage
A+ logistics shos!
Seems like you're trying to cover your track of contradicting yourself by saying "lol these votes don't count". Just because we can't lynch now doesn't give you a good excuse to use hypothetical votes for lulz, especially when shos is keeping a hypothetical vote count.
The first point is outdated, the second where you claimed I was still advocating a quick coffee drink at #43 is wrong. By the time I posted #43, I had already retracted my position for a short day because I was mistaken in regards to how long the Morning Phase lasted (I though it was three days maximum, not three days minimum). #43 was posted upon me understanding correctly how the Morning Phase worked rather than my misconception about the morning phase when I made my push to end the Morning Phase. I also don't see how I "fell over myself" when responding to him.↑ LimMePls wrote:Voting for coffee now is BAD. Why do you want a short day?
So you grasp this concept enough that you could immediately express it under pressure from TSQ, but you were still advocating a quick coffee drink. EXPLAIN NOW.
Also notice how he fell over himself to appease TSQ under the slightest of pressure.
I haven't had experience with him, but it sounds like it. I can't really read him at all, thought, hard to distinguish if it's just VI play or a scum tactic of sort.[quote=""In post 118, shaddowez"]Attack? I asked if he thought it was a bad idea (which he hasn't answered, BTW). Never said I thought he was scum based on it, or did anything that would qualify as an "attack"
Your next line about figuring out their strategy and using it is completely counter-intuitive to the argument you're making against me. I agree that understanding how scum are playing and deciding who is scum based on that makes complete sense, but somebody saying "this is how they should play" undermines that by them now not playing that way.[/quote]
I all but spelt out here that I disagreed with saying what scums would consider the optimum strategy to be bad. It's like saying that scums are more likely to active lurk or use WIFOM; it doesn't change the fact that they still are more likely to do it.I answered it because Thestatusquo asked me about it.I still believe that scums will try to use the opportunity to push for a lynch that hurts town the most during the Morning Phase, so I still wouldn't be surprised if they tried to convince town to go forward with a mislynch without a general consensus on who's the most likely to flip scum.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:40 am
yeah your post was adorable and I don't give a fuck about it↑ Super Smash Bros. Fan wrote:Untrod Tripod, nothing to say in regards to my post on you? Also I noticed your claim where you and Konowa claimed to be neighbors; I'm not inclined to move my vote away from you and I would not be surprised if one of you or Konowa are scums.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:44 am
"I think he also misunderstood the rules, but because he didn't meet some arbitrary level on contrition I'm going to say I'm scumreading him because ~reasons~"
great analysis bro A+ #1 you'll be a star in this league in no time
great analysis bro A+ #1 you'll be a star in this league in no time
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:46 am
↑ Metal Sonic wrote:seriously i am confusing your avatar with DGB
are you trolling her in a game really?
it's a Speakeasy thing. I was going to change it back when I realized we were in a game together but then I didn't
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:47 am
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 5:56 am
vote: UT
Sheeping here.
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:23 am
Posted: Sat Oct 04, 2014 6:28 am
Seriously though, UT, are you scum?