Page 6 of 41

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:04 am
by Bookitty
I expected you to say something about it when I wrote it. After Garmr's comment, though, I figured you would not.

Why did you vote Flubbernugget and then unvote in the same post? I'm curious to understand your motivations there, especially since Flubbernugget says he's all fine with it.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:12 am
by VictorDeAngelo
Bookitty wrote:I expected you to say something about it when I wrote it. After Garmr's comment, though, I figured you would not.


I don't what you expect me to say about a naked vote, except perhaps what are you reasons?

Why did you vote Flubbernugget and then unvote in the same post? I'm curious to understand your motivations there, especially since Flubbernugget says he's all fine with it.


If that was on your mind I'm surprised you didn't ask sooner. I voted him for the reasons I said in the post, and unvoted him because I then decided to vote 2birds1stone again for more (on top of all the other stuff I already mentioned).

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:16 am
by Bookitty
I was sort of hoping other people would weigh in because I have a known tendency to tunnel and I am trying to avoid doing that here. It leads to endless 1-vs-1s that just muddy up the thread.

Do you think it likely that 2birds1stone and Flubbernugget are scumpartners, given that Flubbernugget announced he was voting the top suspicion of 2birds1stone?

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:20 am
by VictorDeAngelo
I'm not going to worry about associations this early on Day 1 but I don't see why it would exclude the possibility.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:31 am
by Rumia x Cirno
votecount 1.4
2birds1stone (4): Garmr, Jackel98, Gendaberry, VictorDeAngelo

Garmr (2): Flubbernugget, 2birds1stone
ProHawk (1): Feysal
Bookitty (1): WaffleGhost
massive (1): Primate
Primate (1): ProHawk
Jackel98 (1): massive
Flubbernugget (1): Bookitty

Not voting (1): Salamence20

With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch. Deadline is November 16, 19:15 GMT-7 or in: (expired on 2014-11-16 19:15:00)

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:38 am
by Bookitty
massive wrote:Waffle is pinging my newbie scum radar.


What precisely pinged your scumdar, please?

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:32 am
by massive
Bookitty wrote:
massive wrote:Waffle is pinging my newbie scum radar.


What precisely pinged your scumdar, please?


WaffleGhost wrote:I'm not accusing you of being scum, yet. Just stating my opinion as far as play. I'm just a dumb newbie though :P

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:41 am
by Flubbernugget
Boot I already said 93 wasn't scummy what kinda response do you want

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:49 am
by Bookitty
Flubbernugget wrote:Boot I already said 93 wasn't scummy what kinda response do you want


What do you mean by this?

I am not aware that I was waiting on a response from you.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:53 am
by Flubbernugget
"I expected you to have some sort of response, VA"

read as

I expected you to have some sort of response to VA

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 9:59 am
by WaffleGhost
massive wrote:Waffle is pinging my newbie scum radar.


That's nice dear.

Unvote

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:31 pm
by ProHawk
Apparently people don't understand my cryptic posts, so allow me to state this in plain english:

I was never, nor have I ever made a serious post about random votes, or the random voting sequence/scene/start/whatever.

There I said it. Now who are these lovely folk who keep mis-repping me?

Ahh yes, worst offender:
2birds1stone

Then we have:
Victor and Bookitty

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:35 pm
by Flubbernugget
If my vote on you wasn't rvs what was it? Why do you think it was serious?

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:50 pm
by ProHawk
By a show of hands please,

ProHawk wrote:VOTE: Garmr

Only ever seen scum vote for mods.


Who thinks that this post was for realz?

Feysal's posts (Two by the way, and only one is serious) are garbage and a cop-out from scum hunting I would like to state for the record. Before I delve more into this topic, I would specifically like Garmr to comment on the following...

"Garmr is good at staying alive. He has not only won but survived twice as scum, and has been endgamed several times. That gives me a town read on him. I can't think of a reason why he would have deliberately called attention to himself like this if he were scum."

Although this is a teaser...

("I did not like his initial vote, and in his ten posts he has said and done remarkably little.")

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:52 pm
by ProHawk
Flubber, I already explained this.

A) You said I was full of shit.

Therefore, I am either scum (because scum are full of shit) and you voted for me for that reason.

Or, I am just a "shit" player and you voted me randomly.

The first would be a serious vote. The second would be a random vote. You yourself stated that you were not saying I was a "shit" player.

So instead of speculating, how about you just tell me if your vote was serious or not.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 4:54 pm
by ProHawk
Out of the scuffle between Garmr and the bird killer, I am pretty sure Garmr is town. Bird killer looks exponentially worse which kinda actually makes me not want to lynch him.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:23 pm
by Garmr
ProHawk wrote:By a show of hands please,

ProHawk wrote:VOTE: Garmr

Only ever seen scum vote for mods.


Who thinks that this post was for realz?

Feysal's posts (Two by the way, and only one is serious) are garbage and a cop-out from scum hunting I would like to state for the record. Before I delve more into this topic, I would specifically like Garmr to comment on the following...

"Garmr is good at staying alive. He has not only won but survived twice as scum, and has been endgamed several times. That gives me a town read on him. I can't think of a reason why he would have deliberately called attention to himself like this if he were scum."

Although this is a teaser...

("I did not like his initial vote, and in his ten posts he has said and done remarkably little.")

Well to be honest I felt quite flattered a ego boost. Because I know that's what I'm good at but no one has ever mentioned it before. I don't know if his town or scum but he seemed to hit the nail on the head at least in that area.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 6:45 pm
by ProHawk
Not to burst your bubble or anything, but I actually had a hard time finding games you actually made it to the end of. Maybe you could toss a couple links out for me.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:10 pm
by Garmr
ProHawk wrote:Not to burst your bubble or anything, but I actually had a hard time finding games you actually made it to the end of. Maybe you could toss a couple links out for me.

Recent games town games I completed I have been killed night 1 (threat to scum yahhhh) But every game I finished as scum I survived to the end (not going to include the mod kill and forced replace outs.).

but here's the list not including newbies
-Mini 1501: We’re On A Boat!-
-Mini Normal 1505 N is for normal-(scum game)
-Mini 1500:Narnia- The Lion,the Witch,and the Wardrobe Mafia-
-mini1510 PAUL WALKER MEMORIAL flights of angels sing thee to-
-Micro 235 - NikPick IV ~Game Over~- I'm including this one because I made it to end game of game 1. The mod made a bad choice and reset the game after scum won and said scum have to win three times I was like fudge that.

Not that's if I don't get killed night one
Mini 1499 - State Farm Mafia 2 - Game Over
-white flag open 547-

the only time I ever got lynched as town was
mini 1523 viscon desert kingdom. The irony is I had nailed every single scum yet I still got lynched and no one listened to me. It was also the game that showed me elyse can't think past roles as town.

All the other games I got forced replaced out of because of my ban(none of those I was in a position to get lynched.) except one which i choose to replace out of after throwing a hissy fit which I embarrassed I did.

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:11 pm
by Garmr
*I am embarrassed*

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 7:43 pm
by Rumia x Cirno
Salamence20 has failed to pick up his prod and is being replaced. Searching...

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 8:06 pm
by VictorDeAngelo
WaffleGhost wrote:
massive wrote:Waffle is pinging my newbie scum radar.


That's nice dear.

Unvote


I thought this was a precursor to a bigger post. I'm dissappointed. Do you have any thoughts on the game you want to share with us Waffle?

ProHawk wrote:Apparently people don't understand my cryptic posts, so allow me to state this in plain english:

I was never, nor have I ever made a serious post about random votes, or the random voting sequence/scene/start/whatever.

There I said it. Now who are these lovely folk who keep mis-repping me?

Ahh yes, worst offender:
2birds1stone

Then we have:
Victor and Bookitty


How the fuck is my name on this list?

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 10:58 pm
by Gendaberry
WaffleGhost really seems like scum who doesn't know what they're doing to me. Waffle hasn't really done anything at all so far. It's not putting pressure on anyone or voting anyone, and on top of that I don't like 56

WaffleGhost wrote:I'm not accusing you of being scum, yet. Just stating my opinion as far as play. I'm just a dumb newbie though :P


Its the only post from Waffle with content, and even then he adds the "dumb newbie" comment in what looks to me like they're trying to preemptively defend themselves in case someone found the post scummy. I might be reading too far into it, but it looks like Waffle is trying to avoid suspicion by never accusing anyone, and by pulling the newbie card to try and make themselves look innocent.

VOTE: WaffleGhost

Posted: Wed Nov 05, 2014 11:35 pm
by Gendaberry
Also massive, what do you think of Garmr and 2birds? You seem to have mostly stayed out of it.

Posted: Thu Nov 06, 2014 12:08 am
by Rumia x Cirno
kero