skitzer wrote:FoS: Radagast
DGMavn wrote:FoS: Radagast
perfect628 wrote:FoS: Radagast
skitzer wrote:FoMS: Kerplunk
What's with all the FOSing? There's nothing wrong with voting, especially this early in the game.Holy wrote:FOS: Kerplunk
isnt that sort of implied?Holy wrote:We can't just stopped seeing someone scummy, there's still a possibility he's scum. If you said that vitamin's not too scummy at the moment, maybe I will be more satisfied with your answer though... Heh, now I'm the one that feel confused after saying these thing...perfect628 wrote:well vitamin stopped seeming scummy 2 me a)because it didnt seem like he still wanted the real yet random lynch and b)because it was a semi-random vote to begin with.
I don know, but the case I make seems far-fetched but not th'at strange, I think. Doesn't his unvote of perfect feels strange to you?skitzer wrote:What's wrong with Kerplunk? I can understand why he wanted to remove his vote, but then criticizing Vitamin doesn't make sense to me.
FoMS: Kerplunk
Holy wrote:.
@Vitamin, I need a little bit more clues, for my best bet vote.
Asking? I didn't asking anybody for any clue. From myself, I just trying to regularly posting so I can gather as many clue as possible for myself oR for us to read, that's all.Porochaz wrote:In terms of Holys line, I was interested to see if anyone else thought it was scummy as my last thought was a misinterpretation. I feel my vote on skitzer is good and I am tempted to keep it on him butunvote vote Holythe asking for clues? whats with that?
Oyeah, CKD, for me to get conversation started could be by many ways, not always by placing a vote (pressure vote). What I feel about random phase is more like a place to say hello/joking phase that sometimes (not always) turned to a wide discussion.curiouskarmadog wrote:you didnt have a problem with your random vote, why would you have a problem placing a pressure vote to get conversation started? If you later felt he was not scummy enough, or that he is too close to a lynch for your taste at the moment, you can always unvote..
Not too charmed by this. What is scummy about saying you need more clues?Porochaz wrote:In terms of Holys line, I was interested to see if anyone else thought it was scummy as my last thought was a misinterpretation. I feel my vote on skitzer is good and I am tempted to keep it on him butunvote vote Holythe asking for clues? whats with that?
Holy wrote:Oyeah, CKD, for me to get conversation started could be by many ways, not always by placing a vote (pressure vote). What I feel about random phase is more like a place to say hello/joking phase that sometimes (not always) turned to a wide discussion.curiouskarmadog wrote:you didnt have a problem with your random vote, why would you have a problem placing a pressure vote to get conversation started? If you later felt he was not scummy enough, or that he is too close to a lynch for your taste at the moment, you can always unvote..
Especially this early.., could a vote make someone feels pressured and make that person will immediately take action, I doubt that...
It will be different, if I have a good base/suspicion for my vote, I could be nagging that person till I satisfied..., lol. Thus, will force that voted person to answer me, making the conversation continuous.
Now..now... This is already a discussion/conversation, right...!
Ah, can you understand what I mean? My english kind of screwed...
I just can't get this off my mind:Kerplunk wrote:I don know, but the case I make seems far-fetched but not th'at strange, I think. Doesn't his unvote of perfect feels strange to you?skitzer wrote:What's wrong with Kerplunk? I can understand why he wanted to remove his vote, but then criticizing Vitamin doesn't make sense to me.
FoMS: Kerplunk