In post 123, Ircher wrote:If that happens, remember when I flip town that Shotty and Egg were the two huge activists for the lynch.
Pedit:
1) Maybe fallacious, not scum indicative
2) "One-Size-Does-Not-Fit-All"
3) That's stupid cuz this wagon is crap
4) But why this wagon?
5) I already defended myself more than adequately. Not an argument.
6) Ok, have bullets just for bullets.
Only 1 good argument out of the 6 bullets you provided; try harder.
Pedit: @Titus -- My vote's on Copper right now. I have to explain this to these hard-heads though.
Defending yourself is stupid. It's something I found out a long time ago. Find the
actual scum
focus the fuck on them. That's why when someone accuses me of tunnelling the first thing I ask my suspect is who the hell is actually scum. Talk about that. Which do you think are scum diverting from Copper?
If you caught Ircher scum on page 1 I'll be happy to go next.
Cooper RVSes Ircher.
If Cooper thinks Ircher is scum, why would cooper be ok with being lynched for being correct? If cooper thinks Ircher is town, why is Cooper still voting him?
In post 19, copper223 wrote:@Ircher
Nice, I can already tell you are more sure of yourself compared to when we played the first time.
@dr
Increased likelyhood of getting a read compared to another random, but since Ircher's been playing a lot that's not necessarily true anymore.
And the cooper ircher buddying continues! VOTE: ircher
I'm almost sure of this now.
In post 124, Egg wrote:Titus, which Ircher votes do you think are RVS?
I stopped quoting after awhile. The whole point of RVS is wagoning the first Sob who defends of anyone else. It's a pretty consistent pattern. The rest are tick tack, which is a sign they're all RVS voters.
When I highlight an actual inconsistent thought process, people come out of the woodwork just dismissing out of hand for no reason.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:40 pm
by TehBrawlGuy
In post 123, Ircher wrote:If that happens, remember when I flip town that Shotty and Egg were the two huge activists for the lynch.
1. the fact you keep bringing up how often you've been scum. its a complete fallacy
2. the "pick on ircher day" comment sounds veeeery close to what i've seen scum say before
3. this wagon is the best wagon, and i am a wagoner. love wagons. love em.
4. wagons are there for analysis. and reaction testing. and also lynching scum, but don't forget the other two
5. if you're not scum, that'll show itself before 7 more people vote you, so i'm fine w/this wagon
6. i like lists.
In post 119, Egg wrote:Ircher, I've gone into as much detail as I possibly can.
To be honest, I'd be pretty ok with speedlynching Ircher and Killthestory already...
speedlynching me because i wont answer your dumbass fucking questions that have literally nothing to do with this game and dont help town at all?
wow what great reasoning
Hey, we got a spot on Copper open for ya.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:42 pm
by Killthestory
sure VOTE: copper
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:43 pm
by Ircher
@Zakk
Why do you feel Titus's logic for voting Copper is invalid? It is true he's still voting me despite showing a strong belief I'm town.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:45 pm
by Titus
In post 135, Ircher wrote:@Zakk
Why do you feel Titus's logic for voting Copper is invalid? It is true he's still voting me despite showing a strong belief I'm town.
That's not how KTS plays. He's not a calculator. He reads by emotion.
Because I was talking to you and telling you that your question isn't likely to yield the response you seek.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:54 pm
by Ircher
It was addressed at Zakk but you said KTS. So, obviously, Id be confused about that.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 1:58 pm
by Titus
Oh le derp. I'm just going to sit down over here and apologize for misreading.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:01 pm
by Egg
Ircher, of course I want the focus on you. I think you're scum. That was a pretty lame attack.
Killthestory, it's not the fact that you didn't answer. I asked because I had suspicions. Your answers could have swayed me the other way. You chose not to answer. I kept my suspicions.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:02 pm
by Killthestory
THATS THE STUPIDEST THING IVE EVER HEARD HOW CAN ME TELLING YOU IM TOWN SWAY YOU IN ANY WAY AT ALL
AT ALL
WHAT
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:03 pm
by Ircher
@Egg You have yet to provide a good case why.
What do you have against what Titus shared about Copper?
Pedit: Ikr.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:06 pm
by Egg
Well, if you hadn't realized you didn't directly answer and chose to do so and then showed me past games where you lied your ass off as scum (one of probably many examples) then yeah I'd be swayed.
Preview edit: I disagree. I like my points against you. Titus' Copper case is halfway decent but when she made it, I didn't want to switch because I felt more strongly about you being scum. Now, the fact that my top two scum reads are on the wagon makes me even less likely to switch. For what it's worth, I believe that it's a case Titus could honestly believe in.
In post 135, Ircher wrote:@Zakk
Why do you feel Titus's logic for voting Copper is invalid? It is true he's still voting me despite showing a strong belief I'm town.
tbqh so am i
Like Titus said (a little less politely), stop focusing on your wagon and focus on other things, and so will other people. You're making it really hard to use your wagon as flypaper for scum who come into the thread and vote you without reading anything else.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:08 pm
by Ircher
In post 122, Titus wrote:Ircher, kindly shut the fuck up. The more your case gets talked about, the more credence it appears to have although it's total garbage RVS. You know it. I know it. If you actually did the slightest thing scummy, I'd be all over it. You just haven't.
You realize how Copper has displayed
actual inconsistencies
and people are pushing awkard things you are saying because they don't like math. Get real.
Posted: Thu May 19, 2016 2:10 pm
by zakk
I don't feel like Titus copper case is invalid, mayhaps I should've just said I'm not interested in it right now