Mafiascum.net

Hey

Hey

Hey

Ugh I'm behind again already. From a quick skim I agree with Gamma I didn't like Kawso's interject. Feels rather forced and he draws attention to PR's unesscarily.

Balki seems to be trying really hard and pushing analysis so probably town but it's too early for me to have any real conviction with that opinion, more of a soft lean.

Bellaphant has been very quiet and I didn't really like their vote on GameNBurger felt off. Not sure if it's just the lack of explanation or because I'm skimming the game.

Not sure what to make of Flubber recent posts. Not sure on Tenshii either but I at least like that he like Gamma is addressing Lasso.

So right now I like Gamma, Balki, and Tenshi. And that's all pretty soft.

Im always really bad at reading Hydras but I think my vote is better moved over here.
VOTE: Kawso

Can you give us some thoughts since your joke analysis of a joke means you haven't provided real analysis yet? also less PR talk and potential shade throwing at Balki and others please.

I'm at work right now I know I only hit like half the playerlist but I'll have more around lunch.

In post 116, CommKnight wrote:VOTE: GameNBurger - Because he's scum.

Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?

In post 130, GameNBurger wrote:

In post 116, CommKnight wrote:VOTE: GameNBurger - Because he's scum.

Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?

Why are you concerned about CommKinght blank-voting more than you are about anyone else's blank vote?

In post 131, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 130, GameNBurger wrote:

In post 116, CommKnight wrote:VOTE: GameNBurger - Because he's scum.

Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?

Why are you concerned about CommKinght blank-voting more than you are about anyone else's blank vote?

Because I just woke up and I haven't finished responding to what I've missed

Also since im between classes VOTE: kawso [\vote]

PR calling is a crime punishable by death here

In post 133, GameNBurger wrote:

In post 131, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 130, GameNBurger wrote:

In post 116, CommKnight wrote:VOTE: GameNBurger - Because he's scum.

Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?

Why are you concerned about CommKinght blank-voting more than you are about anyone else's blank vote?

Because I just woke up and I haven't finished responding to what I've missed

This doesn't really add up. What about Sesq's vote?

In post 134, GameNBurger wrote:Also since im between classes VOTE: kawso [\vote]

PR calling is a crime punishable by death here

Actually nah.
VOTE: GameNBurger

VOTE: GameNBurger
policy lynch me pls

In post 125, Flubbernugget wrote:Hey

Hey

Hey

This is library

In post 137, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 134, GameNBurger wrote:Also since im between classes VOTE: kawso [\vote]

PR calling is a crime punishable by death here

Actually nah.
VOTE: GameNBurger

Sesqs vote doesn't bother me because there are pages of Balki faltering all over the place in response to any pressure with direct posts pointing out what about his responses seem scummy. Other than a small comment from someone else that "I'm stretching" there's been no read on me

If we're gonna pressure vote atleast put a bit of your own self at stake

"Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?"
this really doesn't have anything to do with the general consensus on how scummy people are

In post 141, MarioManiac4 wrote:"Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?"
this really doesn't have anything to do with the general consensus on how scummy people are

Be a bit clearer with what you're saying, which also boils down to the problem I had with balki and comm, and now you apparently. I don't think that automatically means scum, I'm just trying to as for some godamn clarity in writing.

I'm apologizing in advance for the massive flooding of posts from my end, I just got to a computer

In post 117, DeltaW wrote:
Thing is, if nobody makes a post like this we don't get anywhere.

In post 118, DeltaW wrote:
Can you two stop this, separate arguments is anti-town, all I see is 2 fuckwits arguing over a point made several pages ago and escalating it so which ever of you is scum can use it as material for your wagon later.

Oh sorry, I thought if nobody started making posts looking at how other users react, that we don't get anywhere.

In post 142, GameNBurger wrote:

In post 141, MarioManiac4 wrote:"Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?"
this really doesn't have anything to do with the general consensus on how scummy people are

Be a bit clearer with what you're saying, which also boils down to the problem I had with balki and comm, and now you apparently. I don't think that automatically means scum, I'm just trying to as for some godamn clarity in writing.

What does the general consensus on how scummy people are have to do with blank votes?

In post 111, Balki B wrote:

In post 106, Gamma Emerald wrote:

In post 105, Balki B wrote:

In post 101, Gamma Emerald wrote:This can die. You don't nonchalantly point out possible PRs like that. Last person to point one out in a game I was in (Alisae) was right and got the Doctor dead.

Are you voting Kawso because you think he's bad town or because you think he's scum? Do you think scum would be so cavalier?

When Alisae pointed out a PR tell, was Alisae town or scum?

Alisae just said "this guy is PR". He was Town, but was acting like hammered scum. For here, I feel Town would actually care about keeping PRs hidden.

Yeah, of course town must be more careful about PRs. But I'm not surprised Alisae was Town. Pretty odd that you use an example of something that bad town did as an example to prove your scum case.

I'm not surprised that Alisae was Town in your anecdote because it seems like the kind of thing that bad town would do as a mistake more frequently than bad scum would do as a mistake. It makes sense that Town is trying to sort PRs from VTs from scum, but you'd think bad scum would be more careful to avoid being explicit about that. I believe the only thing Kawso's PR comment revealed is that he is not being very careful.

UNVOTE: Kawso

>Kawso does something scummy that hurts you directly
>"That something scum would do, no scum would be stupid enought to do that, so he must be town"
>Unvotes Kawso

I'm sorry but the whole "this is scummy, no scum would ever do that" is some serious WIFOM

In post 92, Siblings Pet Doggo wrote:

In post 91, Balki B wrote:

In post 87, GameNBurger wrote:Sorry I thought ethos meant emotion not ethics, is it pathos I'm looking for? I thought that had to do with credibility of the author?

It's all good, we're not Greek, so no need to use their backwards language.

Ethos

is appeal to ethics, and generally includes an attempt to persuade based on the credibility of the speaker.

Pathos

is appeal to emotion, usually pity, and also a lazy buzzword for "scummy" used by poor players of forum mafia.

Bruh, no one even uses this language on MS.
It's a red hairing.

-Ali

What do you mean by this? Genuinely asking here.

In post 125, Flubbernugget wrote:Hey

Hey

Hey

I can follow your one word responses when you're quoting but if you expect us to have any idea what you're saying here Im afraid nobody has a clue, unless its a comedic fat albert impression

In post 145, MarioManiac4 wrote:

In post 142, GameNBurger wrote:

In post 141, MarioManiac4 wrote:"Is not giving reasons for votes the new meta, or would you care to enlighten any of us?"
this really doesn't have anything to do with the general consensus on how scummy people are

Be a bit clearer with what you're saying, which also boils down to the problem I had with balki and comm, and now you apparently. I don't think that automatically means scum, I'm just trying to as for some godamn clarity in writing.

What does the general consensus on how scummy people are have to do with blank votes?

Where did i imply this

A game with people talking gives a lot more advantage to town victories, If we all just stay silent we don't have much to go on

That doesn't mean silence is scummy, silence is incidental, but It helps if everyone would just say what they're thinking given that I hope we're out of RVS. A list full of blank votes doesnt give us much info post lynching. I get trying to get a rise out of someone but atleast put yourself at stake so its not all for nothing.