I agree and disagree. Like I think most players have a tendency to look at things in kinda black and white-this is scummy/not scummy but there's still "scummy" play that is just bad play.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
I agree and disagree. Like I think most players have a tendency to look at things in kinda black and white-this is scummy/not scummy but there's still "scummy" play that is just bad play.
Sure, but you don't gum up the thread with thoughts like that unless you're pointing out that it's town being not-very-towny.
In post 111, Sunlit Diamond wrote:
I'm confused about why you responded to that question. It was clearly directed at Lapsa, about you. Can you explain?
I can't read.
that's not alignment indicative though.
just something to consider when reading him
You say 'strange' is not scumreading, but by lumping Impede and Bory in with Lapsa, whom you have scumread, you're drawing a not so subtle line of comparison between them. The world not being black and white isn't a good answer to inquiry about this; can you go into more detail about WHY that list of people is acting 'strange', and what it means for your reads list over all?
Bipolar • ADHD • Call me Sunny • GTKAS
May your past be the sound of your feet upon the ground - carry on.
I've already explained what makes them all strange. It's not that much to read the last 2 or so pages. And I explained why I scumread Lapsa. All 3 are strange. 1 I scumread hard.
All I see you is saying that you think they're acting strange. What does 'strange' mean, if it doesn't mean a scum read? It looks a lot like a way to fence sit, to me.
Bipolar • ADHD • Call me Sunny • GTKAS
May your past be the sound of your feet upon the ground - carry on.
Just to make it clear. Kokichi, you think that Lapsa is scum and your argument is, that when sameone claimed scum he voted, 2 posts after it, against the claim whisout reasoning?
I think he's scum because of the way he went about it
In post 46, Kokichi Oma wrote:I just wanted to see who would have a weird reaction, and I think I found the person.
Make up your mind. I wasn't the one who suggested a PL on you page 1.
I still don't know what you were hoping to achieve. I can't see any response to that, organic or fabricated, being AI... especially because anyone in their right mind already suspects that you only posted it to stir the pot, so any reactions you get are WIFOM.
This post is a bit weird, cause I wasn't talking about you. But, the way you answered it is weird for someone you are suspicious of.
i sympathize with kokichi here becuase i've been in the same position. noticing things that are strange isn't necessarily some attempt to avoid scumhunting, it can just as easily be town attempting to point out what they're noticing about the gamestate, even if not all of it falls immediately into town/scum.
I misread your statement. "I think I found the person" could very easily have been interpreted as referring to me. Hence the "make up your mind". Also, how is my answer weird? I've since explained myself.
What's your goal here KO? I think that's what everyone is trying to understand. Your line(s) of questioning are distinctly directionless, as was your opening scumclaim. If you really want to investigate Lapsa you would be better off focusing your effort rather than chasing rabbit holes. We have enough time to evaluate potential scum that certain leans can be followed up on as we gain additional content. Fence sitting and contributing to town directionlessness is scummy behavior.
Of all tyrannies,a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive. It would be better to live under robber barons than under omnipotent moral busybodies. The robber baron's cruelty may sometimes sleep but those who torment us for our own good will torment us without end they do so with the approval of their own conscience.
In post 78, Nero Cain wrote:I think this comes from scum alot. Attacking bad or poor play to make themselves look useful but it serves no purpose in scumhunting. I like my vote.
do you not think it could be annoyed town? To me, he doesnt seem very "blendy", he is right up under your nose.
You've reached that age, Listy. 24, 25...Your muscles give up, they wave a little white flag of surrender and without any warning at all, you're suddenly a fat bastard...
think this is often a big problem. town often make mistakes and act "scummy". It's the players that seem really logicaql that are often scum
therre are exceptions obviously blah blah
You've reached that age, Listy. 24, 25...Your muscles give up, they wave a little white flag of surrender and without any warning at all, you're suddenly a fat bastard...