Mafiascum.net

In post 72, ActionDan wrote:I wasn't sure on page 1/2 but page 3 is just too much.

I'm truly sorry that you had to go through the Drealmerz experience of horribly modded games.

VOTE: Nancy

Whatever happens please don't get discouraged

In post 99, ActionDan wrote:

In post 85, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:If you are this sure; then once again; what is there to gain fromthe rush? I’m not expectinh it to translate here; I was just stating a fact.

I honestly don’t care anymore. I don’t wznt to be in yhis gzme znymore. I zm too upst to czre at this point.

There's nothing to gain and yet nothing to lose really from rushing. The stigma is related to people that vote fast / quick hammer without solid reasons for doing so.

If you weren't expecting that fact to carry some weight you wouldn't have brought it up. You are obviously appealing to our sympathies to halt the lynch as best you can.

----

My advice: Don't take lynches personally, or invest too much emotion in them. I mean we all do to an extent but it's best to moderate our expectations of ourselves and the players at large. Just learn from this one.

I’m picking up mixed mesages from this. If you truly think I’m scum; then why the - what I read as fake concern fo my feelings? To me, this isn’t adding up. The only reason you would feel bad for me; is if you either doubt that I’m scum or you are knowingly pushing a mislynch. Because, I can’t understand why you would feel this bad otherwise?

If I was the one who either hammered someone or came close to it, and I was convinced that they were scum; I wouldn’t say this to them. I only ever feel bad, if I think I might possibly be mislynching someone. I never feel bad, if I’m convinced that a player is scum.

In post 124, Papa Zito wrote:

In post 117, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 108, Papa Zito wrote:Unfortunately I happen to fall firmly in the "meta is garbage" school of witchcraft and wizardry. The idea of looking at someone's play on a whole other site tvakes the concept to an absurd new level, which is what I was trying to say earlier. I can explain why but that just becomes a theory argument and who cares really.

I disagree with that. I think if someone says, look at my meta from 5 years ago, than yeah.

Well you're free to disagree ofc but you'll forgive me if I'm not swayed by someone who's played as many games as I've played years.

In post 122, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 37, Papa Zito wrote:VOTE: Nancy ez

No reason? Why not?

Who said I didn't have a reason?

Why don’t you give your reason for voting for me then?

Oh goodness if I had a dollar for every time I've been asked that question I'd own the site.


Let me ask you: Why might a player place a vote on another player without a stated reason?

In post 119, Wisdom wrote:Nancy enough with the selfmeta and theories
I want to see what you think about people's alignments.

Rn, I’m the most sus about Action Dan, I think his professed concern for me doesn’t add up; if he’s beyond convinced I’M scum.

I also don’t like Zito not giving any reason for voting on me; even when I pressed him on it.

VOTE: Action Dan

In post 128, Papa Zito wrote:Oh goodness if I had a dollar for every time I've been asked that question I'd own the site.


Let me ask you: Why might a player place a vote on another player without a stated reason?

But I’ve asked you now twice and you STILL won’t say what that is? Is it a secret or do you not even have one?

I almost always at least try to give a reason - esp. when explicitly asked.

It sounds like you don’t want to answer and the fact that I’ve asked you now twice reads like you really don’t have one.

ugh
Your scumhunting is surface level, guess I should have figured

All due respect ND39 but that was physically painful to watch......I am here to lynch scumz not relive the angst of my high school life

If youd put as much time into this game thinking about others' alignments as you have spamming AtE the game state would be a lot better and people would have actual reads on you.

Honest feedback

In post 121, Eddie Cane wrote:VOTE: Eeveelution

Great vote VOTE: Eeveelution

In post 129, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 119, Wisdom wrote:Nancy enough with the selfmeta and theories
I want to see what you think about people's alignments.

Rn, I’m the most sus about Action Dan, I think his professed concern for me doesn’t add up; if he’s beyond convinced I’M scum.

I also don’t like Zito not giving any reason for voting on me; even when I pressed him on it.

VOTE: Action Dan

Are scum more likely to vote without reasons?
Why/why not?

In post 104, EeveeLution Army wrote:Tbh i really dislike turbos. But sometimes it could benefit town to prevent multiple PRs being outed D1.
Idk their alignment so I'm not gonna choose a side here yet. They just seem overly defensive.

I found scum. Let's see if anyone else was pinged by this too.

VOTE: Eevee

In post 121, Eddie Cane wrote:VOTE: Eeveelution

Good vote. Can you tell me why you voted her? Want to see if our reasons are the same

In post 126, Wisdom wrote:VOTE: eevee

Same question as above

In post 129, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 119, Wisdom wrote:Nancy enough with the selfmeta and theories
I want to see what you think about people's alignments.

Rn, I’m the most sus about Action Dan, I think his professed concern for me doesn’t add up; if he’s beyond convinced I’M scum.

I also don’t like Zito not giving any reason for voting on me; even when I pressed him on it.

VOTE: Action Dan

What do you think of eevee?

In post 132, the worst wrote:All due respect ND39 but that was physically painful to watch......I am here to lynch scumz not relive the angst of my high school life

If youd put as much time into this game thinking about others' alignments as you have spamming AtE the game state would be a lot better and people would have actual reads on you.

Honest feedback

In post 121, Eddie Cane wrote:VOTE: Eeveelution

Great vote VOTE: Eeveelution

Now I guess more people saw what i did, which makes me feel more comfortable

In post 131, Wisdom wrote:ugh
Your scumhunting is surface level, guess I should have figured

Why? You think I’m wrong about that? And why evee?

Unlike a lot of people here; I am far from certain rn; so I went with my best guess.

If so many people are so eager to hammer so quickly on whomever; I’d honestly prefer to vote no lynch, or wait. I don’t want to hammer on anyone until I’m far more certain.

I don’t want a mislynch period.

You asked me a question and I did my best to answer it. I doubt my reads will extend beyond “surface” in under 24 hrs., esp. when I’ve never played with most of the people in this game before.

Nobody is certain about anything. It seemed that way because we wanted to extract reactions from you. Don't take everything at face value.

In post 118, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 116, EeveeLution Army wrote:

In post 113, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 111, EeveeLution Army wrote:They don't particularly tell us if you're town or scum ?_?

I’m town in all of them. Like I said, I have yet to rand scum.

Then how can we know how you play as SCUM? For all we know you did get scum this time.

You’re right, you can’t because I don’t have any scum meta only town but that’s true for everyone in this game.

What? This is completely false

In post 141, EeveeLution Army wrote:

In post 118, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 116, EeveeLution Army wrote:

In post 113, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:

In post 111, EeveeLution Army wrote:They don't particularly tell us if you're town or scum ?_?

I’m town in all of them. Like I said, I have yet to rand scum.

Then how can we know how you play as SCUM? For all we know you did get scum this time.

You’re right, you can’t because I don’t have any scum meta only town but that’s true for everyone in this game.

What? This is completely false

I meant, no one - other than scum, obv. can know anyone else’s alignment.

Obviously yes. But im sure there are people here who have had at least a little scummeta

Just wanted to let ppl know I'm here and I'm waiting on Mom to get here (b/c I forgot the hydra password lol)

In post 140, Wisdom wrote:Nobody is certain about anything. It seemed that way because we wanted to extract reactions from you. Don't take everything at face value.

I have no problem with that.

Eevee everything in your iso is either theorytalk or waffling about nancy

In post 143, EeveeLution Army wrote:Obviously yes. But im sure there are people here who have had at least a little scummeta

I never said there wasn’t. I only said that I don’t and that I don’t know anyone’s allignment but my own.

In post 130, Nancy Drew 39 wrote:But I’ve asked you now twice and you STILL won’t say what that is? Is it a secret or do you not even have one?

I almost always at least try to give a reason - esp. when explicitly asked.

It sounds like you don’t want to answer and the fact that I’ve asked you now twice reads like you really don’t have one.

oh no you avoided my question. I guess that means that just because someone asks a question doesn't mean you're obligated to answer! :3

It does indeed sound like I don't want to answer. That's because I don't want to answer. Not wanting to answer is not the same thing as not having a reason however.

I'll ask again: Can you think of any reason someone might have a reason to vote yet not want to share?


PS who the hell taught you how to use semicolons because good lord go get a refund

In post 132, the worst wrote:All due respect ND39 but that was physically painful to watch......I am here to lynch scumz not relive the angst of my high school life

If youd put as much time into this game thinking about others' alignments as you have spamming AtE the game state would be a lot better and people would have actual reads on you.

Honest feedback

In post 121, Eddie Cane wrote:VOTE: Eeveelution

Great vote VOTE: Eeveelution

Well, sorry for that but I thought the votes last night on me were a joke; so I was shocked to find myself at L-2. j Would you really be this nonchalant if you unexpectedly found yourself at L-2 in a d1 maj vote? I seriously doubt it.

Thanks for the free “advice” but it would be far more helpful to me; to tell me your reasons for voting Evee.