Mafiascum.net

In post 123, Skygazer wrote:"Look at me I'm so town"

I was just as confused when I first saw it.

Oh I can already tell this is my least favorite new buzzword

From the makers of WIFOM, your go to kitchen appliance when you just need to throw away someone's argument based on nothing, IT'S LAMIST!

Tired of players who are just too darned good at making their alignment known? Need a way to discredit would-be town leaders, but can't handle the shit storm that would come from you suggesting that 'maybe...they're TOO town"?

Well with just two quick sprays of LAMIST, you'll eradicate even the most obvious of obvtown, we guarantee it!*

*Warning guarantee is not actually a guarantee your results may vary

In post 110, dramonic wrote:

In post 108, Flubbernugget wrote:I think inferno flails by now if they're scum

...so...
why aren't you voting him?

A very stock answer/quote thrown in an attempt to look townie.
Such a basic thing to ask "then why aren't you voting?"
But it reveals, in fact, that dramonic didn't really read what was said, and went for the appearances instead.
VOTE: Dramonic

In post 78, profii wrote:

In post 73, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: No Lynch

Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?

Why is this scummy to you?

I detect these^^.

In post 111, the worst wrote:do you think inferno is flailing dram?

..and in fact, this actually gives townpoints to the duck for noting the same thing.

VOTE: Skygazer

I feel like the description of raskol's NL vote as "LAMIST" is probably the scummiest thing in the thread so far.

..or at least the most misguided..

In post 125, Elbirn wrote:

In post 123, Skygazer wrote:"Look at me I'm so town"

I was just as confused when I first saw it.

Oh I can already tell this is my least favorite new buzzword

From the makers of WIFOM, your go to kitchen appliance when you just need to throw away someone's argument based on nothing, IT'S LAMIST!

Tired of players who are just too darned good at making their alignment known? Need a way to discredit would-be town leaders, but can't handle the shit storm that would come from you suggesting that 'maybe...they're TOO town"?

Well with just two quick sprays of LAMIST, you'll eradicate

stubborn grass stains

even the most obvious of obvtown, we guarantee it!*

*Warning guarantee is not actually a guarantee your results may vary

this is my new favourite post

In post 117, the worst wrote:alright my current vote is boring anyway

VOTE: Rask

Then again..
Why did the duck follow such a bad vote?

HitAlt can we be friends this game?

In post 113, the worst wrote:oshit xyzzy are you town this time?

yeah dude you know it!

In post 134, the worst wrote:HitAlt can we be friends this game?

If you towntell enough, then sure.
I've never had problem with you, as long as you don't kill people..
And trust me, I'll know if you do!

In post 136, HitAlt wrote:

In post 134, the worst wrote:HitAlt can we be friends this game?

If you towntell enough, then sure.
I've never had problem with you, as long as you don't kill people..
And trust me, I'll know if you do!

your secret identity intrigues me so.

I've played with 9/16 players of this game before.
I have solid grasp of maybe three of those, and you are one of them.

There's a very high chance of me alt-slipping this game though..
But it can't be helped if it happens I guess?

I think I miiiiiiiiight know who hitalt is too

That duck thought he did too in an Open we just finished.
And I bet he doesn't either.

I don't think I've seen your avatar before?
I usually recognize people from them..

I mean there's some pretty comfortable theories about who you are. My initial theory was almost certainly wrong and I suspect people think they know who you are but are wrong.

Curious about the Alt too

Reaction testing with a NL vote is weird but not scummy per se, I think any experienced player would know that they can expect a shitstorm of people talking about using Day 1 and never no-lynching on Day 1 sooooo what's the point entirely?

It's not the no lynch vote itself for me, it's the apparent lack of follow up to it.

In post 127, Ausuka wrote:

In post 78, profii wrote:

In post 73, Raskolnikov wrote:VOTE: No Lynch

Well this is worse than giving us yourself as scum, Elbirn. Wanna wagon your scum buddy here?

Why is this scummy to you?

The following post needs to be read in context of “RVS I suppose”

The self vote was bad - if you are scum, voting yourself is anti win con, if you are town, then we all have wifom over the slot because it could be a random gambit/reaction test but it certainly doesn’t help scum hunt

Then we had he no vote. Obviously excluding vigs, we can only kill scum via lynch so again, anti win con play

Admittedly - it moved us out of RVS

I think I’ll be looking at this Rask wagon in a bit for a serious vote, whilst it’s bad play, I’m not sure I’m calling it scummy. As much as I said to Elbirn lynch your scum buddy, I was more interested to see how he felt about the apparent counter reaction test, I’m assuming he Elbirn is town for trying that play (even though i don’t like it)

What would he need to follow up with if he's actually testing for reactions though

His other posts are decent

pedit he=rask

I don't know, I'd think he'd have more to talk about than one read after all of that discussion

I go to bed and literally the entire world posts while I'm asleep. LITERALLY!

Serious question to everyone, can anyone read profii? Because I always scum read him and its happening again, and I know I can't read him.

Also, HitAlt, am I one of the people you have played with in the past?

Played with you or seen you play.
You are one of the few whose nick I remember better than the avatar.