Mafiascum.net

UNVOTE:

I can't understand anything tazaro is writing and it's already annoying. maruchan reading and commenting on only half the thread to then come back 20 minutes later and answer a brand new question is ehh. gamma purposefully talking in riddles is also rather annoying.

In post 125, Micc wrote:UNVOTE:

I can't understand anything tazaro is writing and it's already annoying. maruchan reading and commenting on only half the thread to then come back 20 minutes later and answer a brand new question is ehh. gamma purposefully talking in riddles is also rather annoying.

Who is scum?

well if I had a good read on that id be voting.

Why wouldn't you use your vote to push someone in order to develop a read?

Hard to determine convincingly in one's own mind how to do so optimally

In post 105, Tazaro wrote:

In post 87, Bicephalous Bob wrote:Gamma has a writing style. I don't remember gamma having a writing style. This feels genuinely paranoid, though:

In post 70, Gamma Emerald wrote:I guess that logic works. Don’t think I’m gonna let that go forever, though, see? I’ll keep it in mind.

but idk

I'm leaning town on maru for discussing contentious stuff without having had the opportunity to read everything.
Taz and Simeon are the easy lynches
kitten seems alright for now

VOTE: jay

Is 'jay' "biceph bob speak" for gamma (emerald)?

This concerns me because later he's talking about how he's read the thread enough but he doesn't know there's a player in the game named Jay. The interaction you and simeon talked about is equally weird. and like I said, 118 to 123, I don't even understand what he's trying to say so I'd appreciate some clarification there.

predit: well I sat down to read the thread 10 minutes ago so how about you just let me go through my process. also add 129 to the list of posts I dont' understand.

In post 130, Micc wrote:This concerns me because later he's talking about how he's read the thread enough but he doesn't know there's a player in the game named Jay.

TBF, it's not like Jay has posted in, like, ever.

yeah. that didn't stop me from figuring it out in less than 30 seconds.

lets talk about your push on simeon. You're voting him because he wouldn't explain his push or something else?

Pre-ninja:
I didn't recollect someone named Jay posting in this thread, and coincidentally I looked at a list the mod gave and may have not spotted JayLow which contributes to not remembering, but it's clear there is a JayLow to me now, but still he hasn't posted so he dropped off my radar.
Post 129 (mine) looks pretty clear to me, but I wrote it, so it may be clearer to me in my bias toward myself
Post-ninja:
Who give a s*** about his push on Simeon when he clearly says it's for developing reads, not necessarily a consequence of scum radar.

antagonism is not meant in a seriously peeved way

^re: s*** bomb that I put in there

In post 132, Micc wrote:lets talk about your push on simeon. You're voting him because he wouldn't explain his push or something else?

That, and 84 in general was a crap post.

In post 133, Tazaro wrote:Who give a s*** about his push on Simeon when he clearly says it's for developing reads, not necessarily a consequence of scum radar.

And you wonder why I'm scumreading you?

Saying it CAN be used for a push absent reads does not mean that I am using MINE simply for a push.

Ok
I subconsciously was a bit angry because I was wondering if Micc was using discussion in a way of trying to pressure you into not doing what you were doing with respect to Simeon, when it does have a logic to it.

Then again I never liked the logic of crap post = higher scum read. I have experience with that being wrong

@Tazaro just out of curiosity, what made you think that jay = Gamma from Bob's 87?

In post 125, Micc wrote: gamma purposefully talking in riddles is also rather annoying.

I think Gamma's posts have been clear so far tbh

In post 140, Simeon wrote:@Tazaro just out of curiosity, what made you think that jay = Gamma from Bob's 87?

I did not think I was just confused back then (but I guess I realized back then that I was confused somewhere in the recesses of the back of my mind) and when I was thrown off guard by the name jay suddenly being mentioned by bob and couldn't remember a jay and then looked at a list perfunctorily and just did not happen to see his name, I kind of was like, oh it's bob who is actually the one who is confused in his posting. But no, I gave him the benefit of the doubt and thought that jay was kind of nicknaming with gamma (as if g could be j and there being a silent y in there somehow)
I was confused and did not piece things together right but i did ask be he did not answer so all i had was my stupid conclusion of what he might have had meant
sorry for that word salad. just trying to do the play by play

In post 133, Tazaro wrote:Who give a s*** about his push on Simeon when he clearly says it's for developing reads, not necessarily a consequence of scum radar.

I care. I don't have a good feel for what direction to scum hunt atm moment. he seems like he does and I was getting town pings from his post so I want to give him a chance to say what he's thinking. If you don't care then don't listen. If I'm asking a specific question to him you don't have to answer and in a lot of cases id prefer you just don't answer.

In post 136, shortaru wrote:

In post 132, Micc wrote:lets talk about your push on simeon. You're voting him because he wouldn't explain his push or something else?

That, and 84 in general was a crap post.

I don't have a problem with him calling maruchan out for those things. I felt pretty similarly myself to be honest.

Pre-ninja: condensed version of my above word salad^: i thought I had a somewhat logical answer for why he said jay (I was like- jay who?), which was a name that did not ring a bell to me, and therefore dismissed for a while the possibility that I might be certainly confused.
Post ninja: that's fair what you said, i guess. See no problem with any of it when i analyze it. Stick to it.

In post 138, Tazaro wrote:Ok
I subconsciously was a bit angry because I was wondering if Micc was using discussion in a way of trying to pressure you into not doing what you were doing with respect to Simeon, when it does have a logic to it.

Fair enough.

In post 139, Tazaro wrote:Then again I never liked the logic of crap post = higher scum read. I have experience with that being wrong

Depends on the kind of crap it is.

There's NAI crap and there's scummy crap.

In post 143, Micc wrote:I don't have a problem with him calling maruchan out for those things. I felt pretty similarly myself to be honest.

That does not surprise me in the least.

im surprised there havent been more responses from some of you (cough MICC) to my post.

It's almost as though a number of you skimmed/didn't read it

In post 122, Tazaro wrote:What does reading the thread a couple more times do that's of any use for the average participant. I'm sure most have read the thread decently and fingers are already being pointed a five people suspected of being scum. We are not clear on this matter, I guess

I meant reads on some of the players, damn it.