In post 123, Nako wrote:I'm not sure if you got me right, I wanted to post 98 then 34 in the same post in order to show I'm answering to the question at 98, then I accidentally quoted 99 instead of 98.
Is making a joke about being scum at the beginning of the day being a liability and thus, deserve to be voted for that alone?
In post 123, Nako wrote:I'm not sure if you got me right, I wanted to post 98 then 34 in the same post in order to show I'm answering to the question at 98, then I accidentally quoted 99 instead of 98.
Is making a joke about being scum at the beginning of the day being a liability and thus, deserve to be voted for that alone?
No, I assumed they are always gonna be like that but whatever.
Kokichi, can you give some information about your scum game and town game please?
Let's say I did have an answer in mind. Why are you voting me for that?
What's wrong with that method of questioning?
Im not voting you for it lol
But to answer the second question, I realize while thinking about it’s not as shoddy of a thing as I thought, I was thinking your questions would not return very effective results if you expected a certain answer to them and you got it, but I realized that’s not really a thing. I basically went after something mundane thinking it esoteric.
In post 118, Nako wrote:What would that change? Why would it be a fake edit?
Now that's such a silly question it almost warrants an immediate vote on you. How can it NOT be when it was done in the same post? You think scum slipped, realized their slip before they posted, and decided to p-edit rather than correct the original statement?
In post 123, Nako wrote:I'm not sure if you got me right, I wanted to post 98 then 34 in the same post in order to show I'm answering to the question at 98, then I accidentally quoted 99 instead of 98.
Is making a joke about being scum at the beginning of the day being a liability and thus, deserve to be voted for that alone?
No, I assumed they are always gonna be like that but whatever.
Kokichi, can you give some information about your scum game and town game please?
I'm good as scum and good as town.
If I was scum would I really give insight as to how I'm different? Silly question. But people here have played with me a lot so maybe they can inform you better. Just letting you know everyone voting me hasn't played with me before. If that helps.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 9:27 am
by Gamma Emerald
I’ve played with you before and still have no idea how to read you
In post 90, Nako wrote:Joey is right, Kokichi has liability, we should lynch him.
Also stan IZ*ONE
Why am I liability.
not liability yet, but most likely candidate to be one so my vote can remain on you until I find someone who is legit super scummy.
In post 104, Sephiroth wrote:Can someone explain to me the 'kokichi is a liability' thing?
I think the numbers from oka are completely NAI. Its not hard to throw some numbers up as scum if you're being so vague about it. Not sure why anyone is tr-ing him for that.
ive played with kokichi once before in a meme-y kinda game. https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=84&t=76496
he was kinda low content but then again so was everyone. i was completely lost in that game and couldn't get a read on kokichi. feel like he might be setting himself up as a lylo liability with how things have transpired so yeah.
hopefully this deincentivizes a development into that game's playstyle cuz honestly that game was won basically off a 50/50 coin flip which is eww
In post 105, Joey_ wrote:Claiming mefia sub page 5 is not being a liability
>Implying you are going to policy someone (or people in general) because they are a threat to lylo
May I get an explanation? Feeling town on the vote rn, shows honest follow-up to earlier thinking
I really dislike your post about the liability thing, especially since the whole post is an echo chamber and shading gerry for something i disagree on. Also, you arent voting coherently when you basically agree that hes a liability and i dont remember you being shy of voting people early game.
@chicken : no what, be clearer if you want to be understood (general tip)
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 1:02 pm
by OkaPoka
no as in policy lynching someone is playing against my win con
ive witnessed too many recent games where town loses because they aren't willing to go after anti town players early on, and then come lylo they pick the wrong lylo liabilities to hang because scum are able to use charisma to dodge lynches.
either we deal with lylo liabilities now or we stop considering charisma into our equation, but i doubt the latter is possible.
no more nicknames please because i dont follow and dont want to try and follow.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 1:30 pm
by Joey_
In post 138, OkaPoka wrote:pick the wrong lylo liabilities to hang because scum are able to use charisma to dodge lynches.
lmao that sum up why i think its a terrible plan, simply because more often than not scum is actively doing their best to not be textbook anti-town. Town wins when mefia are dead, not when the anti-town liabilities are
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 1:51 pm
by Almost50
FTR, this has been the slowest game I've been in for a while. Less than 6 pages in 30 hours??
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 2:59 pm
by Tchill13
Would you rather it be bum rushed? I can single handedly make that happen. Usually on later day phases though.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:02 pm
by PenguinPower
Are you still trying to change your approach to day 1, Tchill?
May I get an explanation? Feeling town on the vote rn, shows honest follow-up to earlier thinking
I really dislike your post about the liability thing, especially since the whole post is an echo chamber and shading gerry for something i disagree on. Also, you arent voting coherently when you basically agree that hes a liability and i dont remember you being shy of voting people early game.
@chicken : no what, be clearer if you want to be understood (general tip)
KOKICHI ISNT GERRY...LMAOOOOO
Although if he is multiple that lmao by 10
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:08 pm
by PenguinPower
Why are you so sure?
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:10 pm
by Gamma Emerald
Kokichi is almost certainly not an alt
But if he is I had the sense Kokichi seemed like Gerryoat since I first encountered Kokichi
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:13 pm
by PenguinPower
I find it amazing that anyone can say with certainty that someone else isn’t an alt absent those straight from the newbie queue.
Kokichi is probably scum right now. It’s a good way for me to start my reads.
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:18 pm
by Gamma Emerald
In post 145, Gamma Emerald wrote:Kokichi is almost certainly not an alt
But if he is I had the sense Kokichi seemed like Gerryoat since I first encountered Kokichi
Hm...
I need to check something. If I get what I think I will Kokichi’s alt equity will rise a fair amount
Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2018 3:18 pm
by Tchill13
In post 138, OkaPoka wrote:no as in policy lynching someone is playing against my win con
ive witnessed too many recent games where town loses because they aren't willing to go after anti town players early on, and then come lylo they pick the wrong lylo liabilities to hang because scum are able to use charisma to dodge lynches.
either we deal with lylo liabilities now or we stop considering charisma into our equation, but i doubt the latter is possible.
no more nicknames please because i dont follow and dont want to try and follow.