Newbie 1906 | Fractals | Over

YellowSnow · Post Post #125 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:07 pm

Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?

Alonzo · Post Post #126 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:08 pm

I feel like this isn't TTTT's first Rodeo...

TTTT · Post Post #127 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:11 pm

In post 126, Alonzo wrote:I feel like this isn't TTTT's first Rodeo...

I played a lot in late 2016 through the first half of 2017 and have been MIA since.

What's your take on yellow's unvote when Nikk got to L-1?

TTTT · Post Post #128 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:12 pm

In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?

ok so this post looks more lynch-baity than scummy

YellowSnow · Post Post #129 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:12 pm

In post 123, TTTT wrote:@yellowsnow
what's your experience with online forum mafia?

Just reading through a few games, why?

TTTT · Post Post #130 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:13 pm

@Yellow

you still have't answered GrandW's 1st question in 79

TTTT · Post Post #131 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:13 pm

In post 129, YellowSnow wrote:Just reading through a few games, why?

just trying to sort you

YellowSnow · Post Post #132 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:14 pm

In post 83, YellowSnow wrote:
In post 79, GrandWazoo wrote:
In post 77, YellowSnow wrote:I must admit I'm not comfortable with the "expeerienced" players skill level so far and find myself somewhat agreeing with Nikk. Don't want a quick lynch.

Unvote
What about the experienced players actions makes you uncomfortable. What about Nikk's do you agree with?
FF's appeal to experience. The naked vote to L-1.

I answered it.

Nikk · Post Post #133 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:16 pm

In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?

My scumleans aren't based on votes on me, so no.

TTTT · Post Post #134 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:18 pm

In post 128, TTTT wrote:
In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?
ok so this post looks more lynch-baity than scummy

but maybe it's more newbscum survivalistic than lynch-baity
when looked at as a follow-up to this:

YellowSnow wrote:Well then.

I'm not going to play the WIFOM game.

unvote
.

Still think TTTT is scum and Nikk is town but it's not worth dying over this early.

YellowSnow · Post Post #135 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:19 pm

In post 133, Nikk wrote:
In post 125, YellowSnow wrote:Would you continue to vote for someone to defend someone when the person you're defending is attacking you?
My scumleans aren't based on votes on me, so no.

I know you are reaction testing me which is fine, and I'm pretty sure you are town, but sometimes you have to lose the battle to win the war and I'm not willing to lose the war over you.

TTTT · Post Post #136 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:21 pm

Yellow, I hate to break it to you but I don't think this is a reaction test.

A reaction test is more like when you enter a game, immediately put someone at L-1 and then wait to see who jumps off the wagon.

YellowSnow · Post Post #137 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:22 pm

That's a very narrow definition.

TTTT · Post Post #138 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:23 pm

it's just one example

Alonzo · Post Post #139 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:24 pm

In post 74, Alonzo wrote:
In post 72, TTTT wrote:unnecessary bickering
which posts?

Did you answer this?? I looked but could not see

TTTT · Post Post #140 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:27 pm

Yellow - I just read your first game and now I'm going to feel kinda bad if you end up being a mislynch day1

YellowSnow · Post Post #141 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:29 pm

lol that wasn't really a game.

I don't want a pity save. Judge me on my merits.

GrandWazoo · Post Post #142 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:30 pm

OK, one more time Yellow... what makes you think Nikk is town?

YellowSnow · Post Post #143 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:31 pm

In post 142, GrandWazoo wrote:OK, one more time Yellow... what makes you think Nikk is town?

Probably more gut than anything right now, it's still early. I like his abrasiveness and his willingness to stand by his convictions. He is using actual arguments rather than things like appeal to authority.

TTTT · Post Post #144 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:33 pm

@Alonzo - Formerfish and Nikk on pages 2 & 3
but looking back now I don't think there's anything there

Alonzo · Post Post #145 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:34 pm

https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=77614

check FF in the scumchat here, this sort of thing is his bag baby...

Alonzo · Post Post #146 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:35 pm

I still don't trust Nikk at all. I would expect FF to open high aggro as either alignment.

TTTT · Post Post #147 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:36 pm

the real question for me right now is Yellow

lynchbait?
or
newbscum?

YellowSnow · Post Post #148 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:37 pm

post #80 from that game in the scumchat:

Formerfish:
Let me go back and look.

I tend to tunnel as town

so that's why I've been going ham at reaper..

GrandWazoo · Post Post #149 (ISO) » Mon Dec 17, 2018 2:40 pm

In post 116, Nikk wrote:
In post 115, TTTT wrote:I'm not tunneling you Nikk. It's page 5.

You picked three interesting choices for my reads. I'll answer then I want to know why you asked about those three.

very minor scumleans on:
yellow
formerfish

Alfonzo looks townish

it's super early so these are very very weak reads
Fish Nuetral
Alonzo Townlead

Yellow big ol honkin scum read.

He appears to be trying to get townpoints by preventing my lynch.

Same about early and being weak reads. Especially with how aggressive in nature people are here. I'm used to a touch more civility haha.

In post 143, YellowSnow wrote:
In post 142, GrandWazoo wrote:OK, one more time Yellow... what makes you think Nikk is town?
Probably more gut than anything right now, it's still early. I like his abrasiveness and his willingness to stand by his convictions. He is using actual arguments rather than things like appeal to authority.

Do your gut like his read on you?