Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2019 2:19 pm
Yeah it's almost as easy as sayingIn post 116, Slaxx wrote:You see how easy it is to deflect with semantics?
but it was a reaaaaaction test...
Yeah it's almost as easy as sayingIn post 116, Slaxx wrote:You see how easy it is to deflect with semantics?
It was what, page 3? You want to try and tell me that that sort of thing isn't common that early?In post 125, Persivul wrote:Yeah it's almost as easy as sayingIn post 116, Slaxx wrote:You see how easy it is to deflect with semantics?but it was a reaaaaaction test...
Wait... you think I was actually concerned about an l1 on page 3? Egix wasn't getting lynched, he was being pressured. But he wasn't actually being pressured to respond to anything. Reaction test, okay. It's pretty convenient, but I see what you could mean. But your case on me is made up because you're super hypocritical in several ways already pointed out by pers and I bothIn post 121, Slaxx wrote:Because it flips town.In post 120, Persivul wrote:Why do you think a wagon is worthy of blame?
Based off of how fast that formed, and how milk (and maybe you) reacted, I am working under the assumption that it flips town.
I'm not hypocritical, you just either have terrible reading comprehension or you're arguing in bad faith.In post 127, themilkcartonkid wrote:Wait... you think I was actually concerned about an l1 on page 3? Egix wasn't getting lynched, he was being pressured. But he wasn't actually being pressured to respond to anything. Reaction test, okay. It's pretty convenient, but I see what you could mean. But your case on me is made up because you're super hypocritical in several ways already pointed out by pers and I bothIn post 121, Slaxx wrote:Because it flips town.In post 120, Persivul wrote:Why do you think a wagon is worthy of blame?
Based off of how fast that formed, and how milk (and maybe you) reacted, I am working under the assumption that it flips town.
Common doesn't make it acceptable to me.In post 126, Slaxx wrote:It was what, page 3? You want to try and tell me that that sort of thing isn't common that early?
If that's to me: to be honest, you're right, I wasn't reading that closely. Now I have, and I think you're probably town. You noted yourself that Bujaber's vote was bad. You ought to move there before someone derphammers milk. Milk's actions have been reasonable.In post 128, Slaxx wrote:Shit man if you're gonna take swipes on me just keep your vote there.
Dude, I cant read your mind. You. Have. To. Communicate. The first time. Your follow up could not be inferred from your initial post.In post 129, Slaxx wrote:I'm not hypocritical, you just either have terrible reading comprehension or you're arguing in bad faith.In post 127, themilkcartonkid wrote:Wait... you think I was actually concerned about an l1 on page 3? Egix wasn't getting lynched, he was being pressured. But he wasn't actually being pressured to respond to anything. Reaction test, okay. It's pretty convenient, but I see what you could mean. But your case on me is made up because you're super hypocritical in several ways already pointed out by pers and I bothIn post 121, Slaxx wrote:Because it flips town.In post 120, Persivul wrote:Why do you think a wagon is worthy of blame?
Based off of how fast that formed, and how milk (and maybe you) reacted, I am working under the assumption that it flips town.
My gut is telling me door #2.
What history do you have with him?In post 134, Slaxx wrote:A little off topic but maybe relevant
But I get why reaction tests could be labelled convenient retroactively
But given that I can read Egix easily and it was start of game it's a pretty expected and logical move to make
And ya know, you can't exactly say it up front, so.
I read him correctly as scum in davesaz (?) C9++ (Open)In post 135, themilkcartonkid wrote:What history do you have with him?In post 134, Slaxx wrote:A little off topic but maybe relevant
But I get why reaction tests could be labelled convenient retroactively
But given that I can read Egix easily and it was start of game it's a pretty expected and logical move to make
And ya know, you can't exactly say it up front, so.
In post 93, BuJaber wrote:This feels kinda LAMIST to me.In post 74, themilkcartonkid wrote:I am 100% for pressure, but there isn't any real pressure here. What question or incident is being responded to here? If anything, we need to pressure slaxx or rb for their weird psuedo serious votes
But also 5 votes on the first real wagon on the game.. that's gotta have scum on it. Like almost every game I play the first wagon that starts to look serious disappears later and someone else becomes the day 1 lynch so it's a safe vote for scum to park on.
There you go.. congratulations anyone who didn't vote for egix or is not milk.. you're town by PoE.
VOTE: Milk
In post 94, BuJaber wrote:In post 77, Slaxx wrote:That was a reaction test on Egix and the fact a bunch of other people sheeped me and decided to start piling on while making sure to mention the lynch was mine probably means it flips town.
Which part was the reaction test? The vote or the 5/5 thing?
Also what made him pass the test?
Dude, chill. I thought you were advising us to be civil back on Page 2?In post 118, Slaxx wrote:Are you even fucking reading you illiterate shithead?
Why is 4Ts town for you? I think he's been being pretty opportunistic with his votes.In post 99, Lovebird wrote:Slaxx towny. Maybe egix and tttt too. I'm OK with my vote rn, but milk is good wagon that I might switch to.