Mafiascum.net

Aura feels village feels good man

In post 123, DoubtingThomas wrote:you are telling me that in a game of lying and deceiving it is scummy for me to not take in what another person is saying as a lord almighty truth of the holy spirit objective fact immediately?

Why didn't you ask me to back up my assertion, then?

In post 124, Auro wrote:

In post 118, DoubtingThomas wrote:too many people just saying, "XXX posts that all the time" on this website to just simply comment on my well-thought out cases and try to shade it.

Except it's not "shade", it's a fact I can back up with evidence that contradicts your "case".

ok start bringing evidence that contradicts other people's "case" on you tbh

In post 127, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 124, Auro wrote:

In post 118, DoubtingThomas wrote:too many people just saying, "XXX posts that all the time" on this website to just simply comment on my well-thought out cases and try to shade it.

Except it's not "shade", it's a fact I can back up with evidence that contradicts your "case".

ok start bringing evidence that contradicts other people's "case" on you tbh

What's the case on him

nothing

Why are we spatting over it then

This is really far to go for a rvs wagon.

Scum Reading has the only non RVS reason to vote me as far as I can see, and I explained why it was incorrect.

Who are you talking to fur

The hallmark of rvs is wagons based on nothing. Defending it is . . . counterproductive?

In post 126, Auro wrote:

In post 123, DoubtingThomas wrote:you are telling me that in a game of lying and deceiving it is scummy for me to not take in what another person is saying as a lord almighty truth of the holy spirit objective fact immediately?

Why didn't you ask me to back up my assertion, then?

because i dont think anyone would straight up lie about things that could be proven, and cases built on a single post being >rand xxx is not really worth clinging on to so just ur words are good enough for now, but i think it's atrocious that RC is attacking me as if your word is pure 'objective fact' that i am being way defensive about when talking to you about this

In post 133, Fuscosco wrote:The hallmark of rvs is wagons based on nothing. Defending it is . . . counterproductive?

I would prefer votes not be placed at all

In post 128, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 127, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 124, Auro wrote:

In post 118, DoubtingThomas wrote:too many people just saying, "XXX posts that all the time" on this website to just simply comment on my well-thought out cases and try to shade it.

Except it's not "shade", it's a fact I can back up with evidence that contradicts your "case".

ok start bringing evidence that contradicts other people's "case" on you tbh

What's the case on him

nothing

A friend of mine said this to me once

"
???

It's page 4"

the case is that he has couple posts i thnik were >rand scummy and worth talking about. so i am going from there

In post 135, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 133, Fuscosco wrote:The hallmark of rvs is wagons based on nothing. Defending it is . . . counterproductive?

I would prefer votes not be placed at all

Your highness, please let me know when you think it's okay for me to place votes

No they're not and your reads are shit or you're scum

I'm not able to reconcile your response here with your "I don't care for meta" response.

VOTE: DoubtingThomas

In post 138, RadiantCowbells wrote:No they're not and your reads are shit or you're scum

or your reads are shit and i am right

In post 139, Auro wrote:I'm not able to reconcile your response here with your "I don't care for meta" response.

VOTE: DoubtingThomas

really atrocious

In post 140, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 138, RadiantCowbells wrote:No they're not and your reads are shit or you're scum

or your reads are shit and i am right

Says the person who mislynched myself JC and another obvtown player consecutively gjgj

No DT you can really just die

If this is your town contribution to the thread we are stronger as a town lynching you d1

In post 136, DoubtingThomas wrote:the case is that he has couple posts i thnik were >rand scummy and worth talking about. so i am going from there

Which ones, and why?
No one's explained it so far as far as I can see, how would you expect me to respond to the "case" then?

In post 143, RadiantCowbells wrote:No DT you can really just die

If this is your town contribution to the thread we are stronger as a town lynching you d1

oh because i don't town read someone you town read?

lolu

In post 144, Auro wrote:

In post 136, DoubtingThomas wrote:the case is that he has couple posts i thnik were >rand scummy and worth talking about. so i am going from there

Which ones, and why?
No one's explained it so far as far as I can see, how would you expect me to respond to the "case" then?

go back and read my 10 posts ive ever made in this thread, tbh

In post 142, RadiantCowbells wrote:

In post 140, DoubtingThomas wrote:

In post 138, RadiantCowbells wrote:No they're not and your reads are shit or you're scum

or your reads are shit and i am right

Says the person who mislynched myself JC and another obvtown player consecutively gjgj

literally a different game. literally a lot of it is your atrocious play there too. stop constantly mentioning a dark history for the both of us. everyone else but you blamed you as a major reason for that game

I gave you the abrupt no you're being stupid you threw a fit at me and called me scum. Auto did the same you got defensive and said you didn't believe in meta. Kinda feels like you just... don't want to back off this read. So either you're scum or you're derp town whose ego gets wounded by someone telling you you're being dumb when you objectively are and you knee jerk overcommit instead of actually playing in good faith. Not a good set of options

I have, I fail to see a case on me. Maybe I'm just dumb, quote please?