Mafiascum.net

In post 120, light_ganski wrote:

In post 119, Dunnstral wrote: This post is kind of weird

Can you elaborate?

Yeah, I think it's strange too

hmmmm

Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

Im less interested in your response and more in how demon and ausuka interplayed. But decent response.

Dave is also good. Good dave

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

^This. Who has a confident scum read on page 3?

It feels like derailment tactic if anything

*like a derailment tactic

Exciting stuff so far.

everyone just keep figuring out the game for me thanks

In post 107, StarwingBeauvoi wrote:Do you have any theories?

Oh and if you aren't distracted, I was wondering what your avatar is?

I think that demonlord was just rvs shitposting and that there wasn't anything worth distracting from at that time - therefore idk why scum!Demon would try to distract us.

my avatar is pichu.

In post 132, Vedith wrote:Exciting stuff so far.

Really ?!?

In post 135, StarwingBeauvoi wrote:Really ?!?

Yes.

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

The reason I asked was because I can't follow the progression of "this could be town and this could be scum" then a vote. Like that's the definition of null and I know she said "I think it could be scum" but I don't really know how much confidence that's meant to convey and it altogether came across as non-comittal. Also I am literally voting the same person as light so why do you think I'm derailing the push that was exactly the same push as hers?

In post 130, light_ganski wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

^This. Who has a confident scum read on page 3?

It feels like derailment tactic if anything

If you think this why didn't you say anything before Dunnstral posted?

VOTE: lightganski

In post 137, Ausuka wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

The reason I asked was because I can't follow the progression of "this could be town and this could be scum" then a vote. Like that's the definition of null and I know she said "I think it could be scum" but I don't really know how much confidence that's meant to convey and it altogether came across as non-comittal. Also I am literally voting the same person as light so why do you think I'm derailing the push that was exactly the same push as hers?

The reason it seems non-committal is because it's page 5 and I'm not gonna base a case off of one post on page 5 of a large theme. Perhaps I was too vague in my comment on that post but I meant it in the sense of "this is scummier than null, enough to warrant a pressure vote at least, but could realistically be something town would do at this stage.

In post 137, Ausuka wrote:

In post 130, light_ganski wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

^This. Who has a confident scum read on page 3?

It feels like derailment tactic if anything

If you think this why didn't you say anything before Dunnstral posted?

VOTE: lightganski

Because I hadn't really thought on a deeper level about the connection between the posts until dunn brought it up? Sometimes you don't really think about things until someone points them out

But your defensiveness to the suggestion is pretty suspicious

In post 50, Wisdom wrote:

In post 45, Enigma wrote:hi all

In post 47, Enigma wrote:hi ofrhz

Why no vote?

i forgot sorry

In post 133, Clemency wrote:everyone just keep figuring out the game for me thanks

+1

/popcorn

you forgot but youre still not voting

I've loosely kept up but are we about to exit the RVS stage now?

I hope so.
We had a good thing going with a Gamma wagon but people wanted to stop that.
vOv

In post 121, Sabrina LeCutie wrote:

In post 85, wilky wrote:

In post 82, Sabrina LeCutie wrote:
Sorry, that's not really an option. >:(

Ok then. You get lynched today now.

..if you think it has anything to do with the game, then you're wrong. You can't just say that someone sucks and expect them not to take it negatively.

There's no reason to be so mean, it's just a game.

Wait are you actually taking what I said as serious? Take a chill pill and reread my posts I was making a joke about my OMGUS vote on you.

In post 137, Ausuka wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

The reason I asked was because I can't follow the progression of "this could be town and this could be scum" then a vote. Like that's the definition of null and I know she said "I think it could be scum" but I don't really know how much confidence that's meant to convey and it altogether came across as non-comittal. Also I am literally voting the same person as light so why do you think I'm derailing the push that was exactly the same push as hers?

In post 130, light_ganski wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

^This. Who has a confident scum read on page 3?

It feels like derailment tactic if anything

If you think this why didn't you say anything before Dunnstral posted?

VOTE: lightganski

This looks scummy to me like the whole reason was made up after being called out

In post 139, light_ganski wrote:

In post 137, Ausuka wrote:

In post 130, light_ganski wrote:

In post 127, Dunnstral wrote:Asking someone for how confident they are so early feels like it weakens someone elses push rather than sort out reads

^This. Who has a confident scum read on page 3?

It feels like derailment tactic if anything

If you think this why didn't you say anything before Dunnstral posted?

VOTE: lightganski

Because I hadn't really thought on a deeper level about the connection between the posts until dunn brought it up? Sometimes you don't really think about things until someone points them out

But your defensiveness to the suggestion is pretty suspicious

+1 on this

VOTE: ausuka

This is the internet. Jokes don't always translate through text.

All I'm saying is that I'm going through a difficult time in my life, so using such rude and insensitive words to me is more likely to make me just ask to be replaced then continue playing. Choose your words more carefully. I deal with enough nastiness like that day to day based on my gender identity, I don't like dealing with vitriolic comments like that outside of it either.

In post 147, Sabrina LeCutie wrote:This is the internet. Jokes don't always translate through text.

All I'm saying is that I'm going through a difficult time in my life, so using such rude and insensitive words to me is more likely to make me just ask to be replaced then continue playing. Choose your words more carefully. I deal with enough nastiness like that day to day based on my gender identity, I don't like dealing with vitriolic comments like that outside of it either.

Oh fuck off will be it was the most obvious least subtle joke ive made in my life.

Come on now, let's get to page 12 before causing a replace out.
Just a mis understanding \o/