In post 123, Blake Belladonna wrote:I think people are confusing me planning around the coalition failing with me being pessimistic about it failing?
I mean.
What exactly is the problem here?
It really does look like you've no confidence with your approach, and it feels like you're overthinking it a little bit too much. Previous cases of coalitions failing have nothing to do with this game, and saying stuff like "I'd rather be out of coalition" isn't exactly a good look.
In post 119, Skygazer wrote:dont think quest actually SRs me here after marathoning w me this morning
That's a really bad (not good) read.
i mean u saw me get mislynched like 3 times so you know im an easy push and correctly read me when i was town then iirc
Marathon games are fuck-around games. I've played non-marathon game(s?) with you, and I can't say that I'm sold on the fact that you're an easy push.
i mean im not easy to lynch by any means in non-marathons but thats different than what i meant by pushing
My point is that, do you really think I would come to the conclusion that you're an easy push / lynch based on a few marathon games that all lasted under 25 minutes? That seems far-fetched.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:23 am
by Skygazer
tbf to ank i opposed having myself in the coalition last time i played this setup
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:23 am
by skitter30
deadline:
(expired on 2019-06-02 23:00:00)
mod notes:
- weiss schnee is v/la until marathon weekend is over
- please let me know if i made any mistakes; i'm going to probably play with the formatting and make it easier to read (tomorow night tho)
- click here for joined mod iso
In post 119, Skygazer wrote:dont think quest actually SRs me here after marathoning w me this morning
That's a really bad (not good) read.
i mean u saw me get mislynched like 3 times so you know im an easy push and correctly read me when i was town then iirc
Marathon games are fuck-around games. I've played non-marathon game(s?) with you, and I can't say that I'm sold on the fact that you're an easy push.
i mean im not easy to lynch by any means in non-marathons but thats different than what i meant by pushing
My point is that, do you really think I would come to the conclusion that you're an easy push / lynch based on a few marathon games that all lasted under 25 minutes? That seems far-fetched.
i mean this is a similar situation wrt rt interactions
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:24 am
by Quest
In post 131, Skygazer wrote:tbf to ank i opposed having myself in the coalition last time i played this setup
Do you think it makes what I said wrong? From my point of view, it's a very low-confidence approach to the setup.
In post 119, Skygazer wrote:dont think quest actually SRs me here after marathoning w me this morning
That's a really bad (not good) read.
i mean u saw me get mislynched like 3 times so you know im an easy push and correctly read me when i was town then iirc
Marathon games are fuck-around games. I've played non-marathon game(s?) with you, and I can't say that I'm sold on the fact that you're an easy push.
i mean im not easy to lynch by any means in non-marathons but thats different than what i meant by pushing
My point is that, do you really think I would come to the conclusion that you're an easy push / lynch based on a few marathon games that all lasted under 25 minutes? That seems far-fetched.
i mean this is a similar situation wrt rt interactions
I disagree. I purposefully play more like myself when in marathon games because those games are just meant to be fun for me as opposed to playing my heart out for my win condition. Coming to the conclusion that I think you're an easy lynch based off of that seems exaggerated to me.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:26 am
by Tim Goodman
I don't understand all the meta comparisons being made
In post 131, Skygazer wrote:tbf to ank i opposed having myself in the coalition last time i played this setup
Do you think it makes what I said wrong? From my point of view, it's a very low-confidence approach to the setup.
i agree w you
but there aren't any strong consensus TRs yet and i feel like ank would be playing townier as scum rather than making the ??? tim/quest read based on the potential slip
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:27 am
by Skygazer
i dont think low-confidence = scum
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:27 am
by Blake Belladonna
I'm confused why having a gameplan for play post-coalition-failing means I'm low confidence (?)
In post 119, Skygazer wrote:dont think quest actually SRs me here after marathoning w me this morning
That's a really bad (not good) read.
i mean u saw me get mislynched like 3 times so you know im an easy push and correctly read me when i was town then iirc
Marathon games are fuck-around games. I've played non-marathon game(s?) with you, and I can't say that I'm sold on the fact that you're an easy push.
i mean im not easy to lynch by any means in non-marathons but thats different than what i meant by pushing
My point is that, do you really think I would come to the conclusion that you're an easy push / lynch based on a few marathon games that all lasted under 25 minutes? That seems far-fetched.
i mean this is a similar situation wrt rt interactions
I disagree. I purposefully play more like myself when in marathon games because those games are just meant to be fun for me as opposed to playing my heart out for my win condition. Coming to the conclusion that I think you're an easy lynch based off of that seems exaggerated to me.
In post 131, Skygazer wrote:tbf to ank i opposed having myself in the coalition last time i played this setup
Do you think it makes what I said wrong? From my point of view, it's a very low-confidence approach to the setup.
i agree w you
but there aren't any strong consensus TRs yet and i feel like ank would be playing townier as scum rather than making the ??? tim/quest read based on the potential slip
Ank's town here. I'm not arguing any of this because of her alignment, I'm arguing with her because I would expect her to not approach the setup this way. I know she's able to get good reads, and her approach almost makes it feel like she thinks she won't be able to. Everyone that's sided with town today should be playing to win with the coalition, and if it fails, then it's whatever, this player list is more than capable of winning during mountainous.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:29 am
by Tim Goodman
What if I actually suck at mafia
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:29 am
by Blake Belladonna
You could say I don't have confidence in my reads, which is true since I don't have particularly strong reads at this point, but I independently find it pretty silly to bank everything on the coalition succeeding.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:30 am
by Quest
In post 144, Blake Belladonna wrote:You could say I don't have confidence in my reads, which is true since I don't have particularly strong reads at this point, but I independently find it pretty silly to bank everything on the coalition succeeding.
Do you think it's silly coming from me, though?
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:30 am
by Quest
Like, you can understand where I'm coming from, right?
In post 113, Skygazer wrote:in the last coalition game no lunch suggested a coalition of ppl of ppl who are town and easy to read lategame moreso than just town
i agree w that take
you townreading me yet?
ehhh not sure how my posting got any better and i thought u were pushing for me to react to the hurt rather than actually scumreading my shitpost
i do not understand this post
i asked if you're townreading me and you responded by talking about how *i* should be reading *you*?
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:30 am
by Tim Goodman
If the coalition fails you play from there. I don't think that we should plan around it to the point of not putting the towniest list possible in the coalition.
Posted: Fri May 24, 2019 10:31 am
by Skygazer
i think the smartest play is to vote the least towniest coalition member when it passes hence my nsg vote shes scum affffff
