Mafiascum.net

In post 109, u r a person 2 wrote:

In post 63, EspressoPatronum wrote:

In post 60, Klick wrote:Sorry: I have a light scumread on Detective Pikachu. Can you spot why?

I don't see anything. His posts with Tim are jokes on the DP movie. Maybe his entrance vote on Klick, but even that was setting up the interactions with Tim.

Care to explain your read?

I think this post is townie. It's not the only one but it's super town indicative I think so I'm singling it out

Redpanda, otoh, is likely scum. Their posts feel like those of a hyperposter. Like, read a post in isolation and it feels like it's coming from someone who is making moves and getting reads from how others respond

except they're not doing that. The disconnect is likely scum-indicative

Red is town.

In post 116, ClearlyClarity wrote:Some townies saw your reaction tests for what they really are and didn't bother responding, which makes your complaint about town doing nothing pretty redundant there

It's one thing to not engage if they were doing something else but at that point they were letting the game stall.

u r a person 2
Detective Pikachu
Cinnamon


EspressoPatronum


Klick

ClearlyClarity
Tim Goodman

In post 117, Klick wrote:^^^

RP, if you already thought Pikachu and I was TvT, why not mention that before now? That's worth mentioning, that could start a discussion.
Why do you think that, anyway?

You're spending an awful lot of time doing things that you now say should have zero bearing on your alignment. And they're not engaging discussion - this is evident in the fact that no one engaged with them. So what are you actually doing?

Do I really need to mention it? I'd rather not butt in and focus on other players while still monitoring your slots and my read on the both of you is before you both engaged each other and I'd rather not reveal why.

In post 119, Lil Uzi Vert wrote:

In post 94, Klick wrote:

I voted you because a wagon with three votes is more interesting than a wagon with two votes.

Then why not say this at the time? I found your vote odd because there was zero explanation behind it. It seemed like it was placed with the intent of drawing no attention, as opposed to starting discussion.

In post 92, Klick wrote:I'd rather get any response from Pikachu before laying all my cards on the table!

Why is it okay for you to hold your cards but not him?

Order of operations. I asked Pikachu a question in Post 74, and before he answered it I got a few questions about my question. I wanted the question answered before I went into great detail about why I asked it. That seems like a good reason to temporarily withhold reasoning.
Meanwhile, does Pikachu have a reason to not bring up his reasoning? That's what I want to find out. My proposed explanation is that he's scum who wanted to avoid drawing attention to himself.

Fair enough, RP. But sometime soon I'd love to revisit this.

Cinnamon


EspressoPatronum

Pink Ball

ceejayvinoya
ClearlyClarity

Is the pinkball a meta read?

In post 131, RedPanda wrote:Is the pinkball a meta read?

I was going to ask the same

In [url=https://forum.mafiascum.net/viewtopic.php?p=11051816#p11051816]post 124[/url], Lil Uzi Vert wrote: I’m voting him because I kinda think he was being intentionally obtuse in 64 but I like 69. I relate to it a lot and find myself in that position more often than I would like. No pun intended.

Re: 64 , I know that Creature and Klick talked in between his Klick and DP votes, but I wanted more of an explanation. He said his vote was to help pressure DP, but does that also mean he thinks Klick is more town?

It just seemed like a weak pivot shortly after making the wagon a "serious deal"

VOTE: ClearlyClarity
Didn't really respond to the lurker prod + Clarity's posts thus far don't give us much information.

I'll also be keeping an eye out for Cinnamon's post(s) in the near future.

I'm reasonably confident EP is scum.

In post 135, Tim Goodman wrote:I'm reasonably confident EP is scum.

You've gone from a gut read to "reasonably confident" ... care to explain?

In post 135, Tim Goodman wrote:I'm reasonably confident EP is scum.

Hey, we agree! I think... If EP is the one who posted what I'm thinking

Your approach to the game is a scum one.

In post 107, EspressoPatronum wrote:Interested to hear some thoughts from the following people:

u r a person 2
Lil Uzi Vert
Cinnamon
ClearlyClarity

Lurker scum can be pretty dangerous. These four haven't posted much yet.

Yeah, he is

In post 138, RadiantCowbells wrote:Your approach to the game is a scum one.

Haha now everyone knows

In post 138, RadiantCowbells wrote:Your approach to the game is a scum one.

Goddamnit.

We'll still call you Tim, don't worry

damn, one of my cats received euthanasia today.

Let me see what I can do for this town

In post 78, u r a person 2 wrote:I played pokemon red when it came out. it was okay

haven't touched the stuff since

but making animals fight each other is cruel. did you know that millennials who consider themselves pokemon fans are less likely to think dog fighting is wrong than those who don't? yeah, that's some messed up stuff, huh?

Yep, we should make fetuses fight each other

In post 82, Klick wrote:Alright Creature, I'm starting to see your point.

Glad you're doing.

What should we do now?

In post 85, RedPanda wrote:

In post 75, Creature wrote:

In post 72, RedPanda wrote:

Vote Ceejay

SRS vote.

rly.

Did he ever post?

Yup one post.

Yup one post scumcatcher here

Okay you're town

doesn't mean you aren't being awkward here

In post 86, RedPanda wrote:Also town stop being so useless.

Hahahahahaha

In post 91, ceejayvinoya wrote:Also noticed that creature never responded to this.

I only answer what I want.

However, I'll admit I missed that rather than intentionally skipped it.