Mafiascum.net

Me: shows wimpy contradicting himself in 120
Wimpy: aight imma head out

In post 117, alimdia wrote:Btw I didn't vote you because of your shit case against Wimpy. I voted you because of the original quote where I voted you.

But looks like we're getting some content here even if it's 90% fluff.

I mean that’s a p terrible reason to vote me chief

In post 119, alimdia wrote:I'm actually just gonna step back and let the other people chime in with their thoughts before this becomes a 10 page pool of fluff and people don't bother reading half of it.

In post 124, Wimpy wrote:

In post 111, Datisi wrote:Wimpy are you blind

Also on this note I’ll log off. I have a feeling things will get more hostile than this and I do not want more hostility

Interesting

In post 114, Datisi wrote:Wait a second

How is "trying too hard to be nonchalant" illogical

But "referencing past games is awkward and therefore scummy" not illogical

Like

Cause he has to be able to prove I’m acting and not actually being nonchalant. Rvs is fun time. That’s when people are the most relaxed. I was having fun. I wasn’t pretending to have fun.

Referencing past games the way you did is scummy to me. Nobody has to agree with me. You didn’t have to get defensive about it. Mental didn’t have to get defensive either.

I feel there are much better ways to rvs than “oh you were scum last time” and the few times I’ve seen it have come from scum not knowing how to rvs as scum.

Aight cool. Rvs is fun to me and referencing a game that me and a friend of mine barely won after being in a very shit position is fun to me. And using bs like that to call someome scummy is something I've seen come from scum.

In post 121, Wimpy wrote:

In post 106, Menalque wrote:If I say “wimpy is scum because his tone is super insecure” then that’s a logical reason even if someone disagrees with me

That reason is illogical cause you can’t determine tone. I’m playing a game and having fun and you probably can’t pick up my humor.

I’ve provided a logical reason, you just disagreed with.

You can’t say my reason is illogical, you can just say you disagree with it because I assure you my reasons for my votes have all been very logical

to me

I mean, yes, you can determine tone in a game and it’s a perfectly valid reason to SR someone

Your reasons are illogical because they don’t correspond to an actual metric of whether someone is scum or not

In post 118, Datisi wrote:

In post 116, Wimpy wrote:But you haven’t provided reasons for why I’m scum, logical or illogical

you literally just called his reasoning illogical how do you now say he didn't provide any

I don’t actually consider that a reason for why I’m scum. That’s why he voted me but I don’t think anyone is going to say “he’s scum because he acted nonchalant “ so I disregard that as an actual reason as should any other logical person.

If he wants to say that’s an actual reason, I’ll concede he’s given one but I don’t count it as one.

Think almidia is probably slightly more likely to be town here even though his vote on me is p bad if it’s mostly bc I said I wasn’t gonna townlead this game

I remember SRing skitt in like my 3rd game on site bc I thought it was scummy that she was claiming to be able to read people off RVS stuff so I feel like this is a similar thought process

In post 119, alimdia wrote:I'm actually just gonna step back and let the other people chime in with their thoughts before this becomes a 10 page pool of fluff and people don't bother reading half of it.

Good idea. This arguing is going nowhere

In post 120, Datisi wrote:Like what

You’re going to accept “wimpy is scum cause he acted non chalantly” as an actual reason?

"tone" is a thing scum can be caught on yes

I didn’t say you were scum because you were nonchalant, I said I was lightly SLing you because it felt like you cared a little too much about being perceived as nonchalant

So I voted you, dats sheeped me, and you’ve been badposting since then

Like how you're calling my posting awkward? That's a tonal read my dude

Scum have significantly more interest in looking nonchalant than town in RVS because RVS is normally just chill times if you’re town, but scum already know everyone’s alignment so it’s a little harder to come across as natural

It’s a fairly natural thing for self-aware scum to try and compensate for this knowledge differential and paranoia that they’re going to be caught out for acting unnaturally by overcompensating in the other direction

It’s not loads, but it’s enough to go off as a starting point

You weren’t scum specifically for that, but you are scum based on how you’ve reacted to this push

So, like I said

Gonna be disappointed in town if you’re not at L-1 by the time I get back to thread later

In post 29, Menalque wrote:I will not be efforting this game, just so y’all know what to be expecting from me

For somebody not efforting, you really are efforting hard.

Guys. It was page 2 vote. There’s not enough evidence to suggest anyone was actually scum. It was the first series of posts where I thought damn he really could be scum. Let me pressure him and see what happens.

What has happened was, he cracked and so did you. You guys have an unrealistic expectation of how solid a reason needs to be for page 2.

Lighten up. It’s a game. I play for fun. You can agree or disagree with my reasons all you want. I don’t care.

You can call me scum all you want. I don’t care.

You can even lynch me if you want. I don’t care.

I’m going to get back to work. When I come back I’ll ignore this whole discussion and hopefully others will have chimes in.

Good day chaps.

This isn’t me efforting a game lol this game just happens to be super easy

You guys are right. I’m wrong. Better?

Jfc a bunch of try hards ruining my fun.

In post 27, Wimpy wrote:

In post 23, Datisi wrote:Maybe y'all should stick to salads

VOTE: Datisi

In post 47, Wimpy wrote:It was a serious vote

“Guys. It was a page 2 vote. There’s not enough evidence to suggest anyone was actually scum.”

So which time were you telling the truth?

Like I’m sorry you rolled scum fam *shrug*

I didn’t though. You’re either scum or one of these gorilla types who pound their chest the loudest thinking they’ve found scum with like no logical reasons for it.

In post 121, Wimpy wrote:That reason is illogical cause you can’t determine tone.

Wimpy can you tell me how it's logical to assume both
1) you can't determine tone so it's illogical to call someone scum based on tone
And
2) Datisi sounded scummy because she sounded awkward (cough tone cough)

In post 143, Menalque wrote:

In post 27, Wimpy wrote:

In post 23, Datisi wrote:Maybe y'all should stick to salads

VOTE: Datisi

In post 47, Wimpy wrote:It was a serious vote

“Guys. It was a page 2 vote. There’s not enough evidence to suggest anyone was actually scum.”

So which time were you telling the truth?

Both.

Have you played mafia before?

Because voting somebody seriously for something I think is scummy doesn’t mean I legit think he’s scum. I never declared I thought he is definitely scum.

Based on what has transpired though, you look more like scum than he does. I still find him scummy also. Imagine that. I can find people scummy and still don’t know if they are scum.

Clearly I must be scum. How can town think somebody is scummy but not think they are actually scum...

And cause with you I actually think it needs to be said. that last line was sarcasm.

In post 146, Datisi wrote:

In post 121, Wimpy wrote:That reason is illogical cause you can’t determine tone.

Wimpy can you tell me how it's logical to assume both
1) you can't determine tone so it's illogical to call someone scum based on tone
And
2) Datisi sounded scummy because she sounded awkward (cough tone cough)

I never said you sounded scummy or sounded awkward.

I did however say based on past experiences I have seen scum act awkwardly in rvs and do the exact same thing you did.

So it’s very logical to see that here and for me to be suspicious of you.

Can I ask you a serious question?

Why are you getting bent over one vote?

In the game of mafia people are going to vote you over and over again. Regardless of alignment you should stay calm and not attack everyone who votes you.

In post 53, Wimpy wrote:Cause I dislike when people come in and reference past games and vote them for it. It violates site rules and

is scummy.

I mean you said I was scummy here

and I'm getting bent because I had a feeling that your reasoning for a "serious vote" was very flimsy and possibly scum indicative

Mena voted me as well and I didn't attack him

however i am willing to drop this pissing match because i don't think it's too helpful for Town