Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 3:46 pm
what?
Mafiascum.net
https://forum.mafiascum-staging.net/
Mini Normal 2109 | Newbie Quotes II: Newb Boogaloo (Day 3)
Page 6 of 51
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:26 pm
19, 20, and 20 all vote vote SausasaurusRex. While this doesn't seem like us, to lynch someone is 7. Those 3 votes got to about 1/2 the lynching point. I don't trust those 3 people (rb, eth0s, & Dolly Parton (Dolly Python))
24 calls the wagon out. While I don't think it would've actually lynch SausasaurusRex, if Rex wasn't Mafia aligned (Since we don't have a FUCKEN ROLELIST) then I would definitely suspect any additional votes on the wagon. I wish we could've seen any additional votes, and decrease the PoE to a few people.
33 is weird. Why would Wake88 want to waste such a wondrous day? (Hey, that alliterated!) I think that this is a suspicious post here, and I'll pay attention to Wake88 more.
I'll just put it here, but Kcdaspot hasn't put much content up to 44. I hope to see content from you later.
Invisible votes me for inactivity, but doesn't seem to respond much to 46. Why?
Kcdaspot comes out with 52. No explanation, just "eth0s is town." This might be TMI, but so blatant and so..
Rex does notice it and responds in 54.
Kcdaspot replies in 57 with "Interaction with alim".
Then the subject is dropped. WTF? You don't explain what exactly with the interaction spewed them as town. That post is really weird. I don't like Kcdaspot here.
63 seems to be a light push against me for voting invisible. This seems like TMI, while WKIng Invisi.
69 says that my vote is bad because reasons that they don't explain. I repeat, they don't explain their reason. While it might be "I know I'm town, so it's a bad vote" that is LAMIST thinking.
72 is when he says that he's trying to forward the game. Is my vote not forwarding the game? Hm.
96 is a vote on me from eth0s. They didn't explain it, they just said that they liked the wagon.
99 is also a vote on me from Kcdaspot. At least they explained it.
101 This post is contradictory. "First, we have time. Second, we don't have time but we have analysis." Why not just use that analysis to.. analyze other players to find the scum instead of lynching a suspected scum? I don't understand your logic here.
116 is just a "We have time post." Well which is it?
122 seems like TMI.
123 is more TMI.
124 calls out the TMI bullshit that was 122&123
125 denies 124 calling out their bullshit.
Overall, my reads are:
Town
Jake
Alimdia
SausasaurusRex
rb (NULL)
Arkias
Lil Uzi Vert
Rabid Schnauzer (NULL)
Dolly Parton
Joey_
Wake88
Invisibility
Kcdaspot
eth0s
Scum
24 calls the wagon out. While I don't think it would've actually lynch SausasaurusRex, if Rex wasn't Mafia aligned (Since we don't have a FUCKEN ROLELIST) then I would definitely suspect any additional votes on the wagon. I wish we could've seen any additional votes, and decrease the PoE to a few people.
33 is weird. Why would Wake88 want to waste such a wondrous day? (Hey, that alliterated!) I think that this is a suspicious post here, and I'll pay attention to Wake88 more.
I'll just put it here, but Kcdaspot hasn't put much content up to 44. I hope to see content from you later.
Invisible votes me for inactivity, but doesn't seem to respond much to 46. Why?
Kcdaspot comes out with 52. No explanation, just "eth0s is town." This might be TMI, but so blatant and so..
something
... that it went mainly un-noticed.Rex does notice it and responds in 54.
Kcdaspot replies in 57 with "Interaction with alim".
Then the subject is dropped. WTF? You don't explain what exactly with the interaction spewed them as town. That post is really weird. I don't like Kcdaspot here.
63 seems to be a light push against me for voting invisible. This seems like TMI, while WKIng Invisi.
69 says that my vote is bad because reasons that they don't explain. I repeat, they don't explain their reason. While it might be "I know I'm town, so it's a bad vote" that is LAMIST thinking.
72 is when he says that he's trying to forward the game. Is my vote not forwarding the game? Hm.
96 is a vote on me from eth0s. They didn't explain it, they just said that they liked the wagon.
99 is also a vote on me from Kcdaspot. At least they explained it.
101 This post is contradictory. "First, we have time. Second, we don't have time but we have analysis." Why not just use that analysis to.. analyze other players to find the scum instead of lynching a suspected scum? I don't understand your logic here.
116 is just a "We have time post." Well which is it?
122 seems like TMI.
123 is more TMI.
124 calls out the TMI bullshit that was 122&123
125 denies 124 calling out their bullshit.
Overall, my reads are:
Town
Jake
Alimdia
SausasaurusRex
rb (NULL)
Arkias
Lil Uzi Vert
Rabid Schnauzer (NULL)
Dolly Parton
Joey_
Wake88
Invisibility
Kcdaspot
eth0s
Scum
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:30 pm
oh wait does this mean scumsclip cuz I was just being sarcastic lolIn post 125, Invisibility wrote:what?In post 124, alimdia wrote:slip or??? :cop:In post 122, Invisibility wrote:love it when town self votes
also I’ll read your big reads list tomorrow jake I gotta sleep
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:42 pm
Yes I meant scumslip. When you call someone that you were pushing town.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 4:43 pm
I dislike how the 3 people that voted for Jack is the scummiest on Jack's read list by the way.
Even from the POV of you being town, being wrong =/= scum.
I'll read your other stuff later, its hard to read when its in that format
Even from the POV of you being town, being wrong =/= scum.
I'll read your other stuff later, its hard to read when its in that format
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:08 pm
fucking lmao, you twist my words more than my mother in lawIn post 64, Kcdaspot wrote:Joey be acting like he wants to extend day one artificially
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:09 pm
Also the point of the game is not "murder" but "correct murder"
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:14 pm
lol this table
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:21 pm
Why would you vote for someone who hasn't posted? its a trick q btwIn post 32, Dolly Parton wrote:Aight den.In post 30, SausasaurusRex wrote:Town. It doesn’t matter to make this known, because the scum know everyone’s alignments anyway, unless there’s a third party in this game.In post 28, Dolly Parton wrote:Well tell us... Is you a newbie scummy or a newbie towny? You're answer is always 100% right or wrong here... Choose wisely.In post 27, SausasaurusRex wrote:I ... didn’t expect this reaction. This is my first non-newbie game, and the first time I’ve participated in RVS. I was under the assumption you can bite anyone, and nothing is taken seriously in this stage. It appears I was wrong.
UNVOTE:
I'll believe you for now.
UNVOTE:
moving on
VOTE: jake
Because you ain't posted yet.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:23 pm
Same q to you, why would you vote someone who hasn't posted?
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:24 pm
why would you answer if it doesn't matterIn post 30, SausasaurusRex wrote:Town. It doesn’t matter to make this known, because the scum know everyone’s alignments anyway, unless there’s a third party in this game.In post 28, Dolly Parton wrote:Well tell us... Is you a newbie scummy or a newbie towny? You're answer is always 100% right or wrong here... Choose wisely.In post 27, SausasaurusRex wrote:I ... didn’t expect this reaction. This is my first non-newbie game, and the first time I’ve participated in RVS. I was under the assumption you can bite anyone, and nothing is taken seriously in this stage. It appears I was wrong.
UNVOTE:
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:29 pm
I will out that soon since hes on the rope block, but jake kinda t told in his first 3 posts
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:49 pm
I reread seriously, I really don't think jake is mefia, the "cases" are pretty unsubstantial
The monkey has probably the worst content at face value; he shades half the table at every opportunity, incoherent (misreps), hypocritical (calls ppl out for lack of content irrc, produces nothing of value) and overall thinks he's a cool kid while he's not. The only thing going for them is that they're actually being consistent in having bad content, which means it could be better explained by personality than alignement.
I think the jake/invis interaction is most likely TvsT, sue me
The monkey has probably the worst content at face value; he shades half the table at every opportunity, incoherent (misreps), hypocritical (calls ppl out for lack of content irrc, produces nothing of value) and overall thinks he's a cool kid while he's not. The only thing going for them is that they're actually being consistent in having bad content, which means it could be better explained by personality than alignement.
I think the jake/invis interaction is most likely TvsT, sue me
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:58 pm
To be fair, monkey's d5 is his best and its arguably around the first concrete wagon where people tends to alignement tell, shrugs
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 5:59 pm
rather than rvs, thats what i meant. whatever i am tired
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 6:11 pm
I do not like this post, not even because I'm the top SR, but the only thing he even had to say about me was just restating what I did. Also there's a ton of useless commentary on other things where he just states what happened without so much as an opinion. I think I'm actually cool with seeing this lynch through to completion.In post 126, Jake The Wolfie wrote:19, 20, and 20 all vote vote SausasaurusRex. While this doesn't seem like us, to lynch someone is 7. Those 3 votes got to about 1/2 the lynching point. I don't trust those 3 people (rb, eth0s, & Dolly Parton (Dolly Python))
24 calls the wagon out. While I don't think it would've actually lynch SausasaurusRex, if Rex wasn't Mafia aligned (Since we don't have a FUCKEN ROLELIST) then I would definitely suspect any additional votes on the wagon. I wish we could've seen any additional votes, and decrease the PoE to a few people.
33 is weird. Why would Wake88 want to waste such a wondrous day? (Hey, that alliterated!) I think that this is a suspicious post here, and I'll pay attention to Wake88 more.
I'll just put it here, but Kcdaspot hasn't put much content up to 44. I hope to see content from you later.
Invisible votes me for inactivity, but doesn't seem to respond much to 46. Why?
Kcdaspot comes out with 52. No explanation, just "eth0s is town." This might be TMI, but so blatant and so..something... that it went mainly un-noticed.
Rex does notice it and responds in 54.
Kcdaspot replies in 57 with "Interaction with alim".
Then the subject is dropped. WTF? You don't explain what exactly with the interaction spewed them as town. That post is really weird. I don't like Kcdaspot here.
63 seems to be a light push against me for voting invisible. This seems like TMI, while WKIng Invisi.
69 says that my vote is bad because reasons that they don't explain. I repeat, they don't explain their reason. While it might be "I know I'm town, so it's a bad vote" that is LAMIST thinking.
72 is when he says that he's trying to forward the game. Is my vote not forwarding the game? Hm.
96 is a vote on me from eth0s. They didn't explain it, they just said that they liked the wagon.
99 is also a vote on me from Kcdaspot. At least they explained it.
101 This post is contradictory. "First, we have time. Second, we don't have time but we have analysis." Why not just use that analysis to.. analyze other players to find the scum instead of lynching a suspected scum? I don't understand your logic here.
116 is just a "We have time post." Well which is it?
122 seems like TMI.
123 is more TMI.
124 calls out the TMI bullshit that was 122&123
125 denies 124 calling out their bullshit.
Overall, my reads are:
Town
Jake
Alimdia
SausasaurusRex
rb (NULL)
Arkias
Lil Uzi Vert
Rabid Schnauzer (NULL)
Dolly Parton
Joey_
Wake88
Invisibility
Kcdaspot
eth0s
Scum
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 6:14 pm
You should work to keep it to the point.In post 126, Jake The Wolfie wrote:19, 20, and 20 all vote vote SausasaurusRex. While this doesn't seem like us, to lynch someone is 7. Those 3 votes got to about 1/2 the lynching point. I don't trust those 3 people (rb, eth0s, & Dolly Parton (Dolly Python))
24 calls the wagon out. While I don't think it would've actually lynch SausasaurusRex, if Rex wasn't Mafia aligned (Since we don't have a FUCKEN ROLELIST) then I would definitely suspect any additional votes on the wagon. I wish we could've seen any additional votes, and decrease the PoE to a few people.
33 is weird. Why would Wake88 want to waste such a wondrous day? (Hey, that alliterated!) I think that this is a suspicious post here, and I'll pay attention to Wake88 more.
I'll just put it here, but Kcdaspot hasn't put much content up to 44. I hope to see content from you later.
Invisible votes me for inactivity, but doesn't seem to respond much to 46. Why?
Kcdaspot comes out with 52. No explanation, just "eth0s is town." This might be TMI, but so blatant and so..something... that it went mainly un-noticed.
Rex does notice it and responds in 54.
Kcdaspot replies in 57 with "Interaction with alim".
Then the subject is dropped. WTF? You don't explain what exactly with the interaction spewed them as town. That post is really weird. I don't like Kcdaspot here.
63 seems to be a light push against me for voting invisible. This seems like TMI, while WKIng Invisi.
69 says that my vote is bad because reasons that they don't explain. I repeat, they don't explain their reason. While it might be "I know I'm town, so it's a bad vote" that is LAMIST thinking.
72 is when he says that he's trying to forward the game. Is my vote not forwarding the game? Hm.
96 is a vote on me from eth0s. They didn't explain it, they just said that they liked the wagon.
99 is also a vote on me from Kcdaspot. At least they explained it.
101 This post is contradictory. "First, we have time. Second, we don't have time but we have analysis." Why not just use that analysis to.. analyze other players to find the scum instead of lynching a suspected scum? I don't understand your logic here.
116 is just a "We have time post." Well which is it?
122 seems like TMI.
123 is more TMI.
124 calls out the TMI bullshit that was 122&123
125 denies 124 calling out their bullshit.
Overall, my reads are:
Town
Jake
Alimdia
SausasaurusRex
rb (NULL)
Arkias
Lil Uzi Vert
Rabid Schnauzer (NULL)
Dolly Parton
Joey_
Wake88
Invisibility
Kcdaspot
eth0s
Scum
If you're Scum walls of post will not save you.
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:09 pm
VOTE: Invisibility
slip is enough for a day1 lynch
off we go
slip is enough for a day1 lynch
off we go
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:10 pm
ill also lynch jake the wolfie just because his posting style will make re-reading this game borderline impossible later on
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:14 pm
sausasaurus probably not as new as they sound
not sure that it's alignment indicative, but they're obviously not comfortable being under pressure
worth noting
not sure that it's alignment indicative, but they're obviously not comfortable being under pressure
worth noting
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:15 pm
for real though invisibility is worth a lynch for that possible slip
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:16 pm
Joey is full stop town.
RB is slight town
Wake is also big boi town
PEDIT: I ain't takin the slip seriously until there's more meat on that case
RB is slight town
Wake is also big boi town
PEDIT: I ain't takin the slip seriously until there's more meat on that case
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:17 pm
no case is neededIn post 137, Joey_ wrote:I reread seriously, I really don't think jake is mefia, the "cases" are pretty unsubstantial
The monkey has probably the worst content at face value; he shades half the table at every opportunity, incoherent (misreps), hypocritical (calls ppl out for lack of content irrc, produces nothing of value) and overall thinks he's a cool kid while he's not. The only thing going for them is that they're actually being consistent in having bad content, which means it could be better explained by personality than alignement.
I think the jake/invis interaction is most likely TvsT, sue me
the slip is enough
don't be daft, vote invisibility
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:18 pm
I don't wanna :p
Posted: Tue Dec 03, 2019 7:18 pm
i've had multiple dozen+ page arguments about whether to lynch based on a slip or not, from both ends
and i almost always know when slips are or aren't worth lynching for
and i almost always know when slips are or aren't worth lynching for