Posted: Sun Dec 29, 2019 1:26 pm
I think I must've meant 73 or something. Not sure why I wrote that.
I think I must've meant 73 or something. Not sure why I wrote that.
To be fair, I did quite a similar speculation in 1971 where I wrongly speculated on who was scum. I don't find it alignment indicating. I think chances are that scum would be more scared of doing this speculation, since it necessarily is risky.In post 106, Datisi wrote:Idk, first thing they call out is a possible team, and when I asked why, they simply said "perhaps they are distancing" which kinda seems like an unnatural thought process to me for some reason?
I'm waiting for them to post more tho
As also mentioned by others, you usually should hide who you think is pr. Saying that someone is PR/Scum also baits them to potentially reveal should they be pr.In post 115, GayBabyJailor wrote:i post my thoughts as i think them, town shouldnt be hiding stuffusually
So... Do you think it is alignment indicating or not?In post 126, Map Wolf wrote:To be fair, I did quite a similar speculation in 1971 where I wrongly speculated on who was scum.In post 106, Datisi wrote:Idk, first thing they call out is a possible team, and when I asked why, they simply said "perhaps they are distancing" which kinda seems like an unnatural thought process to me for some reason?
I'm waiting for them to post more thoI don't find it alignment indicating. I think chances are that scum would be more scared of doing this speculation, since it necessarily is risky.
I think it is more likely for town to do it.In post 128, Datisi wrote:So... Do you think it is alignment indicating or not?In post 126, Map Wolf wrote:To be fair, I did quite a similar speculation in 1971 where I wrongly speculated on who was scum.In post 106, Datisi wrote:Idk, first thing they call out is a possible team, and when I asked why, they simply said "perhaps they are distancing" which kinda seems like an unnatural thought process to me for some reason?
I'm waiting for them to post more thoI don't find it alignment indicating. I think chances are that scum would be more scared of doing this speculation, since it necessarily is risky.
Won't they be fishing for PRs though? There's really no argument that looking for PRs is somehow townie. It's anti town at best and scummy at worst.In post 132, GayBabyJailor wrote:im saying scum would speculate in their pt rather than in the main thread
theres nobody else rn
I gave a little leeway due to the holidays, but he hasn't confirmed, so i'm getting a replacement now.In post 137, Saladman27 wrote:@mod Can we get a Dev prod?
Not necessarily but usually scum from my experience share their reads to feign being active in the thread. Not necessarily AI by any means either just a thought to keep on the back of my mind.In post 85, GayBabyJailor wrote:do i need a reason to share my reads?
Can I ask your reasonings? Unless you've stated them and I missed it lel (or even after this post and I haven't seen it yet)In post 103, Datisi wrote:Well yes, an argument on semantics would clog up the thread (since I kinda get a feeling both you and I are astubborntype) and wouldn't bring us anywhere closer to solving the game. That why I really don't wanna start it.
And err, Naerys and GBJ are currently below my null line.
Are you basing your town-read plainly off meta?In post 111, GayBabyJailor wrote:ive never seen map wolf start a wagon as town, only jump on other wagons
seems that's whats happening here too
this means i tr map wolf
If you think they're a possible PR why out it?In post 112, GayBabyJailor wrote:also Norwegian is either PR or scum to me