Mafiascum.net

In post 124, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 105, woodchuck321 wrote:I got nothing to do, so I'll jump on.

VOTE: CheekyTreeky

Hmm. To omgus or not to omgus?

VOTE: Woodchuck

Ok I want to lynch in {Wood, Aldus, Klick} at this point.

I’m willing to lynch Klick.

@CT

What do you have to say about Klick?

I found his RVS question awkward and his "admiring" of my wagon pretty meh. I'm down.

Auro how did you know I wanted my very own wagon for my birthday?

Random sidenote: when I was a teen I read a book called Klick and that character gave me nightmares. I can only vaguely remember it now.

VOTE: Klick

Yeah I like this vote.
But @MM please play

In post 107, Alduskkel wrote:Auro, in post 85 you defended TSE by saying you thought TSE was just memeing, but post 90 makes it clear that’s not the case. Does this change your read at all?

I was talking about the context around which he threw the townread, not that his townread itself was a meme. 90 may be slightly problematic but more than the response, it's his lack of engagement with Klick (and the Klick vote) that bothers me.

I townread him for the natural tone and the strategy post, but it's weaker now.

TSE, do you think Klick's concerns about you are unjustified? If not, why not talk to him about them?

In post 121, CheekyTeeky wrote:Are you trying to town tell by emulating a recent game? But what about... Aldus and Klick?

I was just trying to annoy you

In post 115, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:May I ask why you Town read Klick?

I like his push on you.

As a side note, I think a lot of RVS posts end up seeming awkward, town or scum. Rhul's RVS post was probably decided before gamestart.

I don't see the problem with Klick choosing to keep a vote on a slot he was scumhunting, over a lol Cheeky wagon.

It was more the subtle encouragement of the wagon. His content in general seems empty.

In post 107, Alduskkel wrote:VOTE: TSE

I’m not buying your Auro town read. Anyone could have easily said what Auro said regardless of alignment.

What'd you make of Auro saying it wa a valid reason to townread him?

In post 103, Klick wrote:

In post 90, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:

In post 87, Klick wrote:It's not clear to me that the read isn't serious. But also, the read can't be both serious and memeing.
It's ambiguous and I'd like to hear what TSE has to say about it. I can see your logic but I'm not convinced it's where town!TSE would go in their logic.

Overtime Auro’s Alignment will be more clear for me.
As for RN I’ll consider him Town.

Make sense?

A claim like this has no value. I still don't get WHY you're considering Auro town. What I'm questioning is how you came to that conclusion. That fact that you still haven't given a straight answer to that is suspect.

Yshtola Rhul wrote:

In post 93, Chemist1422 wrote:Yeah I think there’s actually more value for VTs to inflate their townreads as a sort of mason cover

If you can justify a strong townread on someone and get the scum to believe you’re masons and shoot you, that outs a scum and clears a town

This is also likely to backfire now that it has been pointed out.

Hopefully the masons are able to accurately disguise each other just fine.

Basically this. The theory discussion is a big distraction. This setup requires a good amount of town deception and that's as far as we need to go into that rabbit hole.
Yshtola is town

Wait was that when I was trying to joke around and say no?
Maybe.
Anyway, let me make it more simple.
I’m considering Auro an IC for Day 1.
On Day 2 I’ll re-evaluate him.
While his post can come from scum I’m letting it slide as Town for today.

@Auro

Something that bothers me is Klick said the following:

In post 51, Klick wrote:

In post 39, Chemist1422 wrote:one post reads are generally not a good idea in my experience

Town

And didn’t give my read on you a pass.

Makes me think they are probably scum.

Why not just ask him for reasoning? I don't see why that's hypocritical, unless he refuses to explain the read - but no one ever asked him to begin with.

In post 109, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 9, Alduskkel wrote:

In post 3, bugspray wrote:i dont remember /in to this game what

yeah you /outed lol

VOTE: Homura
because rebellion was a mistake

Chemist1422 wrote:VOTE: Chemist

this is my easy strat to clear myself as a VT is it working

i dunno can a goon shoot him to check please?

Scumpost.

y tho

In post 123, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm townreading Aethur and TSE.

who is Aethur?

In post 129, CheekyTeeky wrote:Random sidenote: when I was a teen I read a book called Klick and that character gave me nightmares. I can only vaguely remember it now.

it'd be even spookier if it turned out that such a book ~never existed~

In post 135, CheekyTeeky wrote:It was more the subtle encouragement of the wagon. His content in general seems empty.

Empty how?

In post 136, Homura wrote:

In post 107, Alduskkel wrote:VOTE: TSE

I’m not buying your Auro town read. Anyone could have easily said what Auro said regardless of alignment.

What'd you make of Auro saying it wa a valid reason to townread him?

Seems just a tad scummy, moreso if TSE later flips scum. If TSE flips scum then it looks like Auro is trying to poke at TSE to engage with Klick in a townier way.

In post 137, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Anyway, let me make it more simple.
I’m considering Auro an IC for Day 1.
On Day 2 I’ll re-evaluate him.
While his post can come from scum I’m letting it slide as Town for today.

Seriously? What if Auro started doing the scummiest shit ever? I'd almost think you're setting up for a potential pivot onto a Day 2 Auro vote.

also reminder to myself to reply to 138 after Klick replies to it

In post 140, Alduskkel wrote:

In post 109, CheekyTeeky wrote:

In post 9, Alduskkel wrote:

In post 3, bugspray wrote:i dont remember /in to this game what

yeah you /outed lol

VOTE: Homura
because rebellion was a mistake

Chemist1422 wrote:VOTE: Chemist

this is my easy strat to clear myself as a VT is it working

i dunno can a goon shoot him to check please?

Scumpost.

y tho

In post 123, CheekyTeeky wrote:I'm townreading Aethur and TSE.

who is Aethur?

In post 129, CheekyTeeky wrote:Random sidenote: when I was a teen I read a book called Klick and that character gave me nightmares. I can only vaguely remember it now.

it'd be even spookier if it turned out that such a book ~never existed~

In post 135, CheekyTeeky wrote:It was more the subtle encouragement of the wagon. His content in general seems empty.

Empty how?

In post 136, Homura wrote:

In post 107, Alduskkel wrote:VOTE: TSE

I’m not buying your Auro town read. Anyone could have easily said what Auro said regardless of alignment.

What'd you make of Auro saying it wa a valid reason to townread him?

Seems just a tad scummy, moreso if TSE later flips scum. If TSE flips scum then it looks like Auro is trying to poke at TSE to engage with Klick in a townier way.

In post 137, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Anyway, let me make it more simple.
I’m considering Auro an IC for Day 1.
On Day 2 I’ll re-evaluate him.
While his post can come from scum I’m letting it slide as Town for today.

Seriously? What if Auro started doing the scummiest shit ever? I'd almost think you're setting up for a potential pivot onto a Day 2 Auro vote.

also reminder to myself to reply to 138 after Klick replies to it

Well if Auro Open wolves then OFC in retracting that IC on him.

I’m retracting*

well then it just sounds like you're townreading auro until it's convenient for you not to

In post 141, TrueSoulEnergy wrote:Well if Auro Open wolves then OFC in retracting that IC on him

In post 143, Alduskkel wrote:well then it just sounds like you're townreading auro until it's convenient for you not to

Exactly.

Well not quite actually

I’m town reading until he becomes scummy to the point it overtakes 1 Townie Post.
If you get what I’m throwing down here?

In post 148, Alduskkel wrote:

Yes?