Mafiascum.net

In post 123, Datisi wrote:

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:How many scum do you think we have in this setup? Is there a possibility of third-party factions?

huh, now that hiraki's mentioned it. what was the purpose of this question?

RQS

A 9p normal is always 7T v 2S as far as I’m aware?

In post 119, Madoka wrote:

In post 112, bugspray wrote:it was a tinfoil hat brainworm post

Were you saying that Luca's 85 was lamist for agreeing that he is town?

What does brainworm mean?

it was an impulse post i but that's a good explanation for the mindset i prolly had at the time

brainworms are worms that eat your brain and make you stupid


pedit: 3rd party setup spec is kinda weird. im ps ure there cant be 3rd party in micro normals

In post 122, humaneatingmonkey wrote:Hiraki, what exactly am I threatening you with?
do you even scumread me?

Voting me - don't act like you're not trying to force a scumread on me. You're already saying it.

In post 114, humaneatingmonkey wrote:but it's nice to see you react to it because that part's almost AI.

What part of reacting to YOUR post makes it AI? The part where I reacted? My reaction where I asked you for an answer? It's a threat through and through - don't act like it isn't.

Do you think I'm scumreading you? Do I need to say it for it to be real?

In post 124, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 120, Hiraki wrote:

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:How many scum do you think we have in this setup? Is there a possibility of third-party factions?

Small teaser! Let's ask the game about this but never actually say what I think!

you don't see the value in discussing possible setups?

Sure. Do you see the value in asking a question but not actually giving your own opinion?

In post 125, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 123, Datisi wrote:

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:How many scum do you think we have in this setup? Is there a possibility of third-party factions?

huh, now that hiraki's mentioned it. what was the purpose of this question?

RQS

What tells were you going to obtain from setup speculation?

In post 126, Luca Blight wrote:A 9p normal is always 7T v 2S as far as I’m aware?

i dont know this

I agree with Datisi’s points regarding Bugs. Would vote there but I have no idea what the VC is.

In post 125, humaneatingmonkey wrote:

In post 123, Datisi wrote:

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:How many scum do you think we have in this setup? Is there a possibility of third-party factions?

huh, now that hiraki's mentioned it. what was the purpose of this question?

RQS

i meant whether the question was genuine or not. micro normals are always 7 Town v 2 Mafia, so i thought the question was more of a snarky "wow there's so many scummy people, how many scum do we have here?"

but if it was a genuine setup spec question then yeah obviously it's a different meaning.

I don’t remember voting Shiki.

Anyway VOTE: Bugs

In post 126, Luca Blight wrote:A 9p normal is always 7T v 2S as far as I’m aware?

I did not know this.

Hiraki, I'm getting a Datisi wagon started. I casually remarked that I'm getting a scum-tense defensive vibe from you from page 5. I think nothing of it because what's a vibe and I think Datisi is worth pursuing. But from your behavior now, see how I'm getting a defensive vibe? It's almost OMGUS. "OMG you think I'm scum!" Again, which is non-AI. Now? My read on you is you're a bit suspicious trying to make my flaccid posts seem like rockhard towering posts that screams I'm scum.

There are no solid tells from setup speculation, but it's at least better information to look back at later.

VOTE: hiraki forgot to do this earlier

I don't feel comfortable changing my vote to bugs because it could also be Datisi trying to take the opportunity to make dumb answers look like scum.

Why are you not responding to my points that have nothing to do with whatever you just said?

Is there anything in particular you're hoping to get out of starting my wagon that you couldn't get without people voting me?

Also setup spec generally comes into play after we've had some claims. Hopefully not on Day 1.

i don't like his bugs read because i don't think bugs' posts are scum-indicative. meanwhile, i think datisi's early activity is scummier.
however, i do support more pressure on bugs to get him to start speaking more sense.

In post 140, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i don't like his bugs read because i don't think bugs' posts are scum-indicative. meanwhile, i think datisi's early activity is scummier.
however, i do support more pressure on bugs to get him to start speaking more sense.

every time i post there are two places where my they/them pronouns are listed. in my user square area thing and the signature
Use them.

In post 137, Hiraki wrote:Why are you not responding to my points that have nothing to do with whatever you just said?

it has everything to do with whatever i said. so what part about it doesn't feel like a response?

okay i cant even parse half of these posts im gonna try to relax my brain brb soon(tm)

In post 141, bugspray wrote:

In post 140, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i don't like his bugs read because i don't think bugs' posts are scum-indicative. meanwhile, i think datisi's early activity is scummier.
however, i do support more pressure on bugs to get him to start speaking more sense.

every time i post there are two places where my they/them pronouns are listed. in my user square area thing and the signature
Use them.

sorry, in my first language, i don't have gendered pronouns. men or women, i sometimes call 'he'.
i'm going to make mistakes again, but I'm going to try.

why do you scumread Hariki?

In post 140, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i don't like his bugs read because i don't think bugs' posts are scum-indicative. meanwhile, i think datisi's early activity is scummier.
however, i do support more pressure on bugs to get him to start speaking more sense.

This seems contradictory to me.

Can you give examples of Datisi’s scummy early activity?

Actually, whatever, I'm gonna do this and then go to bed rather than do it tomorrow.

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:i'm not sure if scum goes to the game and says "well im gonna research their meta and make fake townreads based on that, so i can be seen as town."

In post 87, humaneatingmonkey wrote:not getting a lot of "excited to know more about the town" vibes from him.

If there's something worth saying, say it. This is absolutely not worth saying and is filler at best.

In post 142, humaneatingmonkey wrote:it has everything to do with whatever i said. so what part about it doesn't feel like a response?

Failure to address how you're threatening me for asking you questions? You can say "Defensive! Defensive! Defensive!" all you want but in order to me defend myself from something, there has to be something to defend myself against. You have stated multiple times that there's nothing - you even went to the point of saying that my reaction to you is an OMGUS, even though I'm fabricating your SR on me. Yet by asking you questions, I get responses like this:

In post 101, humaneatingmonkey wrote:don't worry about it. go ahead and play.

In post 106, humaneatingmonkey wrote:but it's nice to see you get in my face.

In post 114, humaneatingmonkey wrote:but it's nice to see you react to it because that part's almost AI.

So are you intimidating me because I'm "defending" myself or are you intimidating me because you don't really have good answers and you're trying to get me to screw off?

In post 146, Hiraki wrote:even though I'm fabricating your SR on me.

And PS, just to make this clear, when he votes me - let's make sure to ask why he's voting me and see how many times the word defensive pops up!

Sorry for the triple post here but I want to put a nail in the coffin.

In post 134, humaneatingmonkey wrote:My read on you is you're a bit suspicious trying to make my flaccid posts seem like rockhard towering posts that screams I'm scum.

Can people really read human's post and get town vibes? This part clearly states that he thinks I'm suspicious because his posts are incriminating. Also in the same post -

In post 134, humaneatingmonkey wrote:It's almost OMGUS. "OMG you think I'm scum!" Again, which is non-AI.

???

In post 144, humaneatingmonkey wrote:in my first language

What language is this?