Mafiascum.net

I disagree with both of the main wagons at the moment. Here's something I'll start up just to see where it takes me
VOTE: Nips

In post 127, MariaR wrote:I disagree with both of the main wagons at the moment. Here's something I'll start up just to see where it takes me
VOTE: Nips

Do you have any thoughts on Elmo or 0verki11? "No" is an acceptable answer.

VOTE: 0verki11

I feel like Elmo is trying to progress the game forward, now I don't know if I agree with some of the statements he's made, but I think it's town regardless.

I have not read a single 0verki11 post.

In post 125, TheWizard wrote:

alban has been prodded for inactivity.

Sorry for the absence. Will get back asap.

In post 127, MariaR wrote:I disagree with both of the main wagons at the moment. Here's something I'll start up just to see where it takes me
VOTE: Nips

Why do you disagree with the ND wagon?

In post 129, MariaR wrote:I have not read a single 0verki11 post.

Well it's not like he's putting out paragraphs, you couldn't have looked over his posts?

VOTE: MariaR

---

I like Tanner and Looker, and kind of Elmo, not sure about ndmath (not seeing a reason to vote there), not seeing a reason to vote overkill either

Feels like a shitty way to feign content for picking apart my post as I'm showing clear trains of thought. The vote on me is just bleh.
The more I look at this game the happier I am with my vote.

In post 83, Knightmare491 wrote:I don't even know what the hell is this interaction.

In post 55, Tanner wrote:I forgot to close the window, sorry.

Do you agree Math is basically caught scum already?

In post 62, NDMath wrote:Excuse me what?

ND is asking Tanner why he thinks ND is "caught scum already", but Tanner has already sort of explained it in the below post(in spoiler).

Spoiler:

In post 60, Tanner wrote:

In post 25, Solon wrote:Solon/Elmo is likely T/S (in some order) says you, yet you proceed to place a seemingly random vote on Tanner?

There has been no explanation. Scum must be panicking.

In post 63, Tanner wrote:I said I forgot to close the window.

Okay maybe ND did not read that post made by Tanner(60) or did not come to the same conclusion, which is why he asked 62 Which is why when I originally made this post I asked him "what happened here" because Tanner did not answer him yet he dropped the question by saying what he said below.

In post 70, NDMath wrote:Ah. I see.

To me he replied




When Tanner asked a similar question he replied



I basically asked the same question but he did not answer it, then goes on to vote me for pointing out that inconsistency and asking him about it(?)
After Tanner asks him a similar question he answers it because I presume ND cannot justify a scum read on Tanner or whatever. If ND is town why didn't he answer me in the same way?
I think ND stopped questioning Tanner in 70 because he doesn't want to appear as someone who's overly concerned about other people scum reading them.
There there's this

In post 62, NDMath wrote:I voted because I get scumread for not voting.

While it's not bad in isolation, it is pretty scummy when you consider other things. He's more focused on not being "scum read".

In post 131, Knightmare491 wrote:

In post 127, MariaR wrote:I disagree with both of the main wagons at the moment. Here's something I'll start up just to see where it takes me
VOTE: Nips

Why do you disagree with the ND wagon?

Nothing in his iso really points to me as scummy. I get the vibe that they're a bit...snarky? I could probably use better word choice, but there's definitely nothing in that iso that makes me want to vote them. It's clear they're a smart player so squeezing some more posts out of them will probably get the results your asking for.

In post 132, Dunnstral wrote:Well it's not like he's putting out paragraphs, you couldn't have looked over his posts?

I could've, I just didn't. Why do you think that's so damning that it's vote worthy? Do you think scum are more likely to just not read posts then town? (I won't even go over the other obvious point but you should be able to figure that out yourself)

It would help if this Emperor FlippyNips guy engaged. Even an RVS vote is better than nothing.

VOTE: Elmo TeH Azn

In post 137, Looker wrote:It would help if this Emperor FlippyNips guy engaged. Even an RVS vote is better than nothing.

VOTE: Elmo TeH Azn

In post 126, TheWizard wrote:

NDMath (3):

Tanner, alban, Knightmare491

Elmo TeH AzN (2):

0verki11, Looker

Looker (1):

Elmo TeH AzN

Solon (1):

Raya36

MariaR (1):

Solon

Knightmare491 (1):

NDMath

Not Voting (2):

MariaR, Dunnstral, Emperor flippyNips

With 12 Alive, it takes 7 to lynch.

Deadline:

(expired on 2020-04-25 05:10:00)

Forget where your vote was? Come now child. Place a better vote.

In post 137, Looker wrote:It would help if this Emperor FlippyNips guy engaged. Even an RVS vote is better than nothing.

well my normal rvs play is trolling/fucking around & having those deaths fucked up my rvs play cos i took that seriously & am just in serious mode now

lolz we have a 33.3 chance of winning this

so we probably have two scum to deal with on top of the SK


if they have a switch for the cop and doctor their abilities are useless

???
Are you being stupid on purpose?
There's 3 mafia in this setup.

wait disregard 141 i didn't look at the most obvious spot of the setup

nope just stupid

*tumbleweed*

*insert town-slip here*

Anything to chime in on here love?