Well, the counterpoint to that is the information you’re getting now is the type, frequency, and substance of information you’ll be getting later in the game too. If you don’t think it’s lurky now, then it won’t be lurky then.
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 1:44 am
by Gypyx
Okay then, I guess we'll see if things change later on
i'd appreciate you to show a bit more of your actual thoughprocess though
There are (expired on 2020-06-17 06:05:00) remaining in Day 1
With 13 alive, it takes 7 to lynch.[/area]
Searching for a replacement for Morgan le Fay, who never picked up their role PM.
[/color]
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:16 am
by Gypyx
Right now i'm susp of you, for reasons that I explained plus the lack of thoughts coming directly from you, and of flippyNips, because even though he's not being really serious, I don't like any of his posts currently
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:25 am
by gobbledygook
What thoughts of mine are not coming directly from me?
Unbreonage what does your dance post mean in less confusing gibberish? Are you saying that group if 3 seems town and myself and especially are scum? If so, what makes you say both?
Well, you've been asking a lot of questions, and your vote is based on sheeping, and going through your ISO, it mostly consisted of questions to other peoples
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:30 am
by Gypyx
(Don't mind the quoted post, idk how it got there)
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:36 am
by gobbledygook
I think people misclick the + button on pages and don’t realize they did. You have to refresh the entire browser page to remove a + quoted quote from applying in your next post.
——
Are questions not thoughts, Gypyx? Is my comment that the wagon on Flippy is likely fruitless not a thought? Does the movement from voting Hoopla to joining a wagon with Hoopla not constitute a thought?
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:37 am
by PranaDevil
In post 125, gobbledygook wrote:Well, the counterpoint to that is the information you’re getting now is the type, frequency, and substance of information you’ll be getting later in the game too. If you don’t think it’s lurky now, then it won’t be lurky then.
I'm with Gypyx (fucking hell I hate your name), the current posting seemed okay. Your post very much felt it was announcing that you weren't going to be posting later and instead sitting back and not doing anything, which at best is anti-town, and at worst is scummy.
Vote will remain in absence of a better place for it right now.
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:49 am
by gobbledygook
In post 94, AGar wrote:One, Notty didn't do any nightplanning. Not sure why Espe included him in the comment, that was shady.
Espeonage no comment on this?
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 2:54 am
by Gypyx
In post 135, gobbledygook wrote:I think people misclick the + button on pages and don’t realize they did. You have to refresh the entire browser page to remove a + quoted quote from applying in your next post.
——
Are questions not thoughts, Gypyx? Is my comment that the wagon on Flippy is likely fruitless not a thought? Does the movement from voting Hoopla to joining a wagon with Hoopla not constitute a thought?
the flippy wagon :yeah these are thoughts (your only thoughts in roughly 20 posts), but that's not really the kind of thoughts that make the game go foward, your reason for not wanting to wagon Flippy was his playstyle, something that doesn't change from game to game (or at least not much)
the vote movement : your vote on Hoopla was RVS if i'm not mistaken, and you haven't brought any actual reasons for sheeping her from what I recall
In post 138, Gypyx wrote:the flippy wagon :yeah these are thoughts (your only thoughts in roughly 20 posts)
Good to know that questions do not count as thoughts. Though I wonder how questions are formulated in the first place...
In post 138, Gypyx wrote:but that's not really the kind of thoughts that make the game go foward, your reason for not wanting to wagon Flippy was his playstyle, something that doesn't change from game to game (or at least not much)
The reason you're voting for me is based on playstyle, so I guess we both are not moving the game forward. Maybe I should vote you for not having any thoughts.
In post 138, Gypyx wrote:the vote movement : your vote on Hoopla was RVS if i'm not mistaken,
The vote occurred during RVS, but it was not random.
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 3:41 am
by gobbledygook
Gypyx, why haven't you responded to Hiraki's questions?
In post 138, Gypyx wrote:the flippy wagon :yeah these are thoughts (your only thoughts in roughly 20 posts)
Good to know that questions do not count as thoughts. Though I wonder how questions are formulated in the first place...
In post 138, Gypyx wrote:but that's not really the kind of thoughts that make the game go foward, your reason for not wanting to wagon Flippy was his playstyle, something that doesn't change from game to game (or at least not much)
The reason you're voting for me is based on playstyle, so I guess we both are not moving the game forward. Maybe I should vote you for not having any thoughts.
In post 138, Gypyx wrote:the vote movement : your vote on Hoopla was RVS if i'm not mistaken,
The vote occurred during RVS, but it was not random.
-questions don't really count as thoughts in my opinion, as questions are non-commital and don't really show much about how you're thinking
- i'm voting you based on a message saying what you plan on doing, which i don't really like, you said Flippy's wagon wasn't useful based on the meta knowledge of his playstyle, I think those are
relatively
different?
- then what was it based on? you haven't explained why you thought that hoopla's first message was suspicious, neither did you explain why you went from voting her to sheeping her
and I don't think Hikari's questions call for an answer, unless Hikari tells me otherwise of course, in which case i'll answer
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 4:12 am
by gobbledygook
In post 143, Gypyx wrote:and I don't think Hikari's questions call for an answer, unless Hikari tells me otherwise of course, in which case i'll answer
In post 143, Gypyx wrote:- then what was it based on? you haven't explained why you thought that hoopla's first message was suspicious, neither did you explain why you went from voting her to sheeping her
In post 101, gobbledygook wrote:Wagons are good to move the game forward. Might I suggest a better player to wagon? Flippy is a lurker and when he is here he posts cash gifs, but other than that pressure on him doesn’t do much.
Agar/Gypyx, I am wagoning Emperor for the sake of a wagon. I don't find what Flippy dd to be particularly scummy.
Gypyx, I thought Hoopla's opening post felt ingenuine. Her thought on notscience makes me think she is approaching the game genuinely. What do you think of Espeonage?
Posted: Thu Jun 04, 2020 4:36 am
by CooLDoG
In post 99, Espeonage wrote:Ok so my thoughts are that I would expect town who believes the claim to go, ok cool good to know. It's bit wifom-y so imma leave it to later or just err on the side of randomness.
I believed the claim, but certainly if you were a one shot night 1 vig, there is no side of randomness. EIther two kill show up, or they don't. Highly unlikely for there to be only one kill with two shots on n1.
In post 102, Hoopla wrote:
there are no better wagons on D1 than a lurker/memelord wagon. a ritual sacrifice as old as time to show the mafia gods we mean business.
Hoopla basically wants to wagon someone which will give as little information to the town as possible going into d2. Good to know.
In post 124, Gypyx wrote:I don't, but that's not the point, my point was that saying this had no real effect, other than giving you a justification to lurk later on, not right now
time will tell on this point. Nothing posting is easy to spot.
Maybe I should vote you for not having any thoughts.