Mafiascum.net

In post 123, Raya36 wrote:

In post 116, SleeperSoul wrote:Okay, well I only said "I'm not entirely opposed", it was mostly just lighthearted banter.

Alright. Would you be willing to lynch yourself and votato?

would you be willing to lynch yourself and drew?

Yes I would. And honestly I'm finding his push on sleeper bad but I'm looking into it

How often in this game do people use stuff in the PT as evidence for or against their partner?

I've never played this setup before but I intend to use my PT to sort Drew and I think that's in the best interest of all town

In post 128, Raya36 wrote:I've never played this setup before but I intend to use my PT to sort Drew and I think that's in the best interest of all town

Yeah I agree. It's not like scum can use it to their advantage since it would just seal their own fate. So being as open about what goes on in the PT is best.

Holden and I are mostly talking about set up stuff.

For example I'm of the opinion that since we have a 50/50 chance of hitting scum today. That it might be best to town hunting. If we can find a pure lovers group then lynching everyone else seems like a sure path to victory.

i see my loverpair as pure, but it seems like thats a minority opinion. even among my loverpair.

Here's my stance on the Mr. Khan/drew situation.

I don't like Khan's 50 (if I mislink, it's the one with the messed up quote) due to not understanding how the hell the quote was messed up that badly. However, I confess that isnt AI on it's own. What I think is scummy is that Khan prioritized pushing the slip without addressing the mess up quote at the same time drew begun to push.

In my eyes, I can see how scum!Khan did that to fuel drew suspicions of votato if drew is town. I dont really get the associated read yet, since I'm not sure why scum would go through the hoopla of faking a scumslip on someone yet made such a big blunder quote wise as well. I also don't buy it was coordinated over Drew's confusion that it was me with the slip.

Effectively we are all sudicial neighbors. Town Lovers should treat their pts as such. Scum lovers should just claim scum and be honest.

In post 126, Raya36 wrote:Yes I would. And honestly I'm finding his push on sleeper bad but I'm looking into it

What about it are you looking into in particular?

Weak town read on ray

In post 129, Tuxedo Mask wrote:

In post 128, Raya36 wrote:I've never played this setup before but I intend to use my PT to sort Drew and I think that's in the best interest of all town

Yeah I agree. It's not like scum can use it to their advantage since it would just seal their own fate. So being as open about what goes on in the PT is best.

Holden and I are mostly talking about set up stuff.

For example I'm of the opinion that since we have a 50/50 chance of hitting scum today. That it might be best to town hunting. If we can find a pure lovers group then lynching everyone else seems like a sure path to victory.

I 100% agree. Town hunting is likely the best strategy this game. Drew and I haven't talked much yet

In post 133, HoldenGolden wrote:

In post 126, Raya36 wrote:Yes I would. And honestly I'm finding his push on sleeper bad but I'm looking into it

What about it are you looking into in particular?

Weak town read on ray

We haven't talked too much yet but that's what the conversation is around

In post 131, HoldenGolden wrote:Here's my stance on the Mr. Khan/drew situation.

I don't like Khan's 50 (if I mislink, it's the one with the messed up quote) due to not understanding how the hell the quote was messed up that badly. However, I confess that isnt AI on it's own. What I think is scummy is that Khan prioritized pushing the slip without addressing the mess up quote at the same time drew begun to push.

In my eyes, I can see how scum!Khan did that to fuel drew suspicions of votato if drew is town. I dont really get the associated read yet, since I'm not sure why scum would go through the hoopla of faking a scumslip on someone yet made such a big blunder quote wise as well. I also don't buy it was coordinated over Drew's confusion that it was me with the slip.

you dont think its strange that they both start pushing the same person at the same time? drew is conveniently ignoring khan's quotegate

Votato, picture me and you as scum for a moment. You indicate to me that you want to coordinate a push onto a townie named KASLAM based off a frabicated scum slip. I say sure but then in the thread you post the slip on KASLAM yet its quoted by another player (or vice versa. KASLAM is quoted saying something he didnt).

Would you expect me to go through with it?

The whole execution of the slip logic is so sloppily done that I dont buy it was premeditated between them. Theres not enough there to support that narrative over others like scum!khan fueling town!drew for example.

Also [un][/uv] VOTE: Mr. Khan

Guys I've been busy in another game..... based on that game and the PT my town read on votato is pretty strong. I'll try to catch up later.

In post 137, HoldenGolden wrote:Votato, picture me and you as scum for a moment. You indicate to me that you want to coordinate a push onto a townie named KASLAM based off a frabicated scum slip. I say sure but then in the thread you post the slip on KASLAM yet its quoted by another player (or vice versa. KASLAM is quoted saying something he didnt).

Would you expect me to go through with it?

The whole execution of the slip logic is so sloppily done that I dont buy it was premeditated between them. Theres not enough there to support that narrative over others like scum!khan fueling town!drew for example.

i mean you're right but at the same time, the fabricated quote seems to pretty clearly come from some sort of scum gambit, and i have a hard time explaining it in any context. so you're right that the coordination story is strange given quotegate, but quotegate is strange in any context, and so i dont think the one can be used to disprove the other

I'm Khan lover

But do you town read them?

No

My condolences.

YOU PUSH ME FOR THE QUOTE MIXUP?

Holder's post was quoted from my previous post somehow, and upon realising, I formatted the post to get rid of Holden's but managed to mess it up. How is this in any way scum-motivated?

An action comitted in anger is an action doomed to failure, people.

Anyway, I am heavily overgamed. Calling in Alexander the Great.

...