Mafiascum.net

Anyway I've gotta go to work again soon so

I WILL REFILL MY RAGE BAR AND RETURN WITH EVEN MORE GRR ANGY ENERGY

In post 122, Servant Berserker wrote:

In post 111, Servant Lancer wrote:

In post 104, Servant Berserker wrote:This person can eat a bullet too. That is a super weird response after their initial posts wrt this topic.

Why's it weird?

It's a weird response because I've already said I don't care about being voted anymore?

Multiple times. Once it became clear the power was ubiquitous among townies (4+ people) I no longer cared who got it as long as they were town.

I'm now instead focusing on early game scum hunting and pressure, as you may notice, because I'm not going to be going down the confirmed town 2 days to live plan.

I don't agree that given I let go, you making this post NOW makes any sense. It's a really weird timing issue, especially since I gave it up really fast, too fast for "steamrolling" to be an adequate adjective.

This game is moving fast out of the gate, I didn't see you give it up when I made that post.

It just occurred to me that maybe we should just get scum to claim and then they can take the vote after all.
And then we could have whisked it away.
Albert B. Rampage would be shaking his head at me Rn.
Oh well.

In post 121, Servant Assassin wrote:ok and why is avenger town to you

I'm not willing to towncase anyone yet. Do you have any reads?

In post 114, Servant Berserker wrote:the bolded is the problem. You are trying to defend against something you have imagined as a distraction to your actual scummy responses and play.

It's not a defense.
I am saying why I think you are scum. Chainsaw defense maybe but I think to some degree I am making it known I can't defend against your original argument.

I still think you have used buzz words incorrectly and the town has gone "oh yeah he used cognitive dissonance/whatever that means he is thinking about his posts!" without checking that your usage doesn't even make sense.

I truly don't care to defend myself for your initial point.
Because I can't argue against something that clearly happened.
If enough people think that makes me scum then good job I guess I'll get lynched and I won't have anything to say against it in the dead PT.

In post 128, Servant Lancer wrote:

In post 121, Servant Assassin wrote:ok and why is avenger town to you

I'm not willing to towncase anyone yet. Do you have any reads?

you're voting for them which would imply you read them as town given 101

I do townread them, but this early I don't think it would be useful to towncase them when I'm not sure myself and want to see where others decide to go.
I did like how they responded to my vote.

just trying to parse how berserker is "trying to control the game and steamroll" and therefore unworthy of a vote but avenger gets the ok

You're trying to parse how I have two different reads on two different players?

I’m just trying to steamroll.
Totally different.

yes dumbass i'm asking what makes them distinct in your view

In post 123, Servant Lancer wrote:Normally I'm all about making sure 1v1s don't clog the entire thread, but in this case we skipped right over RVS and I find that kind of cool.

I landed on this page, but am maybe a little more invested in not wanting the thread clogged with 1v1a.

Alter Ego could be a scum.

Story of my playstyle. I'm not going to go out of my way to extinguish style markers. I'm also not going to defend them on what's essentially a burner account.

In post 135, Servant Assassin wrote:yes dumbass i'm asking what makes them distinct in your view

Their approaches aren't really similar at all besides wanting the master vote, and the whole list has reason to want that.
I like Avenger's early sorting and reactions and I don't really like Berserker's.

Also don't call me a dumbass, asshole.

In post 117, Servant Lancer wrote:Foreigner I would actually be interested in the "little things" you scumread from Berserker.

Later I will if you remind me. I don't actually think it would help the thread for a wide range of reasons.
And it would largely just be me explaining where I found Berserker going "too far" and that is entirely my bias POV.

Unless I dove into how I like to solve which is pro scum.

In post 137, Servant Lancer wrote:

In post 135, Servant Assassin wrote:yes dumbass i'm asking what makes them distinct in your view

Their approaches aren't really similar at all besides wanting the master vote, and the whole list has reason to want that.
I like Avenger's early sorting and reactions and I don't really like Berserker's.

Also don't call me a dumbass, asshole.

the only posts they have which could really be construed as "sorting" are 60 and 70, which, if that's what it takes, color me unimpressed - the scumread is even the exact same one as berserker's, so, like, what gives


looks like a fake distinction for a manufactured read from you imo tbh

Greetings, mortals! This is not a dream; it is I, Servant Caster, the great and powerful! Alas, dark forces have conspired to prevent me from posting until now, but I have driven them off with my superior magical prowess. Now I have arrived and you may stow your fear. It shall work out in the end, for a wizard is never late, he arrives precisely when he means to. A few of these thoughts may be slightly dated, as I have been anxiously awaiting the opportunity to demonstrate my superior arcane prowess.

We should master a townread. If anything, targeting a strong townread with this makes them unkillable night 1. Whoever suggested they don't want to lynch scum today to make their role better is probably doing a poor cost-benefit analysis.

Although I am not really townreading Berserker, Lancer 79 is a bad post. Not sure if scummy or just wrong.

I don't find either Berserker or Foreigner's reasons for suspecting the other very compelling at this time. However, I am unsure why Foreigner is halfway to giving up over something no one else seems to give much of a shit about.

Greetings Gandalf. Tell me, do you live in a hedge maze?

I know naught of what you speak, wretched fire-person.

Please do not construe any of the above posts as crumbs, I'm just messing around.

I thought with all that hedging, you were a hedge wizard or something.

Any thoughts on me? Assassin?

Ah. I suppose you could see my post that way if you so choose.

My only thought on Assassin is that I wish he hadn't seen fit to be the first to sling insults around. Perhaps I could call that an overreaction if I were given to reading into things (Oh no, am I hedging again?)

In looking you over, I see that you actually did seem to care about Berserker's points, which I had forgotten. But I don't have a read on you at present either. Magic takes time.

If anyone would like to claim their attribute I would appreciate it.
My role benefits from having that knowledge.

I am aware of Beasts and Shielders attribute already. I will not state on how I know this.
I also know I am dissapointed in Ruler and if they know about the Fate series I am going to be pissed.

In post 146, Servant Foreigner wrote:If anyone would like to claim their attribute I would appreciate it.
My role benefits from having that knowledge.

I am aware of Beasts and Shielders attribute already. I will not state on how I know this.
I also know I am dissapointed in Ruler and if they know about the Fate series I am going to be pissed.

Cabs warned us against that In the OP.

I am hesitant about outing attributes and traits. Although we may have some roles that want that information, scum may as well, and scum have the option of lying while we do not.

Maybe I should read the OP.
I just assumed people didn't want to claim because in fate revealing your identity is typically bad.