Mafiascum.net

steal top

In post 120, Lost wrote: what do you think of his posting recently? or rather, what do you think of his non page-1 posts?

In terms of just his posts, there hasn't been much to sway me on his alignment. He has some simple questioning. It doesn't do much for me. I don't know what any of his reads are yet. I assume he will share at some point, and at that point I can start trying to dissect him.

In terms of associatives, I made a note to myself to keep an eye on him/Nona. I don't necessarily think this is a viable team yet, just noticed some weird stuff. On phone now so posting is a pain but will elaborate more in a bit.

In post 122, Billy Pilgrim wrote:In principle im voting Dong here, but I dont want to lol hammer.

??? how can you lol hammer someone with no votes on him

Ok let me just clarify that my 126 came before I read BP's most recent post on Dong, so obviously he's letting us into his head a bit more now. Thinking about this now.

In post 126, joqiza wrote:In terms of just his posts, there hasn't been much to sway me on his alignment. He has some simple questioning. It doesn't do much for me. I don't know what any of his reads are yet. I assume he will share at some point, and at that point I can start trying to dissect him.

In terms of associatives, I made a note to myself to keep an eye on him/Nona. I don't necessarily think this is a viable team yet, just noticed some weird stuff. On phone now so posting is a pain but will elaborate more in a bit.

yes, do elaborate more.

would be nice to give a brief readlist if possible, be it now or later

@BillyPilgrim

You're comparing Dong's behavior this game to previous town/scum games. Were you in those town games? Or did you just look them up yourself?

The thing about Dong for me, is that, yeah I disagree with a lot of the logic of his posts. I think the SvS read on me/PP was pretty basic, and the 1+/3 pool read in pp/lost/almost was like, pretty contextless (to the point where he had to immediately walk it back to just lost).

Despite this, I just don't know that the way Dong plays is really how scum plays the opening. My man has not outed a single townread. He came in with a big brain 2/2 and then decided to shade lost and almost as well. I kind of stan the energy even if I disagree with the post content itself.

In post 118, Lost wrote:so you agree with everything dong and pp are saying?

I didn't even mention dong in anyway, shape or form.

In post 119, Lost wrote:

In post 116, Almost50 wrote:Btw, does me putting someone @E-1 mean anything to you?

not rly, but if you continue to push it then maybe i'd be interested.

I'd announce intent and ask for a claim if I were you (and that would be regardless of your own alignment, tbh)

In post 121, joqiza wrote:Not really. I can't unvote this one since I'm not on the wagon.

In post 133, Almost50 wrote:I'd announce intent and ask for a claim if I were you (and that would be regardless of your own alignment, tbh)

In post 121, joqiza wrote:Am I interpreting 115 correctly--you TR penguin? Why?

I like penguins

In post 132, Almost50 wrote:

In post 118, Lost wrote:so you agree with everything dong and pp are saying?

I didn't even mention dong in anyway, shape or form.

i mean...

In post 118, Lost wrote:

In post 115, Almost50 wrote:

In post 105, joqiza wrote: Lastly, imma VOTE: Almost50. I don't know where his head's at. Give me something.

In post 114, Lost wrote:choochoo

VOTE: almost

would like to hear more from you almost.

what are your thoughts on dong

My thoughts are the exact same thoughts pf PP

. Whatever he says I agree with, and wherever he votes my vote follows.

so you agree with everything dong and pp are saying?

kind of implies that what you think of dong is the same as what you think of pp, and that your thoughts on pp are "whatever he says i agree with", hence leading me to the conclusion that whatever dong says, you also agree with

but your reply implies otherwise so....once again....

what are your thoughts on dong

In post 133, Almost50 wrote:

In post 119, Lost wrote:

In post 116, Almost50 wrote:Btw, does me putting someone @E-1 mean anything to you?

not rly, but if you continue to push it then maybe i'd be interested.

I'd announce intent and ask for a claim if I were you (and that would be regardless of your own alignment, tbh)

sure

@lost i intend to hammer you pls claim

In post 134, Almost50 wrote:

In post 121, joqiza wrote:Not really. I can't unvote this one since I'm not on the wagon.

In post 133, Almost50 wrote:I'd announce intent and ask for a claim if I were you (and that would be regardless of your own alignment, tbh)

oh ok this makes sense

In post 136, Lost wrote:

In post 132, Almost50 wrote:

In post 118, Lost wrote:so you agree with everything dong and pp are saying?

I didn't even mention dong in anyway, shape or form.

i mean...

In post 118, Lost wrote:

In post 115, Almost50 wrote:

In post 105, joqiza wrote: Lastly, imma VOTE: Almost50. I don't know where his head's at. Give me something.

In post 114, Lost wrote:choochoo

VOTE: almost

would like to hear more from you almost.

what are your thoughts on dong

My thoughts are the exact same thoughts pf PP

. Whatever he says I agree with, and wherever he votes my vote follows.

so you agree with everything dong and pp are saying?

kind of implies that what you think of dong is the same as what you think of pp, and that your thoughts on pp are "whatever he says i agree with", hence leading me to the conclusion that whatever dong says, you also agree with

but your reply implies otherwise so....once again....

what are your thoughts on dong

I mean.. I still don't see where the implication of ANYTHING regarding dong came from? YOU asked about dong. I did NOT respond to that part AT ALL. I only responded to the part about you requesting to hear more from me by telling you I am PP's loyal servant and humble slave.

In post 139, Almost50 wrote:I mean.. I still don't see where the implication of ANYTHING regarding dong came from? YOU asked about dong. I did NOT respond to that part AT ALL. I only responded to the part about you requesting to hear more from me by telling you I am PP's loyal servant and humble slave.

"my thoughts are the exact same thoughts of PP"

by that u meant: my thoughts on the game are the same as PP's thoughts on the game

i asked you "what are your thoughts on dong", and thus when i read that line what i got was: my thoughts on dong are the exact same thoughts i have on PP

which is what i said in 136 but let's move on from this

what are your thoughts on dong

In post 130, joqiza wrote:@BillyPilgrim

You're comparing Dong's behavior this game to previous town/scum games. Were you in those town games? Or did you just look them up yourself?

I looked at its previous games. It took a while to find a scum game, but its in there.

No. You misinterpreted my words. What I meant is I am a follower of PP. O belong to the PP cult. Whatever he says is what my beliefs are. And that DOES apply to his read on dong too.

In post 103, Donempire wrote:

In post 100, Billy Pilgrim wrote:

In post 93, Donempire wrote:I guess my read comes more from not having meta knowledge, but i guess someone coming from epic mafia would play like this. I still dont know what to feel about it, and svs is still an option.
On another note, i dont like penguin/lost/almost just tossing people into the town pile. I think its frankly too early to do anything like this and im sure at least one of them is scum. Town wouldnt, or at least shouldnt feel comfortable tossing everyone they see into townpile just 4 pages into a game.

You think townbinning people too early is scum motivated?

Its anti town, and i dont think people should be indulging in throwing out random reads for the sake of it. Theres clear danger in townreading scum that might not be obvious at first glance, acting and reading people comprehensibly is good for town while throwing out random reads are not.
Whatever. Its 1 am, i just want to say that yeah its pretty anti town

@PP - how strong is your read on Joc?

@Dong, does your concern depend on the strength of the read?

@Pilgrim: I am looking forward to seeing a brace (or maybe another hat-trick) tonight. Keep your fingers crossed.

In post 109, Lost wrote:

In post 67, Billy Pilgrim wrote:

In post 48, Lost wrote:

In post 46, PenguinPower wrote:VOTE: Lost

Like joqiza for town.

me too

Why?

i liked 34

do u have a diff opinion on him?

What made that a town post?

In post 142, Almost50 wrote:No. You misinterpreted my words. What I meant is I am a follower of PP. O belong to the PP cult. Whatever he says is what my beliefs are. And that DOES apply to his read on dong too.

very cool

In post 115, Almost50 wrote:

In post 105, joqiza wrote: Lastly, imma VOTE: Almost50. I don't know where his head's at. Give me something.

In post 114, Lost wrote:choochoo

VOTE: almost

would like to hear more from you almost. what are your thoughts on dong

My thoughts are the exact same thoughts pf PP. Whatever he says I agree with, and wherever he votes my vote follows.

Ew.

In post 118, Lost wrote:

In post 115, Almost50 wrote:

In post 105, joqiza wrote: Lastly, imma VOTE: Almost50. I don't know where his head's at. Give me something.

In post 114, Lost wrote:choochoo

VOTE: almost

would like to hear more from you almost. what are your thoughts on dong

My thoughts are the exact same thoughts pf PP. Whatever he says I agree with, and wherever he votes my vote follows.

so you agree with everything dong and pp are saying?

Why is Dong here?

In post 121, joqiza wrote:

In post 116, Almost50 wrote:Btw, does me putting someone @E-1 mean anything to you?

Not really. I can't unvote this one since I'm not on the wagon. Arguably it is a non-associative but IMO surely if I were scum I'd take a chance to put my partner on E-1 early. I would rather get your takes on the interactions between players this game. Even gut reads can be helpful.

Am I interpreting 115 correctly--you TR penguin? Why?

Why would you want to put your partner at E-1 early if youre scum?