Mafiascum.net

i mean it's partially an icky vote because you're forming a pretty sizeable wagon on the guy who i have the most townpings on so

In post 113, skitter30 wrote:Sure, but there isnt oodles to talk about otherwise yet

We talk about who was placing undue emphasis on it. Or make a big wagon and see what comes of it.

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

In post 126, davesaz wrote:Or make a big wagon and see what comes of it.

see skitter

In post 126, davesaz wrote:We talk about who was placing undue emphasis on it. Or make a big wagon and see what comes of it.

Or we can just do nothing and then panic right before deadline. That one's my personal favorite.

i think we should wagon penguin!

or we can do all of the above and still panic right before deadline

In post 130, skitter30 wrote:i think we should wagon penguin!

that's fine too, though not my preferred wagon for secret reasons

In post 120, Infinity 324 wrote:Maybe they wanted a better fakeclaim, and thought that claiming the "town counterpart" to their role wouldn't work for whatever reason? Idk

good point. lets add that to the list too.

In post 120, Infinity 324 wrote:Hoopla, thoughts on uncrowned?

enthusiastic & busy, which is usually a good sign early.

i do think a couple of his questions seem surface-level, though. in some ways that is nature of the beast for early game discussions; everyone has to start somewhere.

but these sort of questions seem like meaningless busywork:

In post 41, Uncrowned wrote:With this thought process in mind, how many scum do you think there is between myself (14) Infinity (23) and Petapan (100000)?

Makes sense.

VOTE: skitter though I agree wit the concept, the way he said “icky vote” felt a bit like buddying to me.

I think 41 is a pretty good question. Why do you see it as meaningless?

In post 134, Infinity 324 wrote:Makes sense.

VOTE: skitter though I agree wit the concept, the way he said “icky vote” felt a bit like buddying to me.

*she!

why buddying?

I feel like a more natural response would’ve been to ask the reasons, it’s a bit early to be emotionally attached to your reads in the way you seemed to be.

i mean she did ask for reasons but she also knows me

In post 135, davesaz wrote:I think 41 is a pretty good question. Why do you see it as meaningless?

i like using data to capture broad trends, or to theorise in a general way - but when you zoom into a specific subset of the playerlist before flips, it is just guesswork.

to throw him a bone: my guess is a slightly higher than random amount in that specific group of three players.

In post 137, Infinity 324 wrote:I feel like a more natural response would’ve been to ask the reasons, it’s a bit early to be emotionally attached to your reads in the way you seemed to be.

- i did ask for reasons, part of the reason i voted is because his response was rather unsatisfactory
- idk what you mean by 'emotionally attached to my reads'

In post 141, skitter30 wrote:part of the reason i voted is because his response was rather unsatisfactory

uh...you were already voting me

oh sorry: part of the reason i doubled down is cuz your response was rather unsatisfactory

you're right ^

I'm not sure why you would expect anything different from me.

UNVOTE:
VOTE: penguinpower

UNVOTE:

VOTE: Infinity 324

In post 144, PenguinPower wrote:I'm not sure why you would expect anything different from me.

idk can i cite magic/soulread? you feel like how i think scum!you would feel
or actually trying to, like, quantify it: i think that town!you would not have cast that vote just for 'wagonz', and i think that town!you would have also engaged with me saying i thought uncrowned was townie

wrong on part one

kinda right on part two

quack?